Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob who wrote (56403)	12/11/2003 5:47:45 PM
From: Rande Is	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

Hi, Bob. Good to hear from you too. Thanks for the correction. However, I believe that its name alone is enough to float it in a basket of nanotechs. Remember the fuel cell rage? What was it EFTC? . . .they made batteries. They put out news saying they had no fuel cell products. Their stock continued to gain on the association. Next thing you know, the company announces they have a fuel cell for cell phones. LOL I guess you could say that they progressed technologically due to customer demand. . . .and you'd be right. Or you could say that perception is reality. And you would also be right. In one year, if NANO has nothing to do with nano technologies, I'll eat my sugar-frosted binary-coded nano-words. Rande Is