SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oeconomicus who wrote (498754)11/26/2003 12:50:22 AM
From: geode00  Respond to of 769667
 
The market didn't care about the revision as it happens on schedule. Now if Shrubbery can just find those 2.3 million jobs and then make enough every month on top of that to employ everyone new coming into the job market.

news.bbc.co.uk

"...The US economy is expected to grow at the fastest rate for two decades next year, but without creating many jobs, according to a leading business survey.
The National Association for Business Economists (NABE) expects a rise in gross domestic product of 4.5% in 2004.

The survey also forecasts a jobless rate of 5.8%, slightly down on this year's unemployment of 6%....

The NABE expects productivity growth in 2004 to be about 3.7%, suggesting that stiff competition will deter businesses from hiring, preferring to work existing employees more efficiently - or harder....

But the NABE survey also predicts ever widening deficits, a likely side effect of the Bush stimulus package.

The budget deficit - the gap between federal income and expenditure - is forecast to reach a record $462.8bn in 2004.

And the NABE predicts the trade deficit - the gap between imports and exports - will reach $545bn..."



To: Oeconomicus who wrote (498754)11/26/2003 1:55:47 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
R.D.,

Re: http://www.abiworld.org/stats/1980annual.html

That was an excellent and succinct summary of the number of bankruptcies in the U.S.

Would you happen to have a URL that offers insights into the value of these bankruptcies? Perhaps the reason that there is some confusion about bankrupties in the past couple of years is the sheer scale of the losses that occurred with Enron, WorldCom and others.

TIA