SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tsigprofit who wrote (4838)12/4/2003 4:22:23 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20773
 
Gosh. This is just so sad:

"White House officials do not deny that they craft elaborate events to showcase Bush, but they maintain that these events are designed to accurately dramatize his policies and to convey qualities about him that are real."

So they give us fake images to show us "real" qualities that we can't see with "real" images. Drama as "news". Oh yeah. Satirists would have a hard time writing stuff as good as this.

The Bird Was Perfect But Not For Dinner
In Iraq Picture, Bush Is Holding the Centerpiece
By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 4, 2003; Page A33

President Bush's Baghdad turkey was for looking, not for eating.




In the most widely published image from his Thanksgiving day trip to Baghdad, the beaming president is wearing an Army workout jacket and surrounded by soldiers as he cradles a huge platter laden with a golden-brown turkey.

The bird is so perfect it looks as if it came from a food magazine, with bunches of grapes and other trimmings completing a Norman Rockwell image that evokes bounty and security in one of the most dangerous parts of the world.

But as a small sign of the many ways the White House maximized the impact of the 21/2-hour stop at the Baghdad airport, administration officials said yesterday that Bush picked up a decoration, not a serving plate.

Officials said they did not know the turkey would be there or that Bush would pick it up. A contractor had roasted and primped the turkey to adorn the buffet line, while the 600 soldiers were served from cafeteria-style steam trays, the officials said. They said the bird was not placed there in anticipation of Bush's stealthy visit, and military sources said a trophy turkey is a standard feature of holiday chow lines.

The scene, which lasted just a few seconds, was not visible to a reporter who was there but was recorded by a pool photographer and described by officials yesterday in response to questions raised in Washington.

Bush's standing rose in a poll conducted immediately after the trip. Administration officials said the presidential stop provided a morale boost that troops in Iraq are still talking about, and helped reassure Iraqis about U.S. intentions.

Nevertheless, the foray has opened new credibility questions for a White House that has dealt with issues as small as who placed the "Mission Accomplished" banner aboard the aircraft carrier Bush used to proclaim the end of major combat operations in Iraq, and as major as assertions about Saddam Hussein's arsenal of unconventional weapons and his ability to threaten the United States.

The White House has updated its account of an airborne conversation in which a British Airways pilot wondered into his radio if he had just seen Air Force One and was told that it was a Gulfstream 5, a much smaller plane. White House officials first said that the British Airways pilot had talked with the Air Force One pilot. Bush aides now say the conversation occurred between the British Airways pilot and an air traffic control worker.

"I don't think everybody was clear on exactly how that conversation happened," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.

British Airways said it has been unable to confirm the new version. "We've looked into it," a spokeswoman said from London. "It didn't happen."

White House officials do not deny that they craft elaborate events to showcase Bush, but they maintain that these events are designed to accurately dramatize his policies and to convey qualities about him that are real.

"This was effective, because it captured something about the president that people know is true, that he really cares about the soldiers and gets emotional when he sees them," Mary Matalin, a former administration official, said about the trip to Baghdad. "You have to figure out how to capture the Bush we know, even if it doesn't come through in a speech situation or a press conference. He regularly rejects anything that is not him."

The Democratic presidential candidates tipped their hats to the White House stage managers by refusing to criticize the trip, which dominated weekend newscasts.

Aides to the Democrats said they concluded that the less said about the trip, the better. In the view of these aides, the trip produced reassuring images of a situation that has badly deteriorated, and Democrats just wanted the moment to pass so they could go back to criticizing Bush's postwar policy.

A poll conducted four days after Thanksgiving by the National Annenberg Election Survey put Bush's job approval rating at 61 percent, up from 56 percent during the four days before the holiday. His job disapproval rating dropped from 41 percent to 36 percent. His personal popularity increased from 65 percent to 72 percent. The polls of 789 people before Thanksgiving and 847 people after Thanksgiving each had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

The trip was pulled off in total secrecy -- only a few Bush aides and reporters knew about it in advance, and they were allowed to discuss it only on secure phone lines. Reporters covering the Thanksgiving program in Baghdad were not allowed to report the event until after Air Force One had left.

Some of the reporters left behind at Crawford Middle School, where they work when Bush is staying at his Texas ranch, felt they had been deceived by White House accounts of what Bush would be doing on Thanksgiving.

Correspondent Mark Knoller said Sunday on "CBS Evening News" that the misleading information and deception were understandable, but that he had been "filing radio reports that amounted to fiction."

