SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan B. who wrote (500982)11/30/2003 2:31:49 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
IMPEACH BUSH....now look at the drunken power of the republicans.....it's a horror of fiscal responsibility....
GOP Puts Its Mark on Congress and Deficit
By Janet Hook, Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — A full year of Republican dominance of government has
left a legacy rich in conservative triumphs: cutting taxes, building a muscular
defense, restricting abortion.

But the year has also brought an extraordinary expansion of government
power and spending that showed Republicans were willing to deep-six their
party's traditional commitment to fiscal conservatism and limited government.

The
Republican-controlled
Congress has passed the
third tax cut in as many
years, an enormous
Pentagon budget, a
costly experiment in
nation-building in Iraq
and a vast expansion of
Medicare — all at the
request of President
Bush. Their actions have
left the federal budget
swimming in the largest
deficits in history.

As one lawmaker heard from a Republican friend, "Democrats are the party
of 'tax and spend'; Republicans are the party of 'don't tax — and spend.' "
That is the ironic product of the first full year since 1954 that Republicans have
controlled the White House and Congress.

Although the ideological message is mixed, Republicans have engineered significant changes in U.S.
foreign, domestic and fiscal policy. The magnitude of change is surprising in light of the wafer-thin
margins by which Bush was elected in 2000 and by which the GOP controls the House and Senate.
Republicans have managed to do so in part by using extraordinary means to maintain party discipline
— and by being willing to spend taxpayer dollars freely to build their legislative coalitions.


"It shows what you can accomplish if you don't care about deficits," said Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.).
"That's going to be the most lasting legacy of this Congress."

Congress is expected to reconvene briefly in early December to tie up loose ends and possibly pass a
catch-all spending bill to finish the budget, but most of this year's legislative record has already been
written.

When 2003 began, just how decisively Republicans would be able to reshape policy was an open
question. It was clear that the House would continue to be a bastion of conservatism, especially as
partisan firebrand Tom DeLay (R-Texas) ascended to House majority leader, the chamber's
second-most-powerful post. Less certain was what could be accomplished in the Senate, where
Republicans held 51 of the chamber's 100 seats and had a new majority leader, Bill Frist (R-Tenn.),
who was considered less ideological than DeLay.

But on a variety of fronts, this Congress broke ground and steered policy in directions that would have
been unthinkable under the Democrats.

To the delight of anti-tax conservatives, Congress by midyear had passed a $350-billion tax cut to
stimulate the economy. That amount was less than Bush had sought, but much more than many thought
possible at a time of growing deficits.

On social issues, Congress approved the first abortion restrictions in 30 years in a bill, signed by Bush,
that banned a late-term procedure that doctors call "intact dilation and extraction" and opponents call
"partial-birth abortion."

On the international front, Republicans rallied behind and financed Bush's doctrine of preemptive
military action. Congress financed the war in Iraq and, despite reservations, put up almost $20 billion
for rebuilding Iraq, the most ambitious foreign aid initiative since the Marshall Plan. The pro-business
agenda thrived, as Congress cleared the way for Bush to limit overtime pay, relax certain clean-air
requirements and increase logging in national forests. Congress almost passed — and may do so early
next year — a bill bristling with tax breaks and subsidies for oil, gas and other energy industries
.

Even in expanding the Medicare program, conservatives in Congress broke ground: The bill providing
new prescription drug benefits also called for an unprecedented level of involvement by private health
plans, a long-held and long-frustrated goal of free-market conservatives.

Many such major bills have passed by the narrowest of margins, with the help of heavy arm-twisting by
Bush and Republican leaders who have tried to enforce strict party discipline.

In a display of political muscle, House Republican leaders kept the vote on Medicare open for almost
three hours in order to win. Final versions of the energy bill and other major measures were negotiated
with almost no Democratic input. Democrats were given little time to review such bills before they were
brought to a vote: When Democrats protested at one committee meeting, the chairman called the police
to break up the private strategy meeting.

Republicans said they had to rely on such tactics because Democrats had shown little interest in
bipartisan cooperation. Democrats argue that the Republicans' hardball tactics were previewed during
the 2000 Florida recount that gave Bush the presidency and the negative ads they ran in the 2002
Senate elections.

"There were plenty of indications that they were going to use brass knuckles — that they were going to
bend the rules and use any means necessary to win," said Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle
(D-S.D.).

Republicans may have paid a price when the Senate voted Nov. 21 to block the energy bill. That vote
reflected, in part, the resentment of Democrats who were cut out of the process of writing the final bill.

It also reflected some Republicans' frustration with their leaders' willingness to throw money at
legislative problems. In an effort to stitch together a winning coalition, authors of the energy bill included
$25.7 billion worth of tax breaks for special interests — about three times the amount Bush wanted.

Similar concerns dogged the Medicare bill, which came under attack from conservatives who thought it
cost too much and would grow much larger in the future. But Republican leaders built a powerful
coalition behind the bill in part by diverting billions from the drug benefit to subsidies for private health
plans, increased reimbursements for doctors (who were supposed to see a cut in payments) and
increased funding for rural health-care providers.


