SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Amots who wrote (3969)11/25/2003 12:30:55 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Respond to of 22250
 
Dissidents shadow Arab leaders in fight for democracy
By Mohamad Bazzi
March 27 2002

It has become a ritual at major gatherings of world leaders: Dissidents hold alternative or "shadow" meetings to press for change and demand a greater say in their governments' decisions.

In the Arab world, where political power is often inherited and free speech is seen as a threat, such a public challenge to government authority has been unheard of.

Yet for the first time, a coalition of Arab human rights groups and non-governmental organisations is meeting in Beirut before this week's Arab League summit. The activists hope to take advantage of the international spotlight on the most anticipated Arab summit in years. They plan to lobby government leaders to allow greater civil liberties, remove restrictions on the press and free speech and move towards free elections.

The summit, due to begin today, is expected to adopt a proposal unveiled last month by Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah that offers "full normalisation of relations" with Israel in exchange for Israel's full withdrawal from land captured in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.

Like their government leaders, the dissidents are focused on the Arab-Israeli conflict and the latest Palestinian uprising against Israel. But the activists argue that victims of government repression in many Arab countries share a plight similar to Palestinians living under Israeli rule.

advertisement

advertisement

"We can't fight for the rights of Palestinians without being free and democratic in our own countries," said Ziad Abdel-Samad, executive director of the Arab Network for Development, a Lebanese-based group that organised the alternative summit. "We need to have democratic governments that will encourage social development, fight corruption and allow a freedom of expression."

The Arab world, home to more than 250 million people in 22 countries, is the region that has been least touched by democratic reforms in the 1980s and '90s. There is not one Arab leader today who was elected in a free and fair election.

Several leaders, including Jordan's King Abdullah II and Syria's President Bashar Assad, inherited power after their
fathers' deaths.

This lack of democracy has fuelled a sense of disappointment among many Arabs that they are members of failed societies in which Arab unity has been only a dream. Oil did not bring prosperity; more than 50 years of war with Israel did not bring victory, and political reforms that swept the world from Latin America to Africa did not bring democracy to the Arab "nation".

Organisers of the alternative two-day meeting, which began on Monday, acknowledge that they face a monumental challenge. Organisers said that the meeting, which involves about 100 activists from 12 Arab countries, was kept small so it would stay focused on its key platform.

"There are very few models of democratic institutions in the Arab world. That makes our work very difficult," said Abdel Basset Hassan of the Arab Institute for Human Rights. Organisers were inspired by last month's World Social Forum in Porto Alegre, Brazil, which was billed as an alternative to the World Economic Forum held in New York.

Mr Abdel-Samad said the group planned to issue a statement urging Arab leaders to ensure that "the right of return" for more than three million Palestinian refugees was included in any final peace plan adopted by the summit.

The initial Saudi proposal has been criticised by many Palestinians and some Arab governments for not dealing with the issue of land that Palestinian refugees lost in the creation of Israel in 1948.

"Arab rulers must listen to their societies and not give away the Palestinians' right of return," Mr Abdel-Samad said. "We might not succeed in influencing them this time, but this is a long-term process. We plan to have a presence at every summit from now on."

Analysts say the fact that the alternative meeting took place at all is a sign that there is a longing for democratic reforms and greater civil liberties in the Arab world, but they caution that Arab governments are slow in responding to public pressure and popular movements.

"It's certainly a healthy development, but this meeting alone is not going to change the status quo," said Muhammad Ali Khalidi, a philosophy professor at the American University of Beirut.

"This is the kind of movement that, over a long period of time, could put Arab leaders' feet to the fire and make them accountable to their people."

Professor Khalidi noted that the alternative meeting might not have been possible if the Arab summit was being held somewhere other than Beirut, the Lebanese capital, which has had a long tradition of openness.

