Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (2393)	12/11/2003 4:40:34 PM
From: mph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

that's why it amused me to see Dean's campaign manager suggest that when Dean said he never regarded Saddam as a danger, that he really meant an imminent danger....LOL

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (2393)	12/11/2003 4:52:56 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Thanks for digging that up, OMD. Pretty much reaffirms the silliness of the semantic debates among the dwarfs, doesn't it?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (2393)	12/11/2003 8:30:35 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

"How that got transformed into a claim that Bush lied about the imminency of the threat is one of the more fascinating mental disconnects of Bush's rabid opponents." Within hours of the SOTUA, The LA Times & Sen Kennedy falsely attributed Bush with claiming that Iraq was an "imminent threat". It just grew exponentially from there. It was used to claim Bush lied & misled everyone about going to war, etc. And no one who was part of this treachery has yet to admit how wrong they were about it.