SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neeka who wrote (17825)11/26/2003 2:49:14 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793846
 
Maestro of Anti-Bushism
Angry Howard Dean.
NRO — Rich Lowry is author of Legacy: Paying the Price for the Clinton Years.

At an afternoon union rally in New York City, Howard Dean is trying to be uplifting. He is talking about progress made in the civil-rights revolution, despite awful setbacks. Dean recalls how we "lost" Martin Luther King Jr., "lost" Robert Kennedy, and "lost" schoolgirls in the Birmingham, Ala., church bombing in the 1960s. But before he can finish his riff with a burst of inspiring rhetoric, a voice rings out from the back of the hall: "Let's 'lose' George Bush!"

And so it goes on Planet Dean. Even when the former Vermont governor tries to inspire, he provokes from his audience a call — by implication — for the assassination of the president of the United States. The rule for a Dean crowd is: Don't be uplifting if you can be angry instead. Dean has sprinted to his lead in the Democratic primary race by tapping into the deep vein of liberal bitterness over President Bush. A Dean crowd doesn't just clap and wave signs — it bristles.

The New York union rally doesn't represent a typical Dean audience. Dean's momentum and his prodigious capacity to seem sincerely hacked-off have won him the endorsements of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees and the Service Employees International Union, huge unions with large minority memberships. Thus, a series of Dean union rallies around the country in recent days have allowed him to tap into a new constituency.

Heretofore, Dean rallies have had the demographic of a Phish concert: young, white liberals. It has made for a certain callow feel to Dean's candidacy: Ben & Jerry are mad, and they're not going to take it anymore! The crowd in the hall of New York's local SEIU 32BJ skews older, and black and Hispanic. On this day, Dean himself is diverse by proxy.

"Dean is one of us," local SEIU kingmaker Dennis Rivera says, pointing out that Dr. Dean was a "health care worker" just like the members of Rivera's union — never mind that none of them is a Yale-educated doctor from a well-off Manhattan family. What Dean truly shares with his audience is anger. The poster of Dean that people wave in the hall has a picture of him, not smiling like most politicians, but looking belligerent. When he comes on stage, with the sleeves of his white dress shirt rolled up, he looks like someone spoiling for a fight.

AFSCME head Gerald McEntee, by way of introducing Dean, pronounces Bush "anti-worker, anti-family, and anti-democratic." Dean takes it from there. Referring to the tax cuts, he says Bush has given $3 trillion to Enron and Ken Lay. He compares Bush's record on jobs to Herbert Hoover's, and accuses him of playing on the nation's racial divisions. And he, of course, scores Bush for allegedly misleading the nation into war in Iraq.

For a candidate whose foremost issue is opposition to the Iraq war, Dean has little to say about foreign policy. He mentions a roster of foreign countries — France, Italy, Israel, etc. — only to say that they have universal health coverage and the United States doesn't. His analysis of the North Korean crisis is that Bush just "doesn't like" Kim Jong Il enough to negotiate with him — a risible claim. His criticism of the current conduct of the Iraq war is mostly about its expense: It diverts resources from domestic priorities.

But policy is beside the point. Dean is anti-Bush rage personified. He expresses and empowers the crowd's discontent because it seems possible that his "people power" campaign can leverage its anger into victory. At the end of his speech, Dean tells the crowd, "Power to change the country is in your hands, not mine." Then he begins a chant: "You have the power!" He points with both hands out into the crowd each time he says it, like a conductor working his orchestra into a smashing finale.

Dean, with his well-funded, energetic campaign, is the maestro of anti-Bushism.

(c)2003 King Features Syndicate

nationalreview.com



To: Neeka who wrote (17825)11/26/2003 3:14:32 PM
From: kumar  Respond to of 793846
 
People on H1B visas are legal residents/workers in the USA.