- Newsday



To: Amots who wrote (3969)11/25/2003 12:38:01 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Respond to of 22250
 
THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, MONDAY, MAY 7, 2001 (A1)

HOW TINY QATAR JARS ARAB MEDIA
A SATELLITE TV CHANNEL BEAMS UNCENSORED NEWS. ITS 30 MILLION LISTENERS CAN'T DO WITHOUT; OFTEN, THEIR LEADERS COULD.

By DAVAN MAHARAJ
Times Staff Writer

DOHA, Qatar--Arab kings in their gilded palaces tune in every night. Goatherding Bedouins living in ramshackle huts in Israel's Negev desert don't miss a broadcast. On many nights, the regulars at Anaheim's Al Basha Cafe, a popular hangout for Arab expatriates, wouldn't dream of changing the channel on the big-screen television.

They're all glued to Al Jazeera, a 24-hour satellite channel beamed out of the Qatari desert that offers what no other news outlet can: uncensored information and commentary from an Arab perspective.

Watched by tens of millions across the globe, Al Jazeera's coverage of the Palestinians' revolt against Israeli occupation is now helping to unite the Arab world.

For Arab viewers, Al Jazeera is to the intifada against Israel what CNN was to the Persian Gulf War. The channel's blanket coverage has put pressure on Arab governments to play a more active role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In fact, Israeli and Arab critics charge that the channel helps stoke the violence.

The station's news and talk shows tackle topics considered haraam, or forbidden, in the Arab world, including polygamy, women's rights and the role of ancient Islamic law in Arab society. Some programs go further, providing platforms for political dissidents who question the legitimacy of autocratic Arab regimes.

"We're seeing a sea change in the Arab media thanks to Al Jazeera," said Jon B. Alterman, a Middle East expert at the U.S. Institute of Peace in Washington. "Al Jazeera is . . . forcing other broadcasters to compete. It is breaking down walls of censorship and expanding the realm of what people in Arab countries can talk about."

The station is part of an attempt by Qatar's reformist leader to transform his devoutly Muslim nation into a modern society where women have the right to vote and citizens enjoy the benefits of a free press.

"We're playing a strange kind of music," said Mohammed Jasem al Ali, managing director of Al Jazeera, which means "the Peninsula" in Arabic.

Governments Complain to Foreign Ministry

Many Arab governments find Al Jazeera's tune jarring. Hardly a day goes by without one of the other Arab states complaining to the Qatari Foreign Ministry that a program resulted in slander, loss of national prestige or simply hurt feelings.

Jordan, Kuwait and Yasser Arafat's Palestinian Authority have on occasion shut down Al Jazeera news bureaus in protest. (Palestinian security forces briefly shuttered the channel's West Bank office after the station broadcast old footage from Lebanon's civil war of a demonstrator holding shoes over a picture of Arafat.)

Neighboring Bahrain and Saudi Arabia won't permit Al Jazeera reporters on their soil. Morocco, Libya and several other Arab countries have recalled their ambassadors to Qatar to protest shows or news reports critical of their regimes.

Algeria even cut off power to several major cities after authorities learned that Al Jazeera was planning to broadcast a show about the government's repressive actions during the country's bloody civil war.

Yet Al Jazeera is spawning imitators across the Middle East. Satellite stations in nearby Dubai and Abu Dhabi and in Lebanon now try to cover news in the same freewheeling style. Even the Voice of America, on a mission to expand its presence in the Arab world, recently pleaded with Al Jazeera to broadcast its programs. After officials at the Qatari channel politely declined, the VOA said it would open a radio station in Qatar.

Azmi Bishara, an Arab member of the Israeli parliament, says Al Jazeera has restored some credibility to the Arab media.

"Pan-Arabism never dreamed of conditions like this, in which the whole Arab world has broadcasts that are received simultaneously in every country in literary Arabic," Bishara told an Israeli newspaper recently.

The estimated 30 million Arabs who tune in to Al Jazeera have one man to thank: Sheik Hamad ibn Khalifa al Thani, the 51-year-old emir of Qatar, an oil-rich nation slightly larger than Los Angeles County. Hamad overthrew his father in a bloodless coup nearly six years ago, when the elder Thani was vacationing in Switzerland.

