SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dayuhan who wrote (17658)11/25/2003 3:39:44 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793717
 
Some more grim news.

After the bombs

Maureen Freely grew up in Istanbul. After Friday's terrorist attacks she caught the first plane back - and found the city bloodied but defiant

Tuesday November 25, 2003
The Guardian

When the bomb exploded outside the synagogue in the old Istanbul neighbourhood of Galata 10 days ago, my brother Brendan was in his flat around the corner. When the bomb went off outside the British consulate five days later, he was on his way to his favourite chicken shop outside the fish market opposite the consulate entrance. If he had left a quarter of an hour earlier, he would no longer be with us.
My parents were on their way to buy a new refrigerator that morning. They were heading for the mall just a hill or two inland, across the street from the HSBC Bank. Had they left 10 minutes earlier, they would have been standing in traffic next to the truck carrying the bomb.

My friend Nakiye was meant to have been at a meeting in the Renault building, also just across from the HSBC. She was leaving her office when she got a call that pushed the meeting forward half an hour. If she had not caught that call, she would have been outside the bank at the time of the blast.

Outside the bank is a metro station. My father's colleague Yannis had just come out of it and was a few hundred yards away when the bomb went off. Meanwhile, on the other side of the city, my 22-year-old niece was boarding the same metro line. She had spent the evening with her best friend, who lives a few hundred yards from the consulate. The friend had tried to talk her into taking the day off work. If she had, they would probably have witnessed the bombing from their favourite haunt, the old Greek wine bar across the street from the red guardhouse that flanked the entrance to the British consulate and is now a pile of rubble.

This might sound a set of strange coincidences, but they are not. All the bombs that went off in Istanbul last week were in busy neighbourhoods that hundreds of thousands of people pass through daily. Most of them might be Turkish Muslims, but Istanbul has always been a city of many religions and cultures. A large percentage of the country's Turkish non-Muslims are concentrated in these same areas, as are the city's many thousands of foreign residents and the many hundreds of foreign-owned businesses. The area around the British consulate is teeming with other consulates. There are three churches and a mosque within a few hundred yards. There is no way of targeting foreigners without targeting Turks in these crowded streets and no way of protecting them either. This is presumably why the Foreign Office has advised all British nationals to stay away from the city until further notice, and why almost everyone I know in England thinks I was crazy to fly home on the first plane.

I am glad I did. I am glad, most of all, because I have learned, once again, not to trust what I see on television. Especially if I am seeing a place I think I know. My family moved to Istanbul when I was eight, and have lived there almost continuously since, so every pile of rubble I saw on television last week was a building ripped from my past. There was the Greek delicatessen where we bought our butter and our bacon when I was little. There was the consular residence, where my own children used to play. There was the chapel where my best friend was confirmed. There was the hospital where my father had his hip operation last summer. But now it was what Bush was calling the new front in his war on terror. I felt physically ill, and I felt worse every time a well-meaning person asked me if my family was safe. "Well that's all right, then," they would say. Oh no it is not, I wanted to say. It is not all right at all.

Radio 4 and the broadsheet comment pages reflected my pessimism. A bridge between east and west had been destroyed, said one. It was only a matter of time before the west pulled out entirely. I had heard all about the new draconian security measures: the truck now blocking the gate to the American-owned Robert College, where my brother-in-law teaches; the armed guards and sniffer dogs outside the malls, the banks, the supermarkets, and just about anything with a foreign-sounding name; the blockades around the building that was, until a few months ago, the US consulate, and has now become the temporary headquarters for the British. So I was expecting to find the streets empty and most of the city's 10 million residents cowering behind closed doors.

Indeed, there was a great hush in the arrivals lounge. For the first time ever, I did not have to queue for a visa. But once we had left the airport, it was hard to see any sign of a crisis. The streets were clogged with traffic and people shopping for the holiday that begins today. The shores of the Bosphorus were lined with fishermen and a procession of large, slow-moving families enjoying the unusually fine weather. The restaurants and cafes were doing a brisk business, and every few hundred metres there was a florist overflowing on to the pavement to meet the seasonal demand.

