Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (504098)	12/5/2003 11:06:09 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Well, I had hoped you would see that the question is comprehensively stupid." >>> <G> You 'saying' that it's 'stupid' doesn't get it --- you have to 'prove' that it's stupid. For I can just as easily say that YOUR earlier statement is stupid... which it is. And I believe I illustrated just how stupid your statement was by my simple question --- which you refuse to answer. "Your question simply does not apply to my position, which is that unlike nature...." >>> Sure it does! You said nature has the 'moral right' to decide who lives or dies... I simply tried to determine if you obeyed this 'morality', or if you personally attempted to thwart it's will at every opportunity! "I cannot possibly judge nature by saying it is "OK" for it to use diptheria." >>> The question was: do you resist this 'moral will' of nature, and do you encourage others to resist it? Do you pick and choose a la carte style, when it is 'OK' to resist the 'will of nature', and when it is not?