Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (502529)	12/2/2003 10:40:32 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Yes all the vacant liberal minded lefty loons cannot refute Rush. Only lie about him and make personal attacks. samo samo lame identification event cue. Memo Reveals Iraq's Links To Al-Qaeda November 17, 2003 The Weekly Standard's Stephen F. Hayes: "Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein had an operational relationship from the early 1990s to 2003 that involved training in explosives and weapons of mass destruction, logistical support for terrorist attacks, Al-Qaeda training camps and safe haven in Iraq, and Iraqi financial support for Al-Qaeda - perhaps even for Mohamed Atta - according to a top secret U.S. government memorandum..." I never understood why this was so hard for Democrats and liberals to believe, when Osama and Saddam shared a deep hatred of us. All that talk of Saddam being "secular" and Osama being "religious" is absurd. Osama isn't "religious," he just uses religion - and Saddam was naming mosques after himself and putting the name of Allah on the Iraqi flag to look religious too. Besides, Osama (or whoever's making those tapes) urged Al-Qaeda to fight alongside the "socialist infidel" Hussein on the eve of Gulf War Two! This sixteen page memo "covers only a fraction of the evidence that will eventually be available to document the Iraq-Al-Qaeda relationship." We already knew about the Salman Pak terrorist training facility in Iraq, folks. Yes, the Department of Defense did release a statement calling these news stories "inaccurate," but they don't deny the connection at all. In a Washington Times editorial, they report the meeting of bin Laden and the top Iraqi intelligence technical expert on making sophisticated explosives. The memo also states that two Iraqi intel officers "were part of a delegation which met with bin Laden in Afghanistan from 1999 to 2003." We're in a rather precarious moment in this war, folks, in this effort to rebuild Iraq and end the idea that Muslim nations are somehow happy living without human freedom. We're near the "Mogadishu moment," and the worst thing we can do is cut and run. I don't understand that attitude, especially since the same Democrats who demand we pull out of Iraq will scream the loudest if we do so tomorrow. After all, they screamed that Bush 41 didn't "finish the job" in 1991 and now they scream that Bush 43 finished the job in 2003! We're going to work really fast now to turn over governance of Iraq to the Iraqis, because this is part of the war on terrorism, which began against us on 9/11. "Well, yeah, easy for you to say! You're not there in the line of fire." Were those people in the Twin Towers and Pentagon or on those four hijacked jets "in the line of fire"? This is a different kind of war, folks. That doesn't mean we don't revere and thank those who volunteer to go fight our enemies in the streets of foreign lands to keep them off our streets at home - but the key is, we must fight them and not think we can run and hide. There is no where safe in this war; we have no choice but to fight. rushlimbaugh.com

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (502529)	12/2/2003 11:10:43 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 769667

THE GALLING HYPOCRISY OF TOM DELAY -- When DeLay's hopes of an elitist brush off to New York was brought to the light of day, this cockroach in a suit employed his propaganda chief to start spinning the whoppers: "Tom DeLay fights for what he believes in, but where we have an event at the convention is not something that he particularly cares about.... He will stand and fight on principle for things he believes in, like Medicare, things that matter. Whether you have an event on a boat is irrelevant... A lot of disingenuous people made a mountain out of a molehill, and DeLay just decided to let the moles win." ROTFLMAO!! With material like this, the Democrats don't even need to hire a satirist. Tom Delay, Master of the House, Master Baiter, Self-basting Satirist! A real Republican Hero! nytimes.com