In my brother's neighbourhood, which was ankle deep in broken glass a week ago, the glaziers have been working so hard that there is a joke rumour going around that they were the masterminds behind the bomb. Now all but a few of the windows have been replaced, bar the ones on the mosque next door to the synagogue. The buildings across the street have lost their fronts and been condemned. But the lighting store next to them is open for business.

My brother says that the shopkeepers on the street were out with their brooms within minutes of the explosion. It was the residents who got the wounded to hospital. He saw no official presence for two hours.

They are very much in evidence now. Those with homes or businesses in the affected areas must leave their identity cards with the police manning the barricades. Anyone who stops to look at the damage can expect to be filmed by a man who may or may not be an innocent journalist. It is all very subtle, and very calm. The shopkeepers in the fish and flower markets near to where the entrance to the British consulate stood until last Thursday do not want to talk about the bomb any more. They would rather sell me a string of red peppers or talk me into a pair of wonky glasses and a monster mask. Like my friends, they see staying at home behind closed doors as a form of defeat. They are determined to get life back to normal as soon as possible, no matter what.

This was Istanbul's September 11. They thought they were safe from the war on terror because they thought all Muslims were brothers. Now they know otherwise, and are unified in their condemnation of the terrorists, who cannot be "true Muslims". The fact that the terrorists staged this attack in the last days of Ramadan has added to their outrage. But no one is in any doubt why the city has become a terrorist target. How its residents respond to their new status depends very much on how much support they get (or fail to get) from the allies who dragged them into this. As one shopkeeper put it, "Surely, now that we have suffered this, the EU must open its arms to us." If it doesn't, or if the US gives the impression, as it has sometimes done in the past, that it is taking Turkey's "sacrifice" for granted, the sense of betrayal could be huge.

But right now, everyone's mind is on the present, on trying to survive. By that I do not mean that people are avoiding danger, but that they are quite adamantly refusing to let danger change the way they live. And God only knows they have had practice. In the past three years, they have been playing this game so much they have hardly had time to breathe. Begin with the earthquake, in which the official death toll was 18,000 but may well have been twice that. Continue with the crippling recession, which has yet to ease, and the crimewave that has followed in its wake. Even so, this has remained an exemplary city. To visit Istanbul over the past few years has been to see friends look after each other in ways that we in the privatised west have long forgotten. According to the local code of conduct, the most dangerous thing is solitude, the next worst thing is to sit at home behind closed doors. The worse things get, the more important it is to go out with your friends and do whatever you have to do to laugh adversity away.

Two winters ago, when the recession was really beginning to bite, my friend Nakiye and I went out to an all-night dancing club. At least half the people there had lost good, secure jobs. When the owner put on an insipid Turkish pop song entitled "I'm deep in a depression" they all jumped to their feet and did a communal belly dance.

When Nakiye and I met on Sunday, the fog that had been sitting over the city earlier in the day suddenly cleared, and it was much in the same spirit that we went out to a fish restaurant on the Bosphorus to watch the sunset. No one else wanted to discuss "the events" any more than she did but their relatives and their mobile phones had other plans. Everyone at the table spoke of the stream of anxious calls they had been getting from dear ones currently abroad, urging them to get out on the first plane.

This sort of thing is easy to shrug off, perhaps, if you are Turkish and Istanbul is your home. It is trickier for those of us who have roots in this city but carry foreign passports. It would be hard to understand this from the sort of coverage we receive in Britain. As my childhood friend Becky says, "They just don't get the point." Because Istanbul is not another Riyadh, where foreigners jet in for two or three years to service foreign interests, to live in separate compounds. It has been the opposite of Riyadh since the days of Byzantium. There were large and commercially significant European concessions - Venetian, Genoese, British, and French - and many of their descendants remained in the city throughout the Ottoman Empire. There were 100,000 Greeks in the city right up until the Cyprus crisis in 1964. About a third of the girls in my secondary school were Greek, Armenian, and Jewish. The last time I went to my sister's (Catholic) church I heard a service in which children sang Christmas carols in 17 languages.