"Even as President Bush was addressing U.S. personnel in Baghdad, I was on the air saying he was at his ranch making holiday phone calls to American troops overseas," Knoller said. "I got that information from a White House official that very



To: tsigprofit who wrote (4838)12/4/2003 4:49:37 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
A Brewing Constitutional Crisis
Afghan Delegate Meetings Foreshadow Difficult Battles
By Pamela Constable
Washington Post Foreign Service
Thursday, December 4, 2003; Page A01

GARDEZ, Afghanistan -- More than 650 turbaned elders milled outside a U.N. voting tent Tuesday, clutching copies of a formal white document. Some fumbled with rarely worn spectacles as they peered at the tiny print; others frowned and jotted careful notes next to certain items.




There was no time for tea and gossip. The nation was preparing to debate and adopt a new constitution after 25 years of war and lawlessness, and the elders, gathered in a schoolyard to elect candidates for the upcoming constitutional assembly, already knew what they wanted from the charter.

"We want democracy, but only if it is according to Islamic law," asserted Nasrullah, 55, a farmer from Ghazni province, as a dozen men around him nodded vigorously. "In this document it is written that killing criminals is not allowed, but we need qisas to stop crime," he said, referring to the Islamic doctrine of eye-for-an-eye vengeance. "This is not the law of the Taliban. It is the law of God."

The gathered elders agreed, in principle, that women should be able to participate in the assembly, provided they wear proper Islamic head coverings. But the lone woman candidate was nowhere to be seen. She spent the day segregated in a classroom, cut off from all the discussion, and she said no one had given her a copy of the proposed constitution.

As more than 19,000 delegates gathered in eight cities this week to choose 500 members of the constitutional assembly, or loya jirga, the impassioned and often contradictory views of delegates foreshadowed a long, heated battle at the meeting, due to open Wednesday, and reflected the deep strains in a society pulled both toward a rural, religious past and a future as a modern nation.

The Afghan government, headed by President Hamid Karzai, presented a draft constitution to the public one month ago. Under the U.N.-mandated political process, it must be ratified by the loya jirga before presidential elections can be held next year, to be followed by parliamentary voting.

Officials said they tried to strike a balance between the demands of various political and religious groups, but the document drew criticism from conservative and progressive forces. Human rights groups said it failed to adequately protect women's rights, judicial independence and religious minorities, while student groups protested that it did not guarantee the right to free higher education.

Among the delegates and candidates from Ghazni and Parwan provinces, however, there was near-universal concern that the proposed constitution was too secular and modern, giving insufficient power to Islamic law and custom. Their comments suggested that the assembly could split deeply over the balance of political power and competing visions of modern and traditional Islam. In Kabul Stadium, where more than 500, mostly ethnic Tajik delegates from Parwan gathered inside a giant tent Monday, the mood was serious and attentive. Many delegates were veterans of guerrilla struggles against both communist and Taliban forces, and they appeared keenly appreciative of the historic chance to build a peaceful, politically modern nation.

And yet the dominant sentiment in the tent was one of belligerent opposition to the proposed system of a strong executive and weaker parliament, which delegates said failed to ensure the rights of ethnic minorities and northern Afghan "freedom fighters" like themselves. The original constitution proposed by a commission included a prime minister, but Karzai had the position removed.

"Our country's future is at stake here, and we do not want the blood of the martyrs to be wasted," said Mahmad Yacoub, 47. "We need a parliamentary system with a strong prime minister so the rights of the poor and the freedom fighters will not be abused. Just as we struggled against Russia, so we will struggle in the loya jirga."

The depth of ethnic feeling was also reflected in criticisms of other provisions -- that the national anthem be sung in Pashto, the Pashtun dialect, instead of Dari, the Tajik dialect, and that Mohammed Zahir Shah, 88, the former Afghan monarch, be named "father of the nation."

Delegates from less secure neighboring provinces are traveling to Gardez, a well-protected provincial capital 65 miles south of Kabul, all week to vote. On Tuesday delegates from Ghazni, a conservative ethnic Pashtun region, joked and posed excitedly for photographs, but they also expressed suspicion that the proposed constitution might erode their religious laws, ethnic rights and cultural traditions.

Mahmad Samander, a candidate and teacher from Ghazni, said he had read all 161 articles in the draft "very carefully" and had taken notes on dozens of items that he found contradictory to Islam. Like other delegates, he expressed concern at the references to international treaties, women's rights and permission for minority Shiite Muslims to be judged according to Shiite legal precepts.

"We want Islamic law, not international law. It is what so many of us fought and died for," he said, referring specifically to the Sunni strain of Islam, which is followed by 80 percent of Afghans. "If I am elected to the loya jirga, I will employ all my boldness as a former freedom fighter to eliminate or amend every un-Islamic item."

Yet despite professing such conservative views, Samander and other delegates from Ghazni and Parwan argued strongly for the right of all Afghans to attend state universities at no cost, saying otherwise only the "children of the rich" would learn. The current draft does not guarantee free higher education.

