Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Quincy who wrote (12687)	11/30/2003 2:40:40 PM
From: P2V	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

Sorry Old Quincy , There seems no way I can help you overcome your 5.x ghz phobea. (1) Regarding .... But, you are claiming most, if not all of the multipath energy will be reflected, as opposed to absorbed, all the way to the receiver. That doesn't sounds more like a fixed pringles can than an omnidirectional antenna. That statement , IMHO, is pretty confusing. And shows that you don't have much of a clue about the antenna arrays used and understand nothing of what I have discussed. re: Why do OFDM-based standards such as 802.11a at the same 5ghz MMDS frequencies struggle to cover 200 ft? LOL , maybe it is because 11a was designed as an indoor replacement for 100Base T Local Area Networks, eh ? However, if you care to expose yourself to reality, you could always do some DD on W-OFDM products by Wi-Lan, and even Alvarion's VL products. With that , I end this use less exercise, for now anyway :-) OM