Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (502649)	12/3/2003 2:24:37 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

More info on Salman Pak: His authoritative testimony, backed by satellite photos showing a Russian-built Tupolev 54 airliner parked in the middle of an open field, offered key support for lawyer James Beasley's argument that Salman Pak played a role in the attacks. Beasley told the Inquirer that persuading the court about the link was "a hell of a hurdle to get over." One significant obstacle faced by the Philadelphia lawyer was that Woolsey's successor at the CIA, George Tenet, has never included Salman Pak among evidence tying Iraq to al-Qaeda - and has publicly denied that Baghdad played any role whatsoever in the 9/11 attacks. Tenet's decision to ignore the critical role played by the camp is said to be based in part on friction between the CIA and the Iraqi National Congress, which helped several Salman Pak veterans defect to the U.S. and made them available to the media. Tenet's opposition is believed to have been key in the decision by the Bush administration not to spotlight Iraq's 9/11 role, leaving White House officials with the sole argument that Saddam Hussein threatened the U.S. with weapons of mass destruction. But as the postwar search for WMDs enters its fourth week without any major find, some now fear that the Bush administration's decision to side with Tenet over Woolsey on Salman Pak is shaping up as a major political blunder. floydreport.com Orca

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (502649)	12/3/2003 4:44:47 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Talk about a predisposition! Cut him off. You are wasting you time talking to this stubborn jackass. He has not grown, learned or changed in the last 18 months I've been reading him. He has never accepted the truth or reality. He's the walking definition of an insane man. OSTRACIZE HIM! Don't give him the satisfaction of wasting your time. We will all be wiser to use this thread to present new information that we are researching on the Internet and keep the intelligent members of this thread on top of the issues. Let me repeat. You are wasting you time communicating with DanB. He and his buddies are cackling in PMs and on their RWE threads about how they tie you up in knots and jerk your chain. Don't give them the satisfaction. OSTRACIZE HIM! Put him on ignore. He's pathologically incapable of learning. He's a sociopath who lies with every post, knowingly, willfully and for an evil purpose. OSTRACIZE HIM!

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (502649)	12/3/2003 7:04:51 AM
From: Selectric II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Mr. Wilson, who was hand picked to go to Africa to check out the story, and who's wife was a CIA operative in the WMD area. Mr. Wilson, a non-expert, anti-Bush political hack who was hand picked by his wife's co-workers to see whether she and they had been doing their jobs? THERE'S the scandal.

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (502649)	12/24/2003 5:50:23 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I'm surprised that you put more weight in a Iraqi defector than you do Mr. Wilson, who was hand picked to go to Africa to check out the story, and who's wife was a CIA operative in the WMD area. And I'm surprised that you put more weight on one sole man with an anti-bush agenda, over the combined resources of MI-6.. Because y'see.. as of this date, I've seen nothing from British intelligence indicating they have rescinded their opinion about the Niger issue... And it was THEIR intelligence upon which Bush based his comments related to Niger.. And I'm sure it was QUITE "CONTROVERSIAL" within the US intelligence community that Bush would feel more confident in MI-6's intelligence on Iraq over our own.. Can you say "p*ssing contest"?? Hawk