Bogazici University, where my father still teaches, has been a Turkish institution since the early 1970s, but for a century before that it was an American college for Turks. When we arrived 43 years ago, most of the faculty was still American and more than a few of them had come here because, like my father, they dreamed of a world beyond McCarthy, 50s conformity and cold war paranoia. We did not lock ourselves up in expatriate isolation; we were part of the city and we still are.

The gulf that divides the east from the west is something we think about a great deal but we do not see it reflected in our everyday lives. Istanbul is more cosmopolitan than it has ever been. Millions have either worked in Germany and other parts of Europe and still have families there. Any family that can afford it makes sure that they give their children a chance to spend time studying abroad. Since the earthquake, eased relations with Greece have opened the way to an array of cultural and educational exchange programmes. The economic links between the two countries are also growing, as have the links with countries in the former eastern bloc.

When I was a child, Istanbul was an enchanted but neglected cold war outpost. Over the past decade, I have watched it become the hub for all the regions that surround it, a city neither eastern nor western but both at the same time. It still is, but for how much longer?

As we sit drinking coffee around the corner from the British consulate, gazing calmly at yet another high-sided vehicle that could be carrying 500lbs of cheap explosives, my brother has difficulty keeping up the front. No matter how hard he tries, his memories of the first and nearest bomb keep crowding into his mind. The worst part was seeing the dead in the street and recognising their faces. He tells me about the disembodied hand he saw sticking out of a mound of broken glass. He can't help wondering if this was the hand that detonated the bomb that killed his neighbourhood. "It's not just politics," he says. "They're attacking our way of life."

He is determined to stay, he tells me. All the other Istanbullus-from-elsewhere I know are telling me the same thing. The city is in a bad and dangerous place right now, stuck as it is between two armies of fundamentalists. The nearness of these bombs makes it feel as if they are closing in. But it has also made us remember what we treasure about this city, and why we are not going to give it up without a fight.

guardian.co.uk



To: Dayuhan who wrote (17658)11/25/2003 3:51:06 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793717
 
Iraqi Security Forces Torn Between Loyalties
Work for U.S. Leaves Recruits Uneasy

By Anthony Shadid
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, November 25, 2003; Page A01

BAIJI, Iraq -- At the sprawling Baiji train station, long ago looted of everything but rail cars, the men of the city's Iraqi Civil Defense Corps lamented their first two months as a pillar of the U.S.-trained security forces that will inherit responsibility for keeping order in Iraq.

In a Sunni Muslim town suspicious of U.S. forces and often the scene of armed opposition, villagers have derided the men of the 3rd Patrol as traitors, pelting them with rocks as their trucks pass. Some were stopped in the market by men in checkered head scarves and warned that their commander faced death. Last month, U.S. Special Forces mistook them for guerrillas or thieves -- that point remains in dispute -- and opened fire on them. Worse, they feared, was what lay ahead if U.S. forces withdrew from this northern town.

"I swear to God, we'll be killed," said Hamid Yusuf, holding a secondhand Kalashnikov rifle.

"We all have the same opinion," insisted one of his commanders, Qassim Khalaf.

"One hundred percent," answered Jamal Awad, another patrol member.

"My family's already made a reservation on a plot of land to bury me," said Yusuf, 29, breaking into a grin as the men traded barbs tinged with gallows humor. "As soon as they leave, I'm taking off my hat," he said, tipping his red baseball cap emblazoned with the corps' emblem, "and putting on a yashmak," the head scarf sometimes worn by resistance fighters.

The U.S. administration in Iraq has high hopes for the Civil Defense Corps and other forces it is aggressively training, projecting them as an eventual alternative to the 130,000 American troops in Iraq. Some members have performed with remarkable bravery, and dozens have died in the recent wave of car bombings across Iraq. But Yusuf and the other men with the unit in Baiji -- a scared, disheartened and confused lot -- embody the challenge facing Iraqi forces as a new institution in a country still taking shape.

In their conversations over a day at the train station -- hours of monotony punctuated by minutes of action -- they provided a glimpse of Iraq's ambitions for the future and a sobering lesson about its present. The men of the 3rd Patrol are haunted by unanswered questions. Are they fighting for the United States or Iraq? Are they traitors or patriots? And at what cost do they sacrifice ideals of faith, nationalism and tradition, the essence of their identity?

