SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (19486)12/11/2003 6:19:57 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794497
 
Belmont Club Blog

The Dark Sword
Two different sources with synoptic views of the same event. The first, an article in the New Yorker by Seymour Hersh called Moving Targets asserts that the US is embarking on a manhunt strategy of targeted assassinations of enemy personnel, not just the top, but at the middle level of the Ba'ath structure. (Hat tip: a Belmont Club reader) Hersh casts his assertion in dark, foreboding terms, comparing it of course, to Operation Phoenix in Vietnam. But the key factual claim, which may contain a grain of truth is that an unconventional force consisting of American Special Forces and Iraqi intelligence agents is taking the field to crush the insurgency and perhaps do much else. That assertion has some collateral confirmation from the BBC, which asserts that top Iraqi intelligence officials from the new government are working hand-in-glove with the CIA at Langley to establish a new internal security service. Both articles are larded with conspiratorial suggestions. Hersh suggests that the manhunt approach is the evil product of Israeli intelligence and Lieutenant General William (Jerry) Boykin, while the BBC is emphasizing that possible recruitment may include ex-members of the Ba'ath secret service, who may not be so ex.

The two articles may not refer to the same thing; it is hard to think of Army operations like Task Force 121 being run out of Langley. So it is much more likely that the two are different parts of a larger picture. The BBC quotes the Washington Post as saying that the clandestine efforts, which probably contain both intelligence and operations components, are funded from classified items in the US budget. This is probably the first glimpse of the post-Operation Iraqi Freedom of the War on Terror.

The Belmont Club was at first horrified to learn that Saudi Arabia was eligible to subcontract for Iraqi reconstruction projects. But on further reflection, why not? The involvement of Jordan in training the new Iraqi internal security service in possible cooperation with Israel (if both the BBC and Hersh are to be believed), suggests that America is responding to radical Islamic infiltration of the West with some counter-infiltration of its own. And what better way to suborn the enemy but with a pot of gold that is the Iraqi reconstruction fund, ready to hand?
belmontclub.blogspot.com



To: LindyBill who wrote (19486)12/11/2003 9:31:48 PM
From: kumar  Respond to of 794497
 
Bill, its not that I dont get it. its that I dont understand the legality of it. You're right about "sore thumb" - I am 1 amongst 5 American families of Indian origin in my small town. Does not exempt me from any laws that other Americans have to follow. So, bottom line in my view is : Mr Ridge, deliver on what you were hired for, or esle step down. BTW "he inherited the problem" is a weak excuse - he was hired to fix it, and knew it when he took the job.