To: Neeka who wrote (17825)11/27/2003 3:25:15 AM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793846
 
Net immigration rises by millions

By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

washtimes.com

Net immigration to the United States rose dramatically by 1.4 million in each of the past two years, about half a million of whom were listed as illegal aliens, a report said yesterday.
The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) said if the numbers remain unchanged, this decade will mark the most massive wave of immigration in American history, with 45 million immigrants — about 14 percent of the country's total projected population — forecast to be residing in the United States by 2010.
The extensive FAIR report also said the figures show that immigration totals are unrelated to the labor needs and economic conditions in this country. Despite a weak U.S. economy and rising unemployment in the United States since 2000, the report said, immigration significantly has outpaced record levels seen in the 1990s and has shown no sign of abating.
"Advocates of mass immigration justified the record-breaking immigration levels of the 1990s on labor-market demands during the high-tech, bubble-driven economy of that era," FAIR executive director Dan Stein said. "One would have expected that when the bubble burst, the overheated immigration would have cooled along with the economy.
"In fact, the opposite has been true," he said. "The past two years prove conclusively that immigration today is wholly unrelated to economic needs and conditions in this country."
The report, based on a study by FAIR of the U.S. Census Bureau's annual population survey for 2000 through 2002, issued in April, said an immigration base of 14 percent in 2010 nearly would double the figure posted in 1990.
FAIR is a nonprofit, public-interest organization with more than 70,000 members nationwide who support increased border enforcement to stop illegal immigration and have called for a cap on annual immigration levels of about 300,000.
In September, the U.S. Census Bureau said the foreign-born population in the United States had grown to more than 33 million in 2002, a jump of 5 percent in one year, and accounted for nearly half the country's population growth last year. The foreign-born population accounted for 44 percent of the total U.S. population growth during the year.
The FAIR report also noted that mass immigration had become a "nationwide phenomenon," meaning that it was no longer confined to a handful of states. It said North Carolina, Colorado, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and Michigan saw current rates of immigration increase by more than 100 percent during the 1990s, with North Carolina leading the way with a 355 percent increase.
New immigrants in the traditional major settlement states of New York, California, New Jersey, Florida, Texas and Illinois were running more than a quarter million immigrants higher each year than during the 1990s, the report said. It also said 19 states now receive more than double the rate of new immigrant settlements than before 2000.
"With almost every state in the country struggling to maintain vital public services and infrastructure, mass immigration is increasing the burdens on education, public health care and requiring enormous investment in new infrastructure, when local governments are hard-pressed to keep existing infrastructure funded," Mr. Stein said.
According to the report, California is projected to have more than 12 million foreign-born residents by 2010. Based on current estimates, California will have an additional 3.4 million new immigrants during this decade, as the tax-paying middle class is leaving the state for the first time in its history, the report states.
"Whatever flimsy arguments the proponents of mass immigration were able to concoct during the illusory economic boom of the late 1990s about immigration serving some national interest, they have been utterly dispelled by the reality of the post-high-tech bust," Mr. Stein said.
"Mass immigration has nothing whatsoever to do with the economic and social well-being of the United States or the American people," he said. "There is no longer even a fig leaf of national interest to cover the explicit agenda of those who promote mass immigration."
Net immigration rises by millions

By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES


Net immigration to the United States rose dramatically by 1.4 million in each of the past two years, about half a million of whom were listed as illegal aliens, a report said yesterday.
The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) said if the numbers remain unchanged, this decade will mark the most massive wave of immigration in American history, with 45 million immigrants — about 14 percent of the country's total projected population — forecast to be residing in the United States by 2010.
The extensive FAIR report also said the figures show that immigration totals are unrelated to the labor needs and economic conditions in this country. Despite a weak U.S. economy and rising unemployment in the United States since 2000, the report said, immigration significantly has outpaced record levels seen in the 1990s and has shown no sign of abating.
"Advocates of mass immigration justified the record-breaking immigration levels of the 1990s on labor-market demands during the high-tech, bubble-driven economy of that era," FAIR executive director Dan Stein said. "One would have expected that when the bubble burst, the overheated immigration would have cooled along with the economy.
"In fact, the opposite has been true," he said. "The past two years prove conclusively that immigration today is wholly unrelated to economic needs and conditions in this country."
The report, based on a study by FAIR of the U.S. Census Bureau's annual population survey for 2000 through 2002, issued in April, said an immigration base of 14 percent in 2010 nearly would double the figure posted in 1990.
FAIR is a nonprofit, public-interest organization with more than 70,000 members nationwide who support increased border enforcement to stop illegal immigration and have called for a cap on annual immigration levels of about 300,000.
In September, the U.S. Census Bureau said the foreign-born population in the United States had grown to more than 33 million in 2002, a jump of 5 percent in one year, and accounted for nearly half the country's population growth last year. The foreign-born population accounted for 44 percent of the total U.S. population growth during the year.
The FAIR report also noted that mass immigration had become a "nationwide phenomenon," meaning that it was no longer confined to a handful of states. It said North Carolina, Colorado, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and Michigan saw current rates of immigration increase by more than 100 percent during the 1990s, with North Carolina leading the way with a 355 percent increase.
New immigrants in the traditional major settlement states of New York, California, New Jersey, Florida, Texas and Illinois were running more than a quarter million immigrants higher each year than during the 1990s, the report said. It also said 19 states now receive more than double the rate of new immigrant settlements than before 2000.
"With almost every state in the country struggling to maintain vital public services and infrastructure, mass immigration is increasing the burdens on education, public health care and requiring enormous investment in new infrastructure, when local governments are hard-pressed to keep existing infrastructure funded," Mr. Stein said.
According to the report, California is projected to have more than 12 million foreign-born residents by 2010. Based on current estimates, California will have an additional 3.4 million new immigrants during this decade, as the tax-paying middle class is leaving the state for the first time in its history, the report states.
"Whatever flimsy arguments the proponents of mass immigration were able to concoct during the illusory economic boom of the late 1990s about immigration serving some national interest, they have been utterly dispelled by the reality of the post-high-tech bust," Mr. Stein said.
"Mass immigration has nothing whatsoever to do with the economic and social well-being of the United States or the American people," he said. "There is no longer even a fig leaf of national interest to cover the explicit agenda of those who promote mass immigration."
Net immigration rises by millions

