Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (504528)	12/5/2003 5:21:28 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769669

"But I think it's best to vote for the party with 50% of its politicians insane spenders, as opposed to the party with 100% insane spenders." >>> Interesting approach... but hardly effective (more than 50% of them all are 'back-benchers', with little influence or power to change things). >>> I suggest a potentially BETTER approach: >>> Just add up which bunch 1) adds the most to the deficit, 2) increases the size and power and intrusiveness of the government the most, and never vote for those particular slimeballs again. >>> PS - ignore them all when their lips move --- just watch the ACTIONS.

To: Bill who wrote (504528)	12/5/2003 5:40:34 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 769669

<But I think it's best to vote for the party with 50% of its politicians insane spenders, as opposed to the party with 100% insane spenders.> I don't know what planet your living on Bill. The Bush-monkey has been spending like a "drunken sailor" (John McCain's words). That's with Republican control of both houses of Congress. Discretionary domestic spending is running 20.8%, despite his saying he'd keep it at 4%. He hasn't vetoed one spending bill, because they reward his corporate buddies. We are having our future looted by this administration. I think he's doing it because he knows he won't be around in a year.