Afghan officials said the current draft reflects a moderate vision of Islam that is shared by most Afghans and will help the country's emergence into the modern world, but that some interest groups are trying to fuel Muslim concerns for their own political gain.

"The constitution says this is an Islamic country, but we must make sure we are talking about a modern Islam, one that is consistent with progress, with science, and with economic development," said Vice President Hedayat Amin Arsala in an interview in Kabul. "Some people want to use religion for political purposes, but constitutions cannot be made for groups or individuals. They are made for the entire nation."

Officials from the United Nations, which is supervising the loya jirga, said this week that the selection of voters and candidates has gone smoothly, despite fears of intimidation or abuse by ethnic militias or other groups. This week, delegates from all 32 provinces are selecting candidates by secret ballot. Separate special elections are being held for women, nomads, refugees and other minority groups, with a limited number of seats reserved for each.

In some rural provinces, though, few women have come forward as candidates and some have complained that officials discouraged them from participating. In Ghazni, the women's election had to be held twice, U.N. officials said, and in Paktika, a province with high poverty and illiteracy rates, only one woman candidate registered, so officials selected a second to fill the provincial quota.

On Tuesday, the sole female candidate to reach Gardez was Gulsum, 28, a health worker. She waited all day in the chilly classroom with her husband -- all women attending election events and the loya jirga itself must be escorted by a male relative, according to Afghan custom -- while the 600-plus male delegates mingled, chatted and ate lunch outside.

"In my district, none of the women knew anything about the loya jirga, including me, and none of us was given a chance to read the constitution," Gulsum said, huddled beneath a blanket but smiling gamely as she waited for the outcome of her district. "I want to serve my people and help other Afghan women participate in public life, because they have never had the chance before."



To: tsigprofit who wrote (4838)12/4/2003 5:35:22 PM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 20773
 
There is nothing too trivial for Bush to lie about.
(Under Rove/Rice directions)

TP



To: tsigprofit who wrote (4838)12/5/2003 3:48:57 AM
From: Coz  Respond to of 20773
 
tsig, funny that I don't have a problem exactly with the fake turkey. Having been a photographer, I understand the use of props and don't see them as deceptive, but more as a means of conveying a message.

But what I do have a problem with is that this president (or any president) can use "our" AF-1 and drag along "fake" reporters who have signed away their right to acquire and dispense news. After signing the required agreements, they were nothing more that cheer-leading press agents under the thumb of George Bush.

The pictures will look fine in his scrape book I'm sure, but if there ever ought to be a law, it should be one that forbids a president from committing brash actions with public money, and endangering peoples' lives for the sake of getting a few high quality photos for his re-election campaign.

I sure hope that the soldiers got some joy out of this stunt. It's just too bad that they also reduced to "props" for the sake of the president's reelection campaign.

I am sick of this world of propaganda we live in now, and I'd love a way to have campaigns where the candidates debated the important issues talking about how their plan would be the best... instead of months and months of name calling and muck raking.

I don't know how we are ever supposed to rally behind a leader when entire elections are won by calling the opponents the scum or the earth.

--Cozzz



To: tsigprofit who wrote (4838)12/7/2003 9:35:52 AM
From: Ron  Respond to of 20773
 
Many Seniors to get Unpleasant Surprise January 1

New Medicare Bill Bars Extra Insurance for Drugs
By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON, Dec. 6 — Medicare beneficiaries will not be allowed to buy insurance to cover their share of prescription drug costs under the new Medicare bill to be signed on Monday by President Bush, the legislation says.

Millions of Medicare beneficiaries have bought private insurance to fill gaps in Medicare. But a little-noticed provision of the legislation prohibits the sale of any Medigap policy that would help pay drug costs after Jan. 1, 2006, when the new Medicare drug benefit becomes available.

This is one of many surprises awaiting beneficiaries, who will find big gaps in the drug benefit and might want private insurance to plug the holes — just as they buy insurance to supplement Medicare coverage of doctors' services and hospital care.

Congress cited two reasons for banning the sale of Medigap drug policies. Lawmakers wanted to prevent duplication of the new Medicare benefit. They also wanted to be sure that beneficiaries would bear some of the cost. Health economists have long asserted that when beneficiaries are insulated from the costs, they tend to overuse medical services.

Gail E. Shearer, a health policy analyst at Consumers Union, said she had mixed feelings about the prohibition.

"I don't want a return to abuses of 1970's and 80's, when lots of confusing Medigap policies were sold to vulnerable seniors," Ms. Shearer said. But she added: "Many seniors and disabled people will face a huge gap in drug coverage. In a bill that's marketed as providing choice to consumers, comprehensive drug coverage is not really an option. That's a disappointment."

The new drug benefit would be the biggest expansion of Medicare since creation of the program in 1965. But patients would still face substantial costs.