Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jpthoma1 who wrote (24730)	11/29/2003 8:13:09 PM
From: Frankly Speaking	Respond to of 39344

JP, Thanks for the detailed info. I've been watching this one for a while, and I think that under $2.00 might be a good entry point. Cheers F.S.

To: jpthoma1 who wrote (24730)	12/6/2003 1:28:52 AM
From: aknahow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

I have to ask, which will reveal my lack of knowledge, but I want to know if what surprised you was considered good or bad. "Whereas preliminary fieldwork led to the interpretation that the mineralized ultramafic rocks were channelized flows belonging to the Povungnituk Group, extensive mapping in 2003 has shown that they are sharply discordant magmatic conduits in all cases. Mineral fabrics, metamorphic grades, detailed drill sections and map patterns show that the entire South Raglan trend can be interpreted as a series of en echelon or parallel dikes trending approximately N70E, which can collectively be termed the Expo Dikes. The Expo Dikes were emplaced into the New Quebec Orogen after the development of km-scale open folds in the metasedimentary and metavolcanic supracrustal succession "Although the overall similarity of the mineralization in the Expo Dikes invites correlation with the Raglan trend, the grossly different Cu/Ni ratios (1.0 in the Expo Dikes, 0.3 at Raglan) suggest that the two suites are unrelated. The timing of emplacement of the Expo Dikes is problematic and may require re-evaluation of the tectonic evolution of the New Quebec Orogen. " Thanks. I assume it is a positive or the company would not have gone into such detail.