SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: laura_bush who wrote (269783)12/6/2003 3:42:52 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Respond to of 436258
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

December 6, 2003
MEDICINE
Hundreds of U.S. Troops Infected by Parasite Borne by Sand Flies, Army Says
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

HILADELPHIA, Dec. 5 — Hundreds of American troops in Iraq have been infected with a parasite spread by biting sand flies, and the long-term consequences are still unknown, Army doctors said Friday.

The resulting disease, leishmaniasis, has been diagnosed in about 150 military personnel so far, but that is sure to climb in the coming months, the doctors said.

All have only the skin form of the disease, which creates ugly "volcano crater" lesions that may last for months, but usually clear up by themselves.

None have developed the visceral form that attacks the liver and spleen and is fatal if untreated. Military doctors have told all troops who were in the region to carefully watch themselves for persistent fevers.

Sand flies may actually disrupt some units' missions, said Lt. Col. Glenn Wortmann, an infectious disease specialist at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, who is treating many patients.

Although the skin form of the disease is not life-threatening, 100 to 200 soldiers in some units have been badly bitten and are in danger of developing the disease. Right now, those that develop leishmaniasis lesions are sent back to Walter Reed for treatment. Those soldiers are lost to duty for 30 to 40 days, Colonel Wortmann said.

Almost all Iraqis killed by the visceral form of the disease are malnourished children under 5, not healthy adults. "For us in the military, that's a good thing," said Lt. Col. Russell E. Coleman, an insect specialist with the 520th Theater Army Medical Laboratory, who gave a presentation here to the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. "We're well fed and have healthy immune systems, so hopefully we won't see visceral leishmaniasis in even one soldier."

The soldiers were bitten during the dry, hot season that began in March, just after the invasion began, but the disease can take months to develop. Iraqi doctors told American doctors that in Iraq cases usually peaked in December and January.

Only about 32 of the 500,000 American troops involved in the Persian Gulf war a decade ago developed skin leishmaniasis, he said. But that war was fought mostly in Kuwait in colder weather, before the fly season. However, a dozen developed visceral leishmaniasis. All recovered.

No treatment for either form of leishmaniasis has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, but the military gives 10 to 20 days of intravenous Pentostam, a 50-year-old drug recommended by the World Health Organization.

Civilians, including contractor employees, can get the drug through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said Dr. Philip Coyne, a treatment specialist at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Medical Research.

Pentostam speeds healing, with less scarring, and doctors hope it helps prevent skin leishmaniasis from becoming visceral. However, long-term Pentostam can poison the liver and pancreas and is hard to administer in war areas.

Dr. Coleman estimates that more than 1,000 cases may be diagnosed by February. His unit, based at Tallil Air Base near Nasiriya, specializes in detecting and treating chemical and biological warfare, he said, and detects diseases like malaria. "But we spent 95 percent of our time on leishmaniasis," he said.

Dr. Coleman found soldiers who got more than 200 bites in a single night, he said. Because of the heat, he said, soldiers ignored precautions, sleeping outside in their underwear and scorning insect repellent because sand stuck to it.

Sleeping inside under mosquito netting is recommended, though the military's nets had mesh too large to stop Iraq's sand flies, which are about one-quarter the size of mosquitoes.

Air Force tents at Tallil, where 15,000 troops were stationed, were air-conditioned and some had cement floors, so they had few flies, Dr. Coleman said. Army tents were hot and were built on the ground or on wood slats, under which mice and other rodents that can also carry the parasite that causes leishmaniasis scampered freely.

Dr. Coleman said that military officials at the base took precautions, like spraying insecticides, killing rodents and shooting stray dogs, which can also be infected. Nonetheless, the flies persisted through the hot season, he said.

Now the soldiers they bit are turning up at Walter Reed in numbers that have risen to more than 40 a day. "It's going to be a long slog — as long as we're in Iraq," Colonel Wortmann said.

