Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (2388)	12/11/2003 4:27:26 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

It depends on what the meaning of "yes" is. It depends on what the meaning of "danger" is. It depends on what the meaning of "threat" is. Or on what the meaning of "is" is. Or maybe it depends on what the meaning of "meaning" is. <g>

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (2388)	12/11/2003 6:39:19 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Kerry's vote was conditional, he said at the time. He said if Bush didn't go the UN route and invade only as a last resort he would hold his feet to the fire on it. He did. Kerry also urging patience to prep for the post-invasion Iraq. Would have been the smart thing to do obviously. Did Dean say Saddam was a danger? I don't know, but this race isn't over yet. I may have jumped the gun. There seems to be a backlash against the Gore endorsement. People don't like the election being decided before they can vote. It may actually hurt Dean, especially in Iowa and New Hampshire. It also makes people feel sorry for guys like Kerry and Lieberman and brings up the electability isue again. CNN reported today that Karl Rove loves the idea of running against Dean.