"We have children, we have families and we need to live," said Yusuf, sitting with the others on a stack of railroad ties, as a brisk wind blew over them. "We don't love the Americans, but we need the money. It's very difficult, but there's no alternative."

The eight men of the 3rd Patrol were trained and equipped by Lt. Col. Larry "Pepper" Jackson, the commander in Baiji, who works by a credo that has made the military in Iraq a marvel of improvisation. Adapt to what you have, he said, and work through the challenges. So far, he has outfitted 198 members of the civil defense force, along with more than 450 Iraqi police officers. As elsewhere in the country, the pace of induction has picked up markedly in recent weeks under the rubric of "Iraqification." Of the 131,000 Iraqis under arms -- more than twice the figure of Oct. 1 -- 8,500 are in the Civil Defense Corps, a contingent that will eventually grow to 40,000.

Jackson put his recruits through three weeks of training -- drilling, marksmanship, first aid and basic combat skills. "And I'm talking basic combat skills," he said. He dealt with the language barrier and even established some camaraderie with the recruits -- some call him captain or general, whichever sounds more senior. He faces no target number for enlistment, but was told to work as fast as he could and recruit as many people as possible. He said he felt induction was proceeding at "the right pace," but that, in the end, it wasn't up to him.

"What's to say what's too fast? I don't know," Jackson said. "That's the thousand-dollar question. What's too fast?"

Either way, he said, the goal remained the same -- to turn authority over to Iraqis sooner rather than later.

"I try to tell them it's not loyalty to me, it's loyalty to your community," he said. "I tell them, 'What are you going to do when it's just you downtown? That's what you need to be trained and prepared for, because eventually that's going to come.' "

'What Can We Do?'

Baiji, about 130 miles north of Baghdad, sits at the tip of the Sunni Triangle, a swath of territory in northern and western Iraq from which former president Saddam Hussein drew most of his support. But its history with the former government tells only part of the story. It is also a region shaped by tribal traditions and reflexive nationalism, stitched together by a fierce interpretation of Islam. Those questions of identity are even more resonant now. The Sunni Muslims who long held sway in this country, where Shiite Muslims make up the majority, face a future without an organized voice, clinging to the privileges to which they have grown accustomed.

The men in the 3rd Patrol share those fears and feelings of insecurity. Perhaps more than anyone else, they understand the difficulty posed by Jackson's advice. They say they are torn between loyalties to family and faith, country and personal welfare. They have yet to determine where they stand.

The clergy in Baiji, they recalled, had praised those fighting U.S. soldiers as sacred warriors and condemned those working with American forces as infidels. One cleric, they said, had insisted that they could not fast during the holy month of Ramadan, when Muslims abstain from food or drink from sunrise to sunset. As collaborators with infidels, the cleric's reasoning went, they were infidels as well. Raised listening to the clergy, many of the men said they did not disagree with that logic.

"Under Islam, you should not shake hands with Americans, you should not eat with Americans, you should not help the Americans," said Shakir Mohammed, 23, a deputy commander of his patrol.

"Islam doesn't accept it," added Yusuf.

"But what can we do?" Mohammed asked. "You have to work. It's my job."

Awad, 25, gaunt like the others, shook his head. It was a gesture at once confused and despairing. "We can quit working with the Americans. Fine," he said. "But will the clergy give us salaries?"

Mohammed grinned at the idea. "They pay us," he said, "and we'll stop working with the Americans."

"Money is good," Yusuf said, kissing his hand with flair. "Clothes and food for my children. This is the good thing. Should I sleep without dinner and not work with the Americans? No. I should work with the Americans and have dinner."

Yusuf and most of his colleagues make $130 a month, a respectable salary in a city where U.S.-provided jobs in security are among the few available. The more senior officers in the corps make $140 or $175. All of them hail from large families -- the smallest with six members, the largest with 14. Nearly all belonged to the now-disbanded Iraqi army, and many have young children at home.

