SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (79330)12/1/2003 6:50:33 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Most of us consider "rights" as natural or legal. Natural rights are as given by Jefferson, et al. Rights require a possessor. "I have a right" or "IT has a right" assumes a conscious being whom may be entitled to a certain form of treatment. If something is incapable of judging value it is ludicrous to refer to "right". A rock does not care whether you pour milk on it or pee on it...

You might as well say my sperm has a right to whatever. It has more of a right than a walnut, I suppose. But it is nonsensical to speak of right where there is no interest. Point me to one thinker in human existence since the beginning of time who espouses such a strange belief? Erasmus, Voltaire, Socrates, Marx, Diderot??