SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Natural Resource Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: isopatch who wrote (4521)12/8/2003 12:43:14 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108733
 
natgas at 6.61 (probably nearby futures contract) / jw



To: isopatch who wrote (4521)12/8/2003 12:52:59 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108733
 
CNBC interview of Robt Hormatz (Goldman Sux ViceChairman)

serious concern of US trade gap, current account deficit
also, foreign central banks are rebalancing away from the US$ and into other major currencies like the EURO

the threat is to USTBonds, and not to stocks
since foreign investors primarily hold bonds
(45% of USTBonds, 25% of corp bonds, 12% of stocks)

US$ decline is not a concern now
later it could result in higher interest rates
it could cause higher price inflation, which is low now
higher imported product prices could occur later on
inflation pressures are there

the winners are US exporters from increased competitiveness
e.g. hightech
also, multinationals benefit from conversion on foreign operations

if the effect hits import prices, they could go up a lot
and hurt companies like WalMart
which would hit toys, shoes, textiles

however, if the USDollar must decline in order to rectify the trade deficit, then it must decline to a considerable further extent

/ jim

p.s. ME
he fails to address the mortgage effect, the agency convexity effect (resulting in FannyMae sales of hedged positions), and the entire issue of reduced Asian willingness to finance a crippled economy