Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Mining Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (3876)	12/1/2003 7:53:02 PM
From: ralfph	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4051

Dead wrong Michael. If you take in the migration patterns of many species. The area other species need to live in with no human pressure. Factor in noise pollution , air pollution , energy consumption, agricultural land , heat sinks, ecological reserves land, ecological reserves water and about 100 other related issues- many human health based the maximum sustainable population comes out at about 2 billion. But you have all the answers already do you not ? The last time I spoke at a conference that discussed these issues I got to listen to a nice RC gentleman who was certain that the world should hold 23 billion or more. To be honest I have better things to do with my time than discuss this stuff. You will not change . This is a investing thread. Go start a " My God is the best God " thread or something. If there is a God he should be sued for incompetence. ralfph