Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (17446)	11/23/2003 5:02:10 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 793766

The heart of the matter: the question of which party has a better response to terrorist threats to the United States and its interests abroad. The Democrats want it ALL their way: They have voiced NO plan to defeat terrorism, but CONTINUE to Bash the Bush Administration for their plan.. The Dems want to STALL every vote on the Judicial placements, and threaten filibuster if they don't get their way.. The Dems have yammered for years about the proposed Drug plan for Seniors (look what Hillary's group accomplished...higher prices everywhere, on ALL medical services since 1993), and the House passes one, now the Dems again threaten to filibuster like spoiled children.. The Dems don't like the ad...want it cancelled. The Dems for the last 6 months or so, have had 9 possible candidates running all over the country, bashing the Bush Administration. And then they have the guts to say anything about "stiffling descent." And as far as Ted Kennedy having the guts to say say anything (see quote below) about Bush, when he has called Bush a liar and worse for months, is sick...and/or a 'cups disease'.. And Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, speaking on the ABC News program "This Week," said that by challenging Democrats' patriotism the advertisement amounted to an "attempt to stifle dissent."