SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: j-at-home who wrote (270373)12/11/2003 12:47:21 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
German Judge Frees 9/11 Suspect, Citing New Evidence
By DESMOND BUTLER

Published: December 11, 2003

ERLIN, Dec. 11 — A judge surprised a Hamburg courtroom today by ordering the release of a Moroccan man accused of aiding the Sept. 11 hijackers, after the German police said they had seen evidence that a witness had testified to American interrogators that only four people from the Hamburg cell knew of the attack.

The man who was freed, Abdelghani Mzoudi, had been on trial on charges of being an accessory in the deaths of more than 3,000 people in the attacks in the United States.

But Judge Klaus Ruehle expressed doubt today that the defendant had knowledge of the attacks. "There is the serious possibility that Mzoudi, despite his involvement and his visit to Afghanistan, was deliberately excluded from planning for the attacks and did not consciously provide a supportive role," the judge said, according to Reuters.

By implication, the judge's decision also raised questions about the conviction of another man in the case, Mounir el-Motassadeq, who was sentenced this year to 15 years after being convicted of similar charges.

After Judge Ruehle's action to free Mr. Mzoudi, Mr. Motassadeq's lawyers immediately filed papers seeking his release and renewed their appeal of his conviction.

"This is a bombshell," said Hans Leistritz, who represented Mr. Motassadeq at his trial.

The new evidence concerned testimony of an unidentified witness who was said to have asserted that only four members of the Qaeda cell that planned and carried out the attacks had advance knowledge of them. This witness identified those four as three of the four suicide-hijacking pilots and an associate of Ramzi bin al-Shibh, who has been described by the American authorities as a central figure in the logistics of the Sept. 11 plotting.

A prosecutor told the courtroom that by a process of elimination, the unidentified witness must be Mr. bin al-Shibh, who was arrested in Pakistan a year after the attacks and remains in American custody.

Judge Ruehle said the new evidence raised sufficient doubt that Mr. Mzoudi was aware that his actions as described by prosecutors were in support of a terrorist attack.

German prosecutors indicted Mr. Mzoudi in May on charges of 3,066 counts of accessory to murder in connection with the 9/11 attacks. He denied the charges.

Mr. Motassadeq, a former roommate of Mr. Mzoudi's, began serving his 15-year sentence on similar charges in February after the Hamburg court convicted him of 3,066 counts of accessory to murder, and of playing a crucial logistical role for the members of Al Qaeda who ultimately succeeded in ramming passenger planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and crashing an airliner in rural Pennsylvania.

Save 50% off home delivery of The Times



To: j-at-home who wrote (270373)12/11/2003 1:47:04 PM
From: Lucretius  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
f*ck him



To: j-at-home who wrote (270373)12/11/2003 1:50:00 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
uhhhhhh-12:30pm 12/11/03 GREENSPAN SAYS ELITES DESERVE BETTER LIVES THAN EVERYONE ELSE


rofl



To: j-at-home who wrote (270373)12/11/2003 3:18:09 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Respond to of 436258
 
<<12:30pm 12/11/03 GREENSPAN SAYS ELITES DESERVE BETTER LIVES THAN EVERYONE ELSE>>

LOL, we're not making up our own soundbites, just a little, are we?<G>