"I'm concerned there has been an atmosphere on the Hill that the way we get bills passed is simply to
load them with spending," said Robert S. Walker, a lobbyist who was a member of the House
Republican leadership before he left Congress in 1997.

The nearly $400-billion Medicare bill was an emblematic conclusion to a year in which Republicans
seemed willing to throw fiscal caution to the wind, putting the deficit on track to hit $500 billion in
2004.

Republican leaders offered no apology for the Medicare bill's price tag, saying it included some
market-oriented reforms that could, in the long run, help control costs. And they have argued all year
that controlling the deficit should take a back seat to other priorities at a time when the United States is
embroiled in the conflict in Iraq and the economy is struggling to recover.

But other Republicans are concerned that war and recession have become an excuse for spending on
programs that have nothing to do with national security or stimulating the economy.

"Republicans used to believe in fiscal responsibility, limited international entanglements and limited
government," said Sen. Charles Hagel (R-Neb.) in a commentary published Wednesday in the Omaha
World-Herald. "We have come loose from our moorings. The Medicare reform bill is a good example
of our lack of direction, purpose and responsibility."

Rep. John B. Shadegg (R-Ariz.), a conservative leader, said this year's record shows how much the
experience of running the government has eroded Republican commitment to limiting government. "It
appears that Republicans have discovered the perks of power," Shadegg said, "and the most powerful
of those is spending."



To: Dan B. who wrote (500982)11/30/2003 2:33:24 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Bush's hands are red with others blood....
7 Allied Officers Killed in Iraq
The Spanish intelligence agents are ambushed south of Baghdad. Two U.S. soldiers and
two Japanese diplomats are slain elsewhere.

By John Daniszewski and Patrick J. McDonnell, Times Staff
Writers

LATIFIYAH, Iraq — Fighters with automatic rifles and
rocket-propelled grenades overwhelmed two cars of
armed Spanish intelligence officers on a heavily traveled
highway here Saturday, killing seven of the eight agents
aboard in a brief but fierce battle.

Iraqi insurgents also killed two American soldiers and
two Japanese diplomats in separate ambushes
Saturday.

The attack raised to 111 the coalition's combat death
toll for November, the costliest month for the U.S. and
its allies since the invasion of Iraq more than eight
months ago. As the Spaniards' bodies lay beside their
burning cars, a few joyful Iraqis surged toward them, in
some cases kicking or stepping on the corpses and
chanting pro-Saddam Hussein slogans. One of the
Spaniards was injured but survived the attack.

"These were holy warriors making jihad [holy war]
against the invaders," said Abdul Qader Faisal, a
26-year-old student among the Iraqis celebrating at the
scene. "We don't want the Americans here. We don't
want the Spanish here. The Americans have done
nothing for us."

Video footage from the scene, broadcast throughout
the Arab world, showed rejoicing youths dancing
alongside the burned remains of the four-wheel-drive
vehicles. Many of the celebrants brandished parts of the
vehicles.

Witnesses said the Spanish agents were ambushed by
men armed with machine guns in two cars. The
Spaniards' vehicles veered off the road. Some agents
may have returned fire, said residents of the rural area,
about 20 miles south of Baghdad. Some witnesses said
gunmen from nearby buildings also opened fire,
suggesting that the assault was well coordinated.

An early U.S. ally in the war to remove Hussein, Spain has sent 1,300 troops to
support the occupation, participating in an international division based in Hillah,
south of Baghdad, and responsible for a sector of central Iraq. Ten Spaniards
have been killed since the war began.

A statement issued by the coalition today said two U.S. soldiers were killed when
a convoy of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment was ambushed near Husaybah, a
town near the Syrian border. A third soldier, who was wounded in the attack,
was flown by helicopter to a nearby base hospital.

Separately, two Japanese diplomats were killed Saturday after their car was
ambushed in northern Iraq, Japan's Foreign Ministry said.

Details of the attack were still sketchy, but Foreign Minister Yoriko Kawaguchi
said in Tokyo that the vehicle was ambushed near the city of Tikrit, where the
envoys were to attend an aid conference.

Katsuhiko Oku, 45, headed the cultural affairs section of the Japanese Embassy
in London and had been on assignment in Iraq. Masamori Inoue, 30, was a
mid-level diplomat at the Baghdad mission.

Their driver, whose nationality was not immediately known, was seriously injured.

The killing of the two embassy officials is likely to disquiet Japan, which has been
debating when to dispatch its troops to aid in Iraq's reconstruction. The Japanese
public remains wary of sending its troops to Iraq, and Prime Minister Junichiro
Koizumi has declined to say exactly when the troops will be sent, saying only that
he will send them after carefully studying the situation.

U.S. Secretary of State Colin L. Powell telephoned Kawaguchi to express his
sympathy, the Foreign Ministry said. Kawaguchi told him that Japan would not
waver in its commitment to the campaign against terrorism and the reconstruction
of Iraq.

