Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (24087)	12/6/2003 3:22:45 AM
From: limtex	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 60323

AB - This could be a very short stay for SNDK in the index<gg> Actaully Eli could go down in the record books. In and out within a month. Does it work like that or is there a mechanism for keeping it there or is the reuiqrement a lot lower than $50. Best, L

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (24087)	12/6/2003 3:47:15 AM
From: limtex	Respond to of 60323

AB - Reading Aus's latest if he is right then what on earth is there for anone to remain in the stock. No-wonder there is a mass exodous. And even if he doesn't turn out to be right then the effect of his logic will be to dampen any buying interest in the stock for months. Aus has followed this stock for years and no-one knows more than he does about the overall business. Best, L

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (24087)	12/6/2003 7:30:37 AM
From: limtex	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 60323

AB - That mess in Taiwan is interesting. 1. It has to be the biggest theft in the history of the World. If not then it is way up there. 2. How could someine sell all that stock without anyone knowing about it. Would the company have to be informed, wouldn't the stock exchange in Taiwan know or have to register anything? 3. What on earth was that amount of easily saleable paper doing in the hands of a law firm seven thousand miles away? 4. What did the US legal advisors or auditors say about the security of their clients assets or the assets they were auditing. What was the advice. $127m in a few bits of easily moveable paper is a material risk. 5. Whose idea was it to keep that amount of uncontrolled easily sold liquidity in Taiwan? 6. What do the Taiwanese authoirites say about this? If they say caveat emptor and you should have know that this assets were in an unsafe place then what about the US lawyers and accoutants, didn't they know? Who advised on the deal and who charged fees? 7. What does the US Gov/trade organisations have to say? Should we be doing business with Taiwan still. Maybe we should ahve listened to the Chinese Government all along and let them have Taiwan back. 8. How excatly does one hide the sale of the proceeds of $127m. Its not exactly chopped liver here. This is serious money and must be in someones bank account. Whose and where? You can't just lose $127m in cash. Best, L