Decrees Indicate Desire to Create Modern State

Since then, Hamad has issued decree upon decree indicating that he wants to transform his Persian Gulf nation of about 150,000 citizens and 600,000 guest workers--mainly from India, Pakistan and some Arab countries--into a modern democracy.

In 1999, Hamad decreed that women could vote and even run for seats on a council that advises him. Elected government is a radical idea in Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, where strict Islamic laws demand, among other things, that women who venture outside the home be covered from head to toe. Allowing women to run for office or even vote is considered extreme.

One of Hamad's first decrees was to abolish Qatar's Information Ministry, which was responsible for censorship. In 1996, Hamad approved $150 million--to be spent over five years--to launch Al Jazeera.

Analysts say Al Jazeera, which aired its first broadcast in November 1996, began to satisfy a yearning in the Arab world for unexpurgated news. Until then, Arabs often remarked that they tuned in to radio and television stations in Europe to find out what was happening in their own countries. In the rest of the Arab world, state-run television news programs are stuffed with reverential footage of the king, emir or president welcoming or sending off foreign dignitaries--sometimes even low-level diplomats.

During the 1990s, millions of Arabs took advantage of the plunging prices of satellite dishes to keep abreast of news and entertainment. By some estimates, more than 80% of all Saudi homes, for example, have access to satellite television.

The proliferation of satellite dishes has led to an explosion of channels in the region. Al Jazeera and about 30 other satellite stations now broadcast in Arabic to the region. Even Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed fundamentalist group based in Lebanon, has its own satellite broadcasts.

The trend is a nightmare for Arab governments accustomed to determining what kinds of information their masses receive. Thanks to technology, censors cannot get their hands on Al Jazeera and other stations that freely beam news and information across borders.

Al Jazeera has been credited with playing a major role in mobilizing support for the Palestinians and sustaining their 7-month-old intifada.

Arabs from the Persian Gulf to North Africa to the United States now watch footage of Palestinians clashing with Israeli forces. Middle East experts say Al Jazeera has united Arabs behind a single issue for the first time since the early 1970s, when Um Kalthoum, the legendary Egyptian diva, rallied the entire Arab world with her stirring monthly radio concerts.

Walid al Omary, the station's correspondent in the West Bank, said his two cell phones ring around the clock with news tips, many of them from Palestinians in far-flung villages.

"It's not easy, because every village wants their clashes or their bombings to be on Al Jazeera," Omary said. "Some of them say if it's not on Al Jazeera, it might as well not have happened."

Most Palestinians Turn to Station, Expert Says

About 78% of Palestinians now turn to Al Jazeera for their information, according to Nabil Khatib, director of the Media Institute at Birzeit University in the West Bank.

Several Arab governments, including Egypt and Jordan, have stated that Al Jazeera's coverage of the intifada threatens the stability of their regimes and has unfairly exposed them to criticism that they have failed to adequately support the Palestinians.

Egypt and Jordan have been more critical of Al Jazeera than has Israel, which worries that the station's coverage helps incite Palestinians to riot yet continues to allow its correspondents to operate freely within its borders.

In the Al Jazeera newsroom, chief editor Salah Negm dismissed criticism that the channel adds to the violence. And Arab leaders, he said, have to get used to the fact that Al Jazeera is not going to carry water for their regimes.

Negm said the same people who accuse Al Jazeera of inciting violence also attacked the station as pro-Zionist when it interviewed then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and other Jewish leaders.

"Everyone here understands that news value rules," Negm said. "We'll be out of business in no time if we feel the need to be sensitive to this king or that government."

Al Jazeera has scored scoop after scoop in the Arab world. When the U.S. bombed sites near Baghdad in February, Al Jazeera was the first to carry live pictures. CNN followed 15 minutes later with Al Jazeera's footage.

In January, the channel broadcast pictures of the fugitive most wanted by the United States, Osama bin Laden, at the wedding of his son in Afghanistan. Several months earlier, Al Jazeera scored an exclusive interview with the Saudi militant.