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top



To: laura_bush who wrote (269783)12/6/2003 4:02:04 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Respond to of 436258
 
December 6, 2003
MARKET PLACE
Computer Mishap Sends a Stock on a Wild Ride
By FLOYD NORRIS

computer system gone amok combined with intensely competitive stock markets and indecision by Nasdaq officials to create wild trading in a single stock yesterday. As a result, some traders were left with big losses even though they had bought low and sold high.

The dispute led to finger-pointing. Officials of some markets criticized the Archipelago electronic network for resuming trading in the stock before other markets did, and Archipelago faulted Nasdaq for not clearly explaining what was happening.

The stock involved was Corinthian Colleges, a company based in Santa Ana, Calif., that operates colleges in several states. But the action in the stock had nothing to do with the company.

The trading problem served to highlight the growing fragmentation of trading in Nasdaq stocks, with officials of competing markets relying on Nasdaq for regulatory decisions and trying to take business from it. The problem also showed how bad trades entered into one electronic terminal can quickly spread to all markets.

In the end, many trades were canceled. But that decision was made after the stock had first been halted and then allowed to resume trading without any statement that the earlier trades might be canceled.

One money manager, speaking on condition that he not be identified, said last night that his clients had bought 5,000 shares of the stock at $41.95 and then sold 2,500 shares at $52.99, while locking in profits on the other shares with a trade in options. When the earlier buy was canceled, the later trades left his clients having sold shares they thought they owned but did not. By then the price had risen further, forcing them to buy shares at high prices.

"Instead of a gain, the clients are looking at a huge, huge loss," he said. "And they did nothing wrong."

The problem appears to have begun with an order to sell that was entered into a system that Gr8Trade, a subsidiary of Instinet Group, leases to brokerage firms. The system allows a firm's customers to enter their orders directly into the system, and sends them to markets for execution.

"There was some sort of system glitch," said Andrew Goldman, executive vice president of Instinet Group. "We are trying to figure out precisely what it was and who caused it. It appears that the result was an unintended effect on the stock in question."

Other market officials said that the sell order apparently went into an electronic loop, endlessly repeating. Then automatic systems sprayed those orders throughout the market.

The price plunged, falling from $57.50 at 10:46 a.m. to a low of $39.25 at 10:54 a.m. Mr. Goldman said that Gr8Trade officials noticed the trading and notified Nasdaq of a possible problem.

A Nasdaq official, who declined to be quoted by name, said Nasdaq contacted the company and was told there was no news to explain the move. It halted trading at 10:58 a.m.

Other markets also halted trading. The Archipelago electronic network allowed trading to resume at 11:19 a.m., before there had been any indication that trades might be canceled. The price of the stock gradually rose.

Nasdaq officials said that before they resumed trading at 11:55 a.m., they sent out a notice to members saying that trades were being questioned. At 12:28 p.m., they announced the trades were canceled, and other markets did the same.

Kevin Foley, the chief executive of Bloomberg Tradebook, an electronic exchange, criticized Archipelago for resuming trading early, and said he was disappointed that Nasdaq had resumed its own trading before announcing the cancellations.

Margaret Nagle, an Archipelago spokeswoman, said that firm acted responsibly. "Our decision to reopen trading at 11:19 was based on the fact we learned from Nasdaq that this was not a regulatory halt and felt that the market was in a position to produce prices with integrity on this stock," she said. Regulatory halts are mandatory for all markets, and can be imposed to allow dissemination of news about a company. She said that when Archipelago allowed trading to resume, it did not know that trades might be canceled.

Some exchange officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said they had little sympathy for traders who bought stock at the low prices, and then lost money when they sold the stock before learning that the earlier trade was being canceled. "They should have known that was too good to be true," one said.

Such losses would have been prevented if the markets had not resumed trading until a decision was made on which trades, if any, should be canceled. But with markets intensely competitive, trading resumed before officials had made their decisions. The losers were traders who were not responsible for the errors or the slow decision making.

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top