SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (498779)11/26/2003 12:48:14 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
I noticed the market is up, but it is an average trajectory, a typical recessionary bouce, nothing more.

This aint no 8% GDP stock market Laz. And it aint no 8% GDP employment market, or retail christmas season. Not that I would ever accuse this administration of spin mind you... I think they aren't perceptive enough to pull it off. Nah its just stupidity and cluelessness on the part of chau and snow.

As for your argument regarding the BLS statistics, it is actually YOU who are misinterpreting them. Your assertion is that those figures, which are positive numbers are a rate of change from one period to another, in other words every quarter is an improving period in terms of dollars. Untrue- the figures moving from 4.2 -> 2.x represent a REDUCTION in real earnings.

I chose those figures because they were discussed on capital report, so they are meaningful. Since I know the RWEs used to pull out obscure farming related payroll statistics to try to explain away the non farm payrolls, I don't pay much mind to other statistics, I am certainly sure there are some out there that make Bush look like an economic wizard. Maybe those are the ones the treasury dept used to come up with the 8% GDP party we are experiencing!



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (498779)11/26/2003 3:27:07 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Do you understand the difference between "value of a function" and "rate of change of a function"? Had calculus?

No, Laz, I think she quit after struggling through geometry. For example, she just couldn't quite get the difference between acute and obtuse. ;-)