On their twice-weekly, 24-hour shifts, they sleep on a tile floor in a room with no windows, bringing blankets from home. They brew tea in a charred kettle and share a cup fashioned from the bottom of a plastic water bottle. Each day of Ramadan, adhering to the fast despite the cleric's judgment, they dispatch one colleague to bring food from the market for the evening meal.

Like soldiers anywhere, they complain most about what they don't have: cars, radios, bulletproof vests, new uniforms, boots and, in a town where attacks have tripled since July, more ammunition. They trade stories about close calls, most hauntingly about the time they came under fire from Special Forces troops a month ago.

Versions of the story conflict. Jackson, acknowledging the sequence of events was "a little sketchy," said the civil defense patrol traded fire with a dozen or so looters at the rail yards. A Special Forces unit arrived and started shooting. In the end, Jackson said, three or four members of the 3rd Patrol were wounded. Yusuf and his colleagues put the number at five.

"Some guys got caught in cross-fire. It was nothing intentional," Jackson said. "There was a lot of confusion. In war, sometimes that happens. War doesn't go perfectly. My concern was taking care of them and their families. That was my concern."

Yusuf and his colleagues acknowledged that the wounded were taken to a U.S. military hospital and given the best care possible. But they dispute the contention that looters were present or that they fired before being shot at. They insist the Special Forces soldiers mistook them for guerrillas. In a fusillade of fire that one of them compared to a horror movie, they said they ran for cover, scattering their lunch of potatoes, tomatoes and bread. Trails of blood, blackened by time, are still smeared across the train platform.

"We were yelling, 'Civil defense! Civil defense!' " said Khalaf, the unit's leader.

One of their colleagues, Alaa Nasser, 21, was critically wounded in both legs and remains in a hospital in Baghdad. His colleagues said he needs $425 for an operation. The four others have yet to return to work.

"Only Rambo could have handled the situation," Awad said.

An Emotional Toll

In Baiji's atmosphere of unease, other young men in the city express amazement that the 3rd Patrol is still working. Latif Sayyib makes $2 a day as a carpenter, when he can find work. His brother, Wathban, works at the electric utility. No amount of money, they said, would persuade them to face the risks entailed in joining security forces that they contend are indelibly tainted by the occupation.

They grew up with Yusuf and some of the others, attending school together or playing soccer in the city's dusty streets. Suspicion is so intense in the city that they do their best to avoid contact with their old friends.

"I don't want to see them," Latif said, sitting in his home. "I'll see them in their house, but if I see them in the street or the market, I'll only stay a minute or two because I fear I'll become a target."

His brother nodded.

"Their destiny will be the same as it was in Vietnam," Wathban said. "The Americans left their allies there and they were killed. I think the same will happen here."

In the streets of Baiji, graffiti clutters the walls, tinted black by fires at the city's oil refinery. "Anyone dealing with the Americans will be killed," says one slogan, scrawled by hand. "Saddam will be back, you traitors," warns another.

"The people here don't forget our faces," Mohammed said.

When the men of the 3rd Patrol were training, they said, children threw rocks at them. Awad said he was hit in the back, and had to be kept in bed for three days. Several times, they were pelted with tomatoes as they drove through the vegetable market. They tried to bring civilian clothes with them and change into their uniforms on the job. When they did, their commander threatened to dock $5 from their pay.

Fear has prompted three of the men to leave in the past month, and nearly everyone said they had thought about it.

"Sometimes when I'm in a taxi, I hear the insults," Mohammed said. "I hear them say, 'These people working with the civil defense are traitors, they're agents. Their future will be grim.' "

"It stays in our heart," Awad said.

"We're scared, I swear to God," Yusuf said. "We don't know at what moment we'll be killed. We don't know what will happen tomorrow." Mohammed interrupted him. "Tomorrow? In 15 minutes, we don't know what will happen."

Dusk arrived by late afternoon, as it does during winter in Iraq. The men chatted about the Americans, about their city and their country. It was the talk so familiar in Baiji -- confused, contradictory and ambiguous. Some were fond of Jackson and the soldiers they had met, but angry at the idea of an occupation. Some insisted that the guerrillas were fighting only for money. In the same breath, they insisted that the United States had come for Iraq's resources and that overthrowing Hussein was an afterthought.

