SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (500551)11/29/2003 3:47:08 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 769667
 
"a $500 budget deficit is nothing."

>>> LOL! Really?

>>> First: Bush DOUBLES the rate of discressionary spending that existed under Clinton. <More Big Government for everyone>.

>>> Next, he reduces some marginal tax rates (good), but fails to reduce or eliminate ANY of the tax loopholes or 'special tax preference items'... in fact, he INCREASES subsidies and tariffs, while doing NOTHING to reform our corrupt and unbalanced tax system.

>>> Now, we've got massive deficits for the foreseeable future --- and even the President's own hand-picked private economics forecasting firm sees no return to prudence or balance. Their conclusion (which agrees in the main with the OMB study) said that the GOOD achieved by ALL of his tax cuts would be obliterated within the decade by the extra spending and the rise of interest costs on the debt.

>>> Pardon me... but I fail to see anything particularly useful that he has achieved for our economy.



To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (500551)11/29/2003 4:52:38 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Projected Bush new deficits 13 TRILLION by 2010 if his tax programs and spending remain the same.



To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (500551)11/29/2003 4:53:42 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Like Bushies dumping nuke waste in our landfills?
That's what they're trying to do. The Environmental president he called himself in 2000.



To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (500551)11/29/2003 8:41:01 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
JP, you can disagree with the records of the US Treasury if you wish but nobody else believes you.