The Bush administration has been trying to expand its coalition to relieve the
burden on U.S. forces. So far, it has not been able to enlist significant numbers of
foreign troops. This month, 19 Italians, including two civilians, were killed in a
bombing in the southern city of Nasiriyah, Italy's highest military death toll since
World War II.

Latifiyah, a Sunni Muslim stronghold on the edge of the so-called Sunni Triangle,
has been the scene of several bloody incidents in recent weeks and witnessed the
assassination of its pro-U.S. police chief a week ago.

A spokesman reached at the Spanish Defense Ministry in Madrid said those
killed belonged to the National Intelligence Service and were traveling from
Baghdad to the headquarters in Hillah. Four of the officers were scheduled to
relieve the other four, and they were preparing to change posts. "They were
attacked by RPG rockets and Kalashnikovs," said the spokesman, who would
not give his name.

U.S. officials had noted a sharp drop-off in attacks against coalition forces in
recent days, saying it was the result of a more aggressive policy by the coalition
military. But another possible explanation is that insurgents were following
religious leaders' exhortations to slow attacks during the Eid al-Fitr holiday at the
end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. Eid al-Fitr ended Thursday.

Asked about the high level of casualties in November, a spokesman for the U.S.
Central Command in Florida said that many of the losses came in a few unusually
deadly attacks.

"There were a couple of incidents that involved a large number of soldiers, such
as the helicopter crashes, that inflated the numbers," said Cmdr. Dan Gage, a
Central Command spokesman.

In recent weeks, hostile fire is believed to have been involved in the crashes of
five U.S. military helicopters, killing 39 Americans.

A Pentagon spokeswoman said that as of 4 p.m. Friday, 298 U.S. soldiers had
been killed in hostile fire in Iraq and 137 had died in nonhostile circumstances
since the beginning of the war in March.

The top U.S. military commander in the country, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, said
at a news conference in Baghdad on Saturday that although officials believed that
the Al Qaeda terrorist network was linked to the ongoing attacks in Iraq, they
had yet to identify any Al Qaeda fighters in the country.

But Sanchez said there were continuing indications that foreign recruits might have
played a part in the string of suicide bombings that have killed dozens in Iraq and
terrorized a nation already traumatized by war. One assailant captured in a foiled
attack on a Baghdad police station last month has been identified as a Yemeni.

"There could have been some operatives that blew themselves up," said Sanchez,
who noted similarities between the suicide attack on the Italian compound in
southern Iraq and suicide car bombings in Saudi Arabia blamed on Al Qaeda.
"When you look at the transfer of tactics and techniques, there's some indicators
that maybe they're learning from each other."

The role of foreign fighters in the turmoil has been a contentious question in Iraq
for months.

Bush administration officials have tended to emphasize the involvement of foreign
volunteers. But U.S. military commanders have generally downplayed the
foreigners' significance.

The Army says hard-line Iraqi loyalists of the former regime have financed and
organized the attacks, although military officials acknowledge that the loyalists
may have used the services of foreign-trained assailants in the suicide attacks.

On Friday, Italian and German police arrested three suspected members of a
European-based network that had allegedly recruited Islamic extremists in
Europe to fight in Iraq.

Italian officials said five such recruits had died in suicide attacks in Iraq in recent
months, although the U.S. military in Iraq could not confirm the Italian account.

Even before the U.S. invasion, the Hussein government had paraded legions of
foreign volunteers before the international media, identifying them as recruits
willing to give their lives in the fight against the U.S. Some were killed in the
fighting during the U.S. march to Baghdad, officials say. But some are believed to
have escaped and may have linked up with former government elements, officials
say.

Sanchez reiterated the military's belief that Hussein loyalists represented the "key
threat" facing the U.S.-led coalition now running Iraq.

Officials have raised the possibility that Hussein hard-liners might have formed an
alliance with foreign suicide bombing recruits and might be using them to drive
vehicles to targets selected and scouted by Iraqis.

As the military clashes continued, politicians on the Iraqi Governing Council
working with the United States came closer to demanding that the Coalition
Provisional Authority allow direct elections to choose the full transitional
government that is scheduled to take over in June.

That would be a reversal of the policy agreed to less than two weeks ago by the
coalition and the Governing Council in which regional caucuses would be held to
select representatives to the new government.

Since then, Shiite Muslim leaders have become uneasy about the possibility that
they might lose out unless there were direct elections. With the backing of the
highly respected Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, they have begun to push hard to
revisit the agreement.

After some lobbying, a majority of the Governing Council now supports direct
elections, several members said.

U.S. officials have argued repeatedly that Iraq was not stable enough for such a
popular vote.

*



To: Dan B. who wrote (500982)12/1/2003 12:12:40 AM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
We have testimony indicating Iraq may be involved

There are opinions that Iraq may be involved but no evidence. Those expressing the opinions have a financial interest in the occupation of Iraq. There is incentive for any supporting facts to be reported yet none have been. It is certain that Iraq was not involved in 9/11.

TP