"Some people say when the Americans take all our oil, they'll leave," Yusuf said. "They'll leave us to kill each other."

As night approached, they gathered wood for their fire. Dinner arrived -- tomatoes, cucumbers and parsley in a black plastic bag. In a looted warehouse littered with charred wood and shattered glass and concrete, they gathered around -- "like brothers," Mohammed said, in a town that is remarkably unfraternal. And over cigarettes, they talked about what they hoped from their future.

"I want my children to live in safety," said Khalaf, 33.

"We want to be like Kuwait. We want to live in luxury," Yusuf said. " We want fancy cars, not the worn-out cars we have."

"Health," Awad volunteered.

Mohammed nodded his head, then added another. "We don't want to always be scared."
guardian.co.uk



To: Dayuhan who wrote (17658)11/25/2003 4:51:24 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793717
 
Morris lays out the road we are on. The question is, how long will it take to travel it?

Dick Morris
The Political Life

The Guantanamo solution

While Americans are patient with George Bush, even with the incessant drip of deaths, they will not be willing to put up with many more months of combat casualties. To ask them to do so would be to strain our resolve and sap our strength. It would squander the determination Sept. 11 left in our national soul to see the war on terror to its conclusion.

The difference between Iraq and Vietnam is that the Asian war lasted for a decade and consumed 58,000 American lives while the Iraq conflict has lasted for only a few months and tragically killed 330 U.S. troops. To let this bloodshed drag on for many more months would be to risk the same national alienation that marked the Vietnam era.

The solution is, of course, to turn over the administration of Iraq and its government to Iraqi hands as soon as possible. President Bush is correct in demanding of Paul Bremer, head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, that it be done quickly. He is right for ordering that the turnover begin even before elections can be held. But he is wrong to insist that the U.S. forces stay, en masse, until democracy is created.

The ultimate answer is to withdraw most American troops from Iraq even before perfection sets in — while preserving a base in the Baghdad area with 30,000 or so American troops to keep an eye on the troubled country. This base should be self-contained, as is the U.S. outpost in Cuba at Guantanamo, with troops never venturing into the surrounding country. It should be possible to develop a sufficiently secure perimeter under these conditions to stop ongoing casualties.

Should things get worse in Iraq or the Baath Party leaders come back into power, the United States could easily intervene. Otherwise, let the Iraqis decide their own fate. Iraqis have been killing one another for centuries, and we should not make it our mission to restore a perfect peace.

Nothing will help Bush’s reelection chances more than the withdrawal of significant numbers of troops from Iraq before Election Day. With a good economy and troops coming home, what is the opposition to use against him but the memory of a recession and questions about whether we should have decided to fight the war initially? Memory makes a terrible basis for a political campaign.

In his 2000 presidential campaign, Bush was quite clear in his opposition to nation-building. He argued that it squandered our resources, stretched our military too thin and undermined our combat readiness. He was right then, and his argument bears special weight now. If nation-building, at no price, was wrong in his view in Bosnia, how can it be right now in Iraq at a huge cost of American lives?

Presidents must always make sure not to become stuck in a situation where events spin beyond their control. Harry Truman in Korea, Lyndon Johnson in Vietnam, Richard Nixon in Watergate, Jimmy Carter in the Iran hostage crisis, the first George Bush in the recession and Bill Clinton in impeachment all serve as examples.

The president must not become stuck in Iraq. He needs to avoid a commitment to a utopian ending and settle for what is possible within pragmatic limits.

It was very important to topple Saddam Hussein. It is crucial that his ilk not be allowed back in power in Iraq. However, it is not nearly as important that Iraq become a model for the Middle East. We all wish it were so, but the price in lives may be too high for us to tolerate.

The Guantanamo solution protects our vital interests at no cost in American lives, even as it contemplates an imperfect end to the Iraq war. Bush’s invasion is amply justified by the fact that one of the most horrific leaders since Hitler is now removed from power. An ongoing U.S. military presence in the region will ensure that he will continue to be deprived of the power to torture, maim, gas and kill his countrymen.