If Al Jazeera's news broadcasts offend some Arab governments, then "Opposite Directions," a live two-hour weekly current affairs show hosted by Faisal al Kasim, makes them boil with anger.

Kasim, a BBC veteran with a doctorate in English literature, invites two guests with opposing views to wrestle with a variety of political, cultural and economic issues. The guests take calls from viewers across the Arab world. (Libyan leader Moammar Kadafi called in once to talk about Arab nationalism. He appeared as a guest on another segment even though he had recalled his ambassador to Qatar to protest a program featuring Libyan dissidents.)

Videotapes of Kasim's show, especially those questioning Islamic orthodoxy, fetch up to $100 on the black market.

Kasim, the 38-year-old son of a Syrian peasant farmer, said he delights in promoting diverse views and stirring up fierce debate.

"These shows are quite ordinary for Western viewers, but it is revolutionary for Arabs," Kasim said. "For 50 years, the media in the Arab world have been feeding people nothing but lies. Now it is getting impossible to hide the truth from the people."

For now, Al Jazeera plans to dish out even more information. The channel is considering 24-hour financial news and documentary channels.

Al Jazeera, according to station officials, is beginning to break even, earning revenue from cable subscriptions, sales of programs and advertisements.

Most of the 300,000 daily page views on Al Jazeera's Arabic-language Web site originate from North America, he said. Al Jazeera's list of nearly 200,000 subscribers in the United States and Canada is growing by 2,500 weekly, according to Jasem al Ali, the station's managing director.

Mo Rayad, manager of Al Basha Cafe in Anaheim, said that many patrons--among the 300,000 to 400,000 Arabs and Arab Americans in the Southland--subscribe to Al Jazeera at home but come to the cafe to sip tea or Turkish coffee, watch the news and discuss the day's events with their friends.

Ghassan Dib, a Palestinian American who lives in Montgomery, Ala., said the 25 Arab families there depend on Al Jazeera for news about the intifada. Dib, a used-car salesman, pays $24.95 a month for Al Jazeera and six other Arabic channels on Echostar Communications' Dish Network.

"I don't know what we would do without it," Dib said.

----------------------------
Maharaj was recently on assignment in Jerusalem and Qatar.



To: Amots who wrote (3969)11/25/2003 12:44:40 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Respond to of 22250
 
Arab countries do not claim to be democracies, but Israel does! That's the important point. Zionist and their Jewish-American apologists use the myth that Isreal is a democracy in order to advance the racist ideology of Zionism. Zionist ideology is founded on race and religion. Ninety percent of all Israeli land is set aside in a JEWISH TRUST where only Jews have access to this land. The national Law of Return is clearly a racist law. The millions of Palestinian refugees expelled by Israeli aggression are forbidden to return to their 1500 year old ancestral lands while foreign Khazar Jews from Russia who have NO ethnic links to the land are given automatic citizenship. The UN and the entire world community are fully aware that non-Jews in Israel are treated as second class citizens.

Israel claims to be a democracy to tap into the hundreds of billions of American tax dollars but in fact they are a racist Jewish theocracy where the Babylonian Talmud is the ONLY constitution that the Israeli Jews live by. The JEwish Talmud does not even recognized Christian and Moslem Palestinian as human beings.



To: Amots who wrote (3969)11/25/2003 12:55:10 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
According to an American economist lecturing at the US War College, the total cost of Israel is something like $1.6 TRILLION since 1973. That's right, not billions but trillions! That amounts to something like $2 million dollars for each Jewish family of four living in Israel.
Obscene is the only word to define this.

The entire one billion Moslem community of the world has not even received a fraction of this foreign aid although the majority of Moslem countries are far worst economically than Israel.

And how does Israel and their Jewish-American Trojan Horse pull this off? They use their control of the media to cry Holocaust and antisemitism and Congress quickly approves another $14 billion (this was the latest welfare check for Israel when America faces a $500 billion deficit.) The Jewish-American community is blackmailing the US Congress to borrow billions using the good credit of the American taxpayers to advance the Jewish agenda in Israel.

