Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (500875)	11/30/2003 8:07:07 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Respond to of 769667

Hillary probably will cost another 300 lives unneccessarily. Now, how do you know something like that? Isn't that just crazy speculation? Isn't it more likely that Bush's decision to hand over the government by July 1 has made Bremer a lame duck and created an atmosphere where nobody will cooperate hoping to better their position after July 1?

To: JDN who wrote (500875)	11/30/2003 12:02:20 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Respond to of 769667

LOL! Blame Hillary for the next 300 deaths in Iraq? ROTFLMAO You wingers would be lost without a Clinton to blame your woes on. Orca

To: JDN who wrote (500875)	11/30/2003 12:56:06 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 769667

Hillary was quite courageous going to Baghdad and Afghanistan. She was, I presume, there to represent the Democratic party and half our country not just herself. Her statements were very necessary as we ae in danger of losing the peace in both countries under current Bushie policies. Her message was a lot more realistic than Bush's. He basically just gave a cheerleading talk with the old "Bring em on!" spirit. Bush was a cheerleader in college so it seems he's quite good at this. I hope it helped. But as soon as he left, the casualties continued unabated.

To: JDN who wrote (500875)	11/30/2003 4:55:01 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 769667

The Senate Committee on Armed Services web site must be jammed right now...I can't get in, or I'd send the link. My guess is that I'm not the only one wondering why just two Democrats on this committee are the only ones who went to Iraq. If it was a publicly paid for (taxpayers) event, she won't be able to use any footage for political gain. I certainly agree...all committee members in the House and Senate can go to the areas of the world that pertain to their areas of work, (within the bounds of the body of rules governing these visits by Committee members)....BUT going over and speaking to the world through the media, as if she was in charge of MAKING policy, is over the top, even for Hillary. BTW, Did anyone notice Bill was AOL from the event as well?