SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SCO Group (SCOX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (113)12/24/2003 7:34:19 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Respond to of 239
 
New Survey Finds No Linux 'Chill' From SCO Suit

internetnews.com

December 23, 2003

By Michael Floyd

The SCO Group's lawsuit against IBM and new warnings of legal action by SCO against other companies over its claim that copyrighted code slipped into select versions of the Linux kernel (define) are not slowing deployments of the open source operating system, an upcoming study has found.

Evan Bauer, a principal research fellow with Robert Frances Group (http://www.rfgonline.com), said a just-completed survey the IT consulting firm conducted with 15 companies about Linux deployments suggests that cost-savings and the General Public License, or GPL (define), are trumping any concerns about SCO Group's (Quote, Chart) claim of copyright infringement within parts of Linux.

"None [of the companies surveyed] have concluded they're liable in any way," he said. The survey asked companies whether the SCO lawsuit was impacting their deployment plans.

In addition to SCO Group's action against IBM (Quote, Chart), which accuses Big Blue of contributing copyrighted code from its version of UNIX into the open source operating system, IBM has counter sued SCO Group in response to the $3 billion claim. Red Hat (Quote, Chart), the number one distributor of versions of Linux, filed a formal complaint last August against SCO Group in a bid to show that it did not infringe any intellectual property of SCO.

About half of the companies in the survey, which is expected to be released in January, checked with their legal departments about any potential exposure to the issue. For example, if a court ruled in favor of SCO in finding that some parts of the Linux kernel were copyrighted, would companies running Linux have to pay SCO license fees?

"Many feel they are absolutely protected by the GPL [General Public License]," Bauer said, referring to the open source software license (also called GNU GPL) that details how the open source operating system software and its source code can be freely copied, distributed and modified.

The companies in the survey represented a cross-section of sectors such as manufacturing, retail, financial services, and universities.

Bauer, a former chief technology officer with CSFB who is active in securities industry technology working groups, said the companies were queried about their return on investment regarding Linux, and whether they felt legal issues might slow their deployment of Linux in their IT environments.

The early results of the survey provide something of a counterpoint to some tech analysts' warnings that IBM's decision not to provide indemnification to customers before the SCO/IBM dispute goes to trial could hamstring Linux deployments with enterprise customers.

Laura DiDio, senior analyst for The Yankee Group, has called IBM's stance on the issue a "disservice" to the Linux and open source community. "For Linux to take its place alongside UNIX, Windows, and NetWare in the enterprise, it must be worthy in both a business and technological sense. That means strong indemnification," DiDio wrote in a research note about the issue.

Gartner's George Weiss has also counseled caution to both sides as a result of the litigation. In a November note, he recommended that enterprise customers keep a low profile and not divulge details on Linux deployments. He also counseled clients not to pay SCO any license fees until the allegations are settled.

"Fence off the innocuous Linux deployments (such as network-edge solutions) from the performance-intensive ones. Where feasible, delay deployment of high-performance systems until the end of first quarter of 2004 to see what SCO will do," Weiss wrote.

But the results by the Robert Frances Group's survey so far suggest the "big chill" that the SCO/IBM dispute was expected to set off has been anything but.

Christopher Dudley, an operating vice president for Federated Department Stores (which was not a part of the survey), echoed the sentiment, but also clarified the role that Linux is playing in the retail company's networks.

"Despite the SCO/IBM legal issues we are continuing to look into further deployments of Linux into some of our core business areas including www.macys.com and www.bloomingdales.com," he said, referring to Web sites of the respective department stores that Federated also owns.

With annual sales of more than $15.4 billion, Federated currently operates more than 450 stores in 34 states, Guam and Puerto Rico. Within that structure Federated currently runs a small number of Linux-based servers. And Dudley also pointed out that the company also runs a large number of proprietary, Unix-based servers from Sun, HP, and IBM.

"The dispute hasn't really yet become a factor in our Linux deployment strategy. As with most companies today, we continue to aggressively pursue cost-saving areas. Linux fits in this space. That, coupled with our direction to make the lower-level operating system components of the infrastructure a commodity currently makes Linux a powerful tool in support of our business," he said.

At least five other companies that internetnews.com contacted declined to comment on whether they were or are considering Linux deployments, and if so, if the SCO/IBM copyright dispute has slowed their plans.