By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES


Net immigration to the United States rose dramatically by 1.4 million in each of the past two years, about half a million of whom were listed as illegal aliens, a report said yesterday.
The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) said if the numbers remain unchanged, this decade will mark the most massive wave of immigration in American history, with 45 million immigrants — about 14 percent of the country's total projected population — forecast to be residing in the United States by 2010.
The extensive FAIR report also said the figures show that immigration totals are unrelated to the labor needs and economic conditions in this country. Despite a weak U.S. economy and rising unemployment in the United States since 2000, the report said, immigration significantly has outpaced record levels seen in the 1990s and has shown no sign of abating.
"Advocates of mass immigration justified the record-breaking immigration levels of the 1990s on labor-market demands during the high-tech, bubble-driven economy of that era," FAIR executive director Dan Stein said. "One would have expected that when the bubble burst, the overheated immigration would have cooled along with the economy.
"In fact, the opposite has been true," he said. "The past two years prove conclusively that immigration today is wholly unrelated to economic needs and conditions in this country."
The report, based on a study by FAIR of the U.S. Census Bureau's annual population survey for 2000 through 2002, issued in April, said an immigration base of 14 percent in 2010 nearly would double the figure posted in 1990.
FAIR is a nonprofit, public-interest organization with more than 70,000 members nationwide who support increased border enforcement to stop illegal immigration and have called for a cap on annual immigration levels of about 300,000.
In September, the U.S. Census Bureau said the foreign-born population in the United States had grown to more than 33 million in 2002, a jump of 5 percent in one year, and accounted for nearly half the country's population growth last year. The foreign-born population accounted for 44 percent of the total U.S. population growth during the year.
The FAIR report also noted that mass immigration had become a "nationwide phenomenon," meaning that it was no longer confined to a handful of states. It said North Carolina, Colorado, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and Michigan saw current rates of immigration increase by more than 100 percent during the 1990s, with North Carolina leading the way with a 355 percent increase.
New immigrants in the traditional major settlement states of New York, California, New Jersey, Florida, Texas and Illinois were running more than a quarter million immigrants higher each year than during the 1990s, the report said. It also said 19 states now receive more than double the rate of new immigrant settlements than before 2000.
"With almost every state in the country struggling to maintain vital public services and infrastructure, mass immigration is increasing the burdens on education, public health care and requiring enormous investment in new infrastructure, when local governments are hard-pressed to keep existing infrastructure funded," Mr. Stein said.
According to the report, California is projected to have more than 12 million foreign-born residents by 2010. Based on current estimates, California will have an additional 3.4 million new immigrants during this decade, as the tax-paying middle class is leaving the state for the first time in its history, the report states.
"Whatever flimsy arguments the proponents of mass immigration were able to concoct during the illusory economic boom of the late 1990s about immigration serving some national interest, they have been utterly dispelled by the reality of the post-high-tech bust," Mr. Stein said.
"Mass immigration has nothing whatsoever to do with the economic and social well-being of the United States or the American people," he said. "There is no longer even a fig leaf of national interest to cover the explicit agenda of those who promote mass immigration."
washtimes.com