Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (2364)	1/7/2004 7:38:55 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7936

Like I said, that stupidss wall cuts deep into the WB in some places. Sharon is a real piece of work.* If it is designed to protect Israeli settlements that face attack and those settlements are in the WB then it makes sense that the wall cuts in to the WB. Also I would distinguish between supporting or at least accepting the wall and supporting or accepting the exact boundaries that Sharon gives it. I signified some support for the idea, but that doesn't mean I support every possible implementation of the idea. Tim

To: tejek who wrote (2364)	1/8/2004 9:25:44 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7936

Like I said, that stupidss wall cuts deep into the WB in some places. Sharon is a real piece of work.* You would prefer that they let the suicide bombers just keep coming into Israel whenever they want to, and let the militants watch the cars drive by and lob mortars at them whenever they want to? I don't like what Israel is doing, but I know if I were in their shoes I sure as he!! would want the wall to protect myself and my family. And so, if you lived there, would, I believe, you.