In Bauer's survey for Robert Frances Group, the companies concluded they would not be liable if they deploy Linux, preferring instead to view the SCO/IBM dispute as an issue between vendors. "And if there are any remedies related to a settlement they would be non-financial," Bauer added. Moreover, he said the sentiment among the companies was that the existing lawsuit against IBM would be difficult to extend to them because they had no "intent to damage SCO."

As to whether Linux is supplanting mission-critical operating systems, the survey results are unclear so far. But the early results dovetail with other trends that suggest 2004 could be an even bigger year for Linux gains in the enterprise.

Merrill Lynch, whose technology group recently began coverage of Red Hat, noted in a research note last week that "open source and Linux adoption is still in infancy in the enterprise market." However, "we should see explosive growth in the years to come as corporations look to achieve cost savings within their IT departments."

Using IDC's own estimate for Linux server shipments through 2007, as well as its internal data on Linux operating system attach rates and server pricing, Merrill reckons that the enterprise Linux market could be worth $529 million by 2007. "This represents a [compound annual growth rate] of 61 percent over the 5-year period from 2002-2007," the note said.

In related developments, Novell (Quote, Chart), which is purchasing Linux distributor SUSE Linux, said this week that it continues to assert ownership of UNIX copyrights and "has applied for and received copyright registrations pertaining to UNIX consistent with that position." Linus Torvalds, who created Linux, has weighed in on the latest SCO maneuvers with a response on Groklaw in which he says he personally checked the history of some of the disputed code, and "can definitely say that those files are trivially written by me personally, with no copying from any UNIX code _ever_."

With additional reporting by Erin Joyce



To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (113)1/12/2004 7:40:59 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 239
 
Fund Planned to Defend Users of Linux

nytimes.com

By STEVE LOHR

Published: January 12, 2004

A group of companies, led by I.B.M. and Intel, plans to announce today that it is setting up a $10 million legal defense fund to help pay for the litigation costs of corporate users of the popular GNU Linux operating system if they are sued.

The defense fund is the latest move in a legal and marketing chess match that pits the companies and programmers supporting Linux against a small Utah company, the SCO Group. SCO owns the license rights to the Unix operating system and contends that Linux, a variant of Unix, violates its license and copyright. Its opponents deny this and say the company's rights are nowhere near as broad as SCO contends.

SCO began a campaign last year to collect fees from companies that support and use Linux. It first sued I.B.M., the world's largest computer company and a leading corporate champion of Linux, accusing it of illegally contributing Unix code to Linux and seeking $1 billion in damages. I.B.M. has denied the accusations.

SCO has hired one the nation's best-known litigators, David Boies, the lead trial lawyer for the Justice Department in the antitrust case against Microsoft. In November, Mr. Boies said that SCO planned to select and sue a large corporate user of Linux within three months.

Last month, SCO sent warning letters to several hundred corporate users of Linux, stating its contentions and threatening to sue. "We believe these violations are serious, and we will take appropriate actions to protect our rights," the letters said.

The legal defense fund is an effort to allay the worries and reduce the risk to corporations, which increasingly use Linux as an operating system to run data-serving computers that power big networks and Web sites. Linux is distributed free, and is debugged and improved by a global community of programmers. Technology companies do charge for providing technical support for Linux, and manufacturers sell a lot of server computers that run the Linux system. In corporate data centers, Linux has emerged as a strong alternative to Unix and Microsoft Windows.

The fund is to be administered by the Open Source Development Laboratories, a consortium seeking to hasten the adoption of Linux. The group's 30 members, besides I.B.M. and Intel, include companies like Hewlett-Packard, Dell and Novell.

The lab employs, among others, Linus Torvalds, the Finnish programmer who wrote the initial kernel of Linux and oversees the development of the operating system.

The $10 million figure is a target for the fund, but one that should be easily reached, said Stuart Cohen, chief executive of the consortium. "Several million dollars" have already been collected in recent days, Mr. Cohen said, from I.B.M., Intel and MontaVista Software, which makes Linux-based software used in communications and consumer electronics devices. Several other members of the open source group have expressed a willingness to contribute, he said.

The funds, Mr. Cohen added, could also be used to defend Mr. Torvalds in case he is sued personally. SCO has not threatened to sue him.