Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Can you beat 50% per month? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flushbusted who wrote (6699)	12/6/2003 1:50:56 PM
From: Smiling Bob	Respond to of 19257

Nice move on DBBD. But in the spirit of "honesty" and "accountability", just where exactly did you post it as a buy??? It's truly ashame you feel a need to make yourself look very silly and continue harping on some delusionary OPTV posts, especially when my last posts were pretty clear regarding short term direction. The only explanation I can come up with is you bought high and sold low and are looking for a scapegoat. So let's review one more time and if you still have any questions or can find anything contradictory that follows these posts, seek advice elsewhere. I would think most investors would be very pleased with the suggestions spelled out below. At 4.42 Message 19498367 To:scottonstocks who wrote (6642) From: scottonstocks Thursday, Nov 13, 2003 11:17 AM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6699 OPTV - clarification 4.42 ask A buy for longer term, as without positive news, there are likely better places to invest short term I don't see significant immediate upside without news And then , at $3.95, some 30% above current close and just over 2 weeks ago Message 19502561 To:scottonstocks who wrote (6644) From: scottonstocks Friday, Nov 14, 2003 2:24 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6699 OPTV - 3.95 x 96 Don't be surprised if it gets under 3 short term

To: flushbusted who wrote (6699)	12/6/2003 2:31:57 PM
From: Smiling Bob	Respond to of 19257

I don't know why you need to push the issue, so let's return to some elementary reading comprehension. And then later, we could define "accountability","honesty", and even "clarity" if need be. Of the two posts below in which DBBD is first mentioned on this thread, which of the following more clearly suggests DBBD might be a buy? >>>>>>> THIS <<<<<<<<< To:scottonstocks who wrote (6547) From: flushbusted Monday, Nov 3, 2003 10:55 AM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6700 Scott, ever hear about DBBD?, it was recommended to me. Thanks flush >>>>>>>> OR <<<<<<<<<<<< Message 19460756 To:flushbusted who wrote (6551) From: scottonstocks Monday, Nov 3, 2003 2:10 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6700 DBBD watching- did a little cking, and worthy of a buy @ .26 ask - new highs

To: flushbusted who wrote (6699)	12/6/2003 2:35:59 PM
From: Smiling Bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19257

And what's more pitiful, is that you claimed to have been in OPTV before you even posted on this thread. so how exactly is it MY "losing trade"?????? Take responsibility for your own actions and move on to the next one. Message 19460608 To:scottonstocks who wrote (6550) From: flushbusted Monday, Nov 3, 2003 1:41 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6701 Scott, 2 others I am in are OPTV and IMM (formerly IMMT), both up sharply over the last 6 months. Both hold a lot of risk at these levels. Thanks Flush