The principle of Separation of Church and State is totally abandoned when it comes to the religion of Judaism/Israel.



To: Amots who wrote (3969)12/3/2003 3:42:05 PM
From: Elmer Flugum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22250
 
Arabs Pay The Price Of Nazism, French Jews Pay The Price Of ZioNazism

Attacks by Arabs on Jews in France Revive Old Fears

nytimes.com

December 3, 2003

By ELAINE SCIOLINO

GAGNY, France, Nov. 26 — The boys hide their skullcaps under baseball caps. The girls tuck their Star of David necklaces under their sweaters. Their school in this middle-class suburb east of Paris has been scorched by fire and fear, and those are the off-campus rules.

Early one Saturday in November, unidentified vandals set fire to the new two-story wing of the Merkaz Hatorah School for Orthodox Jews that was set to open as an elementary school in January.

The fire prompted President Jacques Chirac to call an emergency cabinet meeting and declare that "an attack on a Jew is an attack against France."

It also intensified an agonizing debate over the definition and extent of anti-Semitism today in France, and indeed all of Europe, and forced the French government to redouble its efforts to combat it.

But even as they praise their government for acting swiftly, some French Jews, particularly working-class and middle-class Jews of North African origin, are convinced that France is not entirely safe for them. They say the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the American occupation of Iraq have morphed into a battleground for French Arab Muslims to attack Jews. "We Jews in France are paying the price for the events on the ground in the Middle East that are seen from morning to night here on satellite television," said Marc Aflalo, a printer who proudly wears a skullcap and whose three children go to Merkaz Hatorah, a private school of 800 elementary and high school students.

If a Jew goes into an Arab Muslim neighborhood, he says, "You have to carry an umbrella to protect yourself from the stones that fly."

This is not a revival of the old anti-Jewish hatred of the right that infused Europe before the Vatican reconciled with the Jews in the 1960's, but a playing out of the Arab-Israeli conflict in the streets and salons of France.

France is home to about 600,000 Jews — the world's largest Jewish population except for those of Israel and the United States — but also as many as 10 times that number of Muslims of Arab origin, the largest such population in Europe, many of them young, poor and unemployed.

Complicating matters, public opinion throughout Europe is broadly critical of Israeli policy toward the Palestinians. A recent public opinion poll of European Union countries found that most citizens believed that Israel was the greatest threat to world peace, followed by Iran, North Korea and the United States.

The poll itself added to the debate about anti-Semitism in Europe. But it is in France, where the burden of the wartime government in Vichy's collaboration with the Nazis still casts a shadow over the political landscape, that the debate is the shrillest and the charges of anti-Semitism the harshest.

Mindful of demographic realities and the strains of anti-Semitism in their country's past, French officials are struggling to denounce and punish acts of anti-Semitism without fueling racism toward France's ethnic Arab Muslim population.

Telling Parliament in November that the Middle East conflict "has entered our schools," Education Minister Luc Ferry said France was facing "a new form of anti-Semitism" that was "no longer an anti-Semitism of the extreme right," but one of "Islamic origin."

By contrast, Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy said in a television debate recently: "All those who explain the resurgence of anti-Semitism by the conflict in the Middle East say something that is false. Anti-Semitism existed before the existence of Israel."

For that reason he has called for a plan of affirmative action to help integrate Muslims into French society, a highly controversial idea in a country that officially does not identify its citizens according to race, religion or ethnicity.

Still, Mr. Sarkozy added that the horror of the Holocaust meant that anti-Semitism had to be treated differently than other forms of racism in Europe. That is a challenge when many of the young Arab Muslim youths who wander the streets have no understanding of the Holocaust.

In a book called "The Lost Territories of the Republic" published last year, a group of French teachers said teaching of the Holocaust was impossible in some classes because students of Arab origin were so hostile toward the subject.

