SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VPHM - Viropharma Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (1715)11/29/2003 3:06:24 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Respond to of 2557
 
Let's be simple. This is not a complex issue.

Naked shorting is counterfeiting. You sell shares that you do not own and have not borrowed. Naked shorts have a vested interest in declaring a company as "scam", as much as finding those which actually are such. And they WANT the company to fight back, to maintain share price. The more buyers, the better..... a printing press for money. In the post-9/11 world, the naked short whores declared every microcap with debt a scam. As recently as last December, the companies were doomed.

Tom has constantly returned to the crucial question, for listed stocks. If I'm correct and the float of VPHM has been artificially expanded (by many, many millions of shares) as has been done for bulletin board stocks, how do the shares get registered for the buyer?

That's when I feel stupid, stopped cold in my whining tracks without a logical answer. But, I have very, very bad short-term memory, and I forget the feeling.

;-)



To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (1715)11/29/2003 3:09:23 PM
From: The Dodgy Ticker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2557
 
Well, I sure hope that the SEC's proposed rule of October 29 gets passed or ratified (I have no idea who has to approve it). Somebody on the Yahoo Elan board opined that naked shorting is already illegal, so what more is needed?

Bob