Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: calgal who wrote (501916)	12/2/2003 1:17:13 AM
From: calgal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Noble Aspirations We Iranians seek fundamental change. By Koorosh Afshar TEHRAN, IRAN — Most Westerners know very little, if anything, about the true psyche of the Iranian masses. Allow me to enlighten: For centuries, it has been dominated by fruitless anticipation and superstition. The people of my nation have been told to await a messiah who will finally deliver them; they faithfully cling to the idea that one great leader will relieve their suffering. Twenty-five years ago, the enemies of my nation took advantage of this embarrassing fantasy, setting the stage for the Islamic revolution. Since then, Iran has languished for more than two decades, and was doomed to fall for another mendacious and sinister mullah, Khatami, six years ago. As time passed, the Iranian citizenry realized that this mullah, like the others, was nothing more than a mediocre Islamist politician, and certainly not the long-awaited messiah. In fact, our national messiah never came. He never will. But at least we've wizened up. Instead of superstition, the majority of the new generation of Iranians diligently embraces the concept of self-determination. It was, then, good news for us when one of our compatriots (a woman, no less), Shirin Ebadi, won the Nobel peace prize earlier this year. We sincerely hope that this will help secularize our thinking and bring about meaningful change. It will have to: There is no other path for the future of our nation. So long as the militant Islamists are in power, talk of reform is futile. The first and foremost task for a person like Ebadi is to help represent the Iranian nationalist mindset and identity to the world. The mullahs, however, are not making her job any easier: They criticize on religious grounds, condemning Ebadi's unorthodox views. But in her capacity as an Iranian ambassador to the world, her religion (whether compatible or at odds with the mullahs') is quite irrelevant. Religion is merely a private matter, and it must not and will not have any place in the future political system of Iran. This is essential. Historians know full well that whenever a state is controlled by particular religious institution, human-rights violations follow in short order. There can be no talk of individualism while, at the same time, the state imposes on everyone a specific spiritual ideology. The inevitable result of such a system is strict categorization: Citizens are branded either as insiders or outsiders, believers or infidels. Those peers of mine who poured into the streets of Tehran, left with nothing but clenched fists and slogans, had completely given up on "reforming" this flawed system. They do not aspire to bring about a milder version of the current regime, and neither do I: We seek more fundamental change. Now Mrs. Ebadi is at a very critical juncture. She can, with her wise secular words, shatter the suffocating bonds of theocracy, and represent to the world the desires of the Iranian nation. As she faces obstacles in doing so, she should be bolstered by the fact that nothing is nobler than the just, secular aspirations of my nation — or the act of supporting them. She should remember the words of Thomas Paine: "Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny in religion is the worst; every other species of tyranny is limited to the world we live in; but this attempts to stride beyond the grave, and seeks to pursue us into eternity." As we pursue reform, accomplishing religious freedom would be nice. But our priority should be casting aside old superstitions, and replacing them with a much more powerful, fundamental faith: the religion of freedom. — Koorosh Afshar is a pseudonym for a student in Tehran. His name has been changed for his protection. He has previously written for NRO here and here.

To: calgal who wrote (501916)	12/2/2003 1:21:58 AM
From: calgal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Gephardt Wants Increased Security Funds Monday, December 01, 2003 CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa — Democratic presidential candidate Dick Gephardt (search), faulting President Bush for "gambling with our safety," on Monday called for spending $100 billion over five years on homeland security (search). Battling front-runner Howard Dean (search) for a critical win in the Jan. 19 caucus state, the Missouri congressman proposed the creation of a Homeland Security Trust Fund (search) to assist state and local communities. The plan would be financed by eliminating special interest tax breaks. "A guiding principle of homeland security is that it should look both inward and outward. A foreign policy that drives away natural allies in the war against terrorism does our country no good. And shortchanging domestic security puts our citizens here at home at undue risk," Gephardt said. "Homeland security involves balance and common sense. Unfortunately, those are two qualities we rarely see in this White House." Speaking at police headquarters in this eastern Iowa city, Gephardt said he would spend $20 billion per year over the next five years. A special commission, modeled after the independent military base closing commission, would sort through the federal tax code and identify unneeded subsidies. "When you measure progress on the threats that could inflict the greatest number of casualties, it's clear this president is gambling with our safety," Gephardt said. He pointed to a study by the U.S. Conference of Mayors (search) estimating that cities have spent more than $2.6 billion on homeland security costs such as police equipment, fire department upgrades and emergency health preparedness. Those cities spend $70 million every week the nation is on a heightened alert status, "an unbearable burden for state and local governments," he said. "As a result of George Bush's abdication of duty, governors, state legislators and mayors of both parties are being forced to cut not only education and health care, but also homeland security," Gephardt said. The former House minority leader, who worked closely with the administration in drawing up the congressional resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq, said Bush has turned the congressional mandate on its ear and left the nation less secure. foxnews.com