Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (506473)	12/9/2003 8:48:03 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

you need to get some help for your sick mind, and you are the only one that cannot see that.

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (506473)	12/9/2003 9:59:16 AM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The GROPINATOR is DROPPING HIS SELF INVESTIGATION!!!!!! Woman is suing him and his campaign boyz for falsely accusing one woman of being an Ex Con....of course SHE ISN"T!..... CC

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (506473)	12/9/2003 12:27:13 PM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Diebold's UNAUDTABLE voting machines are the biggest threat to a free and Democratic America that we have ever faced. The mainline media are avoiding this important story. WHY? Del

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (506473)	12/9/2003 3:15:22 PM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Inviting Bush supporters to a fund-raiser, the host wrote, "I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." No surprise there. But Walden O'Dell — who says that he wasn't talking about his business operations — happens to be the chief executive of Diebold Inc., whose touch-screen voting machines are in increasingly widespread use across the United States. For example, Georgia — where Republicans scored spectacular upset victories in the 2002 midterm elections — relies exclusively on Diebold machines. To be clear, though there were many anomalies in that 2002 vote, there is no evidence that the machines miscounted. But there is also no evidence that the machines counted correctly. You see, Diebold machines leave no paper trail. Representative Rush Holt of New Jersey, who has introduced a bill requiring that digital voting machines leave a paper trail and that their software be available for public inspection, is occasionally told that systems lacking these safeguards haven't caused problems. "How do you know?" he asks. What we do know about Diebold does not inspire confidence. The details are technical, but they add up to a picture of a company that was, at the very least, extremely sloppy about security, and may have been trying to cover up product defects... nytimes.com Del