That us-against-them attitude is echoed by students at the school in Gagny, who have little regular exposure to Muslims except for the all-Muslim cleaning staff from countries like Mali and Senegal.

The school is a sheltered place where boys and girls are taught separately, male administrators and teachers do not shake hands with women, and students learn that evolution is only one theory of creation.

"Outside of school, they call the boys in yarmulkes `dirty Jew' and they tell us to go back to our country," said a 17-year-old student of Moroccan origin who identified herself only as Siona.

After the firebombing of the school on Nov. 15, the government set up a commission to investigate incidents and classified it as a hate crime under tough legislation passed unanimously by Parliament this year. Teachers have been told to combat anti-Semitism, and the police have stepped up surveillance of synagogues and Jewish schools.

In Strasbourg a court sentenced six men in their early 20's to 18 months to three years in prison for setting off a homemade bomb in a Jewish cemetery last year. Yet even after the government initiative, swastikas were scrawled on tombs in a Jewish cemetery and on two Jewish-owned shops in Marseille.

Anti-Semitism, of course, existed before Muslims started immigrating to Europe and has continued at a low level for years despite laws all over the continent. But such incidents have not been limited to France.

Europe, broadly, has been struck in recent months by anti-Jewish acts, including arson at a synagogue near Manchester, England, in November, the defacing of headstones and the gate of a cemetery in Germany with Nazi slogans in October, a botched explosion of a vehicle loaded with gas canisters in front of a synagogue in Belgium in June and an attack on a Hasidic rabbi in Vienna as he walked home from prayers in May.

Indeed, an unpublished draft report prepared earlier this year for the European Union concluded that a wave of anti-Semitic acts had occurred since the Palestinian uprising started in 2000.

Underscoring the extreme sensitivity of the issue, the European Union group that commissioned the report said it had been poorly done and refused to release it, prompting charges among Jewish groups and the Berlin institute contracted to prepare it that the European Union was suppressing it.

Despite the findings, Interior Ministry figures show that physical and verbal attacks against Jews plummeted to 96 in the first 10 months of this year, compared with 184 during the comparable period last year. Justice Ministry investigations into alleged anti-Semitic offenses for the same periods fell from 129 to 29.

But the philosopher Alain Finkielkraut, author of "In the Name of the Other: Reflections on the Coming Anti-Semitism," for one, calls a statistical analysis of the problem an absurd way to measure it.

"There is a new, dangerous phenomenon of the Nazification of Israel that justifies hatred of Israel and therefore the Jews," he said.

One result has been a closing of ranks among some Jewish activists, which has made it more difficult for them to tolerate criticism of Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, polarizing the debate still further.

"Intellectuals who were not used to considering themselves Jewish are now doing so," said Olivier Nora, the publisher of the Éditions Grasset et Fasquelle publishing house. "The tradition in the French Jewish community is to feel French first and Jewish second, but there is more and more pressure to define yourself and to take a position on Israel's policies. You're either in or you're out."

But Theo Klein, a lawyer and former head of the umbrella group of Jewish organizations known as the Representative Council of the Jewish Institutions of France, or CRIF, urged the Jews of France not to be carried away by emotion. He criticized the government's decision to define the school firebombing as an act of anti-Semitism in the absence of conclusive proof.

"The Jews are fully integrated into French society," he said. "They should reaffirm their rights as French citizens and not set themselves up as separate."

Indeed, when Israel's ambassador to France, Nissim Zvili, said after the school fire that French Jews were so "afraid of anti-Semitic attacks that many of them are thinking of emigrating," Roger Cukierman, the current head of CRIF, called the claim "really exaggerated" and an Israeli effort to attract immigrants.

Meanwhile, Jean-Marie Le Pen, the head of the far-right National Front, who has been accused by opponents of being anti-Semitic as well as racist against the influx of Muslim immigrants to France, said in a statement that the government had overreacted to the school fire. He called the new measures against anti-Semitism "laughable," adding: "There is no rise in anti-Semitism in France. There are the inevitable effects of an untamed immigration."