Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: quehubo who wrote (27423)	11/25/2003 8:40:48 AM
From: Tomas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206176

The Energy Bill: All Pork and No Beef - Raymond James’ Energy "Stat of the Week", November 24 "The bill’s provisions as they relate to oil and gas will not materially change the dwindling supply of domestic petroleum or encourage energy companies to spend more money extracting oil and gas from the ground. The dramatic increase in ethanol mandates makes this bill more of a farm bill than an energy bill." rjcapitalmarkets.com

To: quehubo who wrote (27423)	11/25/2003 5:20:21 PM
From: Ed Ajootian	Respond to of 206176

que, Agreed, it was helpful to me see the "demand destruction" myth so roundly refuted as it was by Andy. The fact that natty futures are still sticking in the high 4's even with a warmer than normal Fall seems to say the futures traders have bought into Andy's way of thinking. With us now being just weeks away from the 12th straight month of having the average Nymex HH Natgas contract be priced > $4.50, it seems pretty safe to say that we have in fact made the "step change" to $4.50 gas that Marshall Adkins was calling for about a year ago I believe. Actually I think he was calling for $5 but who's gonna quibble about pennies? <g>