SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (502287)12/2/2003 4:03:55 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Re: "Saddam always fought in a conventional manner with a conventional army."

No, he used unconventional chemical weapons multiple times on his own people, and he tried to carry out an assassination upon our President WAY back. So if he's inflexible, I'm sure he has a history replete with the use of enough varying means to his ends, to justify our action.

You'll have to demonstrate "nothingness" to a high degree of certainty to justly declare that "There is no terror campaign, no weapons...." You aren't going to find nothingness, you are going to find that Saddam threatened us, and you'll be told he has used a wide range of methods to seek his ends in the past.

You believe Bush terrorizes the people of Iraq? Funny, they rather like it(not Saddams "buddies", of course).

Dan B.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (502287)12/2/2003 4:06:44 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Nah, Saddam's Iraq did attempt some terrorist actions (re: Indonesia, etc.)... it's just that they were REALLY incompetent at it.

Come to think of it --- the US has some history in that regard, too (Contras anyone?)



To: TigerPaw who wrote (502287)12/2/2003 4:27:59 PM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
re: Saddam always fought in a conventional manner with a conventional army.

with a conventional chemical weapons, eh? <gggggg>

re: It is Junior who must prove the link to terror

Saddam was very open in his support of terrorism. If you do not know that then you are simply ignorant and should not post your moronic views to intelligent people <gggg>



To: TigerPaw who wrote (502287)12/2/2003 6:05:02 PM
From: Rick McDougall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
< It is Junior who must prove the link to terror before he terrorises the people of Iraq.>........its happening right now TP.....the terrorism of the Iraqis that is.