Only in fairy tales do the protagonists live happily ever after. Wars are messy, with endings that are less soothing. But it is not worth the price in national treasure or combat casualties to seek such a conclusion.

Good enough will have to do.
thehill.com



To: Dayuhan who wrote (17658)11/25/2003 7:02:31 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793717
 
The Eastern Europeans have a good understanding of what it is like to live in a "Command Economy." And they don't like the way the Brussels' Bureaucrats are turning the EU into one.

Czech warns Europe of 'dream world' woes
By Arnaud de Borchgrave
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published November 25, 2003

Czech President Vaclav Klaus said Europeans are living in a "dream world" of welfare and long vacations and have yet to realize "they are not moving toward some sort of nirvana."
The Czech Republic is a candidate for European Union membership, but Mr. Klaus, who was elected president in February, made clear in an interview his distaste for the organization.
However, he conceded during a visit to Washington last week that "the political unification of Europe" is now in "an accelerated process ... in all aspects and in all respects."
Mr. Klaus said the movement toward a single political entity of 25 European nations "will not change until people start thinking and realizing they are not moving toward some sort of nirvana."
The Czech president remains convinced that "you cannot have democratic accountability in anything bigger than a nation state."
Asked whether he could see the nation-state disappearing, Mr. Klaus replied, "That could well be the case, [but] it remains to be seen whether it will be the nominal disappearance or the real disappearance.
"We could see the scaffolding of a nation-state that would retain a president and similar institutions, but with virtually zero influence," he said "That's my forecast. And it's not a reassuring vision of the future."
Last week, the European Court of Auditors in Luxembourg released a 400-page report that found "systematic problems, over-estimations, faulty transactions, significant errors and other shortcomings" in the EU budget.
EU auditors could vouch for only 10 percent of the $120 billion the bloc spent in 2002. It was the ninth successive year the auditors were unable to certify the budget as a whole.
Europeans have not yet faced up to such "serious underlying issues," Mr. Klaus said, because "they are still in the dream world of welfare, long vacations, guaranteed high pensions and cradle-to-grave social security."
The biggest challenge for the Czech Republic, Mr. Klaus said, is to avoid falling into the trap of "a new form of collectivism." Asked whether he meant a new form of neo-Marxism, he said, "Absolutely not, but I see other sectors endangering free societies.
"The enemies of free societies today are those who want to burden us down again with layer upon layer of regulations," Mr. Klaus said.
"We had that in communist times. But now if you look at all the new rules and regulations of EU membership, layered bureaucracy is staging a comeback."
The European Union's 30,000 bureaucrats have produced some 80,000 pages of regulations that the Czech Republic and the other applicants for EU membership will have to adopt.
Mr. Klaus dismissed anti-Americanism in Europe, which he sees as "more a reflection of American anti-Europeanism than European anti-Americanism."
He said those who organize demonstrations in Europe are a tiny minority of the population. "The majority doesn't care to demonstrate."
Asked about the U.S.-led war on terrorism, Mr. Klaus said, "It is quite normal that the principal targets of al Qaeda are the U.S. and the UK, as they have taken the lead to do something about those who launch the terrorist attacks.
"We understand the fragility and vulnerability of today's world and we know these attacks are coming close to us, but as someone from a small country, I have a tendency to take domestic issues first and then look at the external ones."
The Czech Republic is one of 33 nations with troops in Iraq, but Mr. Klaus has been critical of the postwar transition to an Iraqi civilian government.
"My concern was always what to do after the end of the war because I know something about the transition from a totalitarian regime to a free society," he said. "This cannot be done by soldiers, or by foreigners.
"After we won back our freedom at the end of the Cold War, there was a proposal to bring back Czechs who had escaped to Western countries and make up a new government of those people who had been living in free countries.
"Those who had lived the tragic communist experience said no to the idea of foreigners organizing our transition back to freedom. We said we had to do this ourselves without outside influence dictating what we should do."
• Arnaud de Borchgrave, editor at large of The Washington Times, is also editor at large of United Press International.
washingtontimes.com