Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (501550)	12/1/2003 2:56:55 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 769667

My insistence is based on the facts That ought to be on the joke thread coming from you, Toilet Paper... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Your insistence is based upon Bush hating moronism.....no more...no less..... This morning you were spouting the nonsense that GWB is a puppet....now you say he has "local yes men"...... Try to keep your delusions in better order...... What a freakin' moron you are.....you are an embarrassment to people with real and legitimate concerns about government.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (501550)	12/1/2003 3:33:41 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

"At least one major section of that draft, the part dealing with terrorist organizations and their relationship to Saddam, ... Saddam and his regime ARE a terrorist organization.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (501550)	12/1/2003 8:37:17 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

First off, you won't find "Junior's loyal yes men" saying anyone knows there was "no connection between Saddam and 9/11," let alone themsleves. So your first sentence is untrue. Your insistence, per above, is upon a false statement. Your opinion is all you are left with, and, per above, it cannot correctly be claimed as some incontrovertible fact all should recognize, for no one knows that Saddam had no connection even to 911 itself. Information to date exists which indicates Al Qaeda was indeed conversing with Saddam's Iraq, even that the Saudis who boarded planes on 911 likely trained on the 707 at the training camp in Iraq. There is no evidence to show this information is false, while there is testimony and photography to indicate it's true. Given who Saddam is, there's little reason to doubt it. Re: "you seem to grasp at the straw that perhaps everyone in the world is covering up a connection or something." Hardly grasping at straws, the reasonable suspicion is merely that Saddam(not "everyong in the world") was actively hiding all he could for some time even prior to our action in Iraq. More significantly, this remains a moot issue given that we know Saddam has supported terrorists, has supported the actions of Al Qaeda with his praise, has plain terrorist intent, and so rightly became a major part of a much needed and appropriate defensive response in this War on Terror. We all heard the Colin Powell speech, and the man would seem to believe Saddam supported terrorist activities and was a threat. He has legitimate reason to believe, IMO. The little theory you reference in support of your opinion is therefore just as at odds with reality as was your opening sentence. Dan B.