SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (19506)12/11/2003 8:11:08 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 793552
 
The Beat Goes On: Unemployment Drops
by William W. Beach, Alison Fraser and Rea S. Hederman Jr.
WebMemo #380
December 5, 2003 | printer-friendly format |

For the first time since March the unemployment rate is below 6 percent. Widespread evidence suggests this economic growth -- now at four consecutive months -- will continue throughout 2004 and probably 2005.

October’s job numbers were revised upwards to137, 000 from 126,000. While November’s initial reports of 57,000 new jobs will likely see a similar revision, the most significant news is that the unemployment rate has dropped below 6 percent, to 5.9 percent.

The latest job report also shows important gains in the area where no improvement has been seen before: Unemployment is down for African Americans, women and teenagers.

Other positive signs include:

Business investment has grown significantly in the last six months and at the especially brisk pace of 14 percent in the last three months. This means businesses are investing in new equipment and people.

Business activity is strong for both manufacturing and service sectors. Manufacturing activity is at its highest levels in 20 years and the service sector is soaring; which is significant because it accounts for 80 percent of the economy.

Business productivity growth soared at 9.4 percent in the Third Quarter – growth not seen in 20 years. (For more see Strong Economic Growth Continues by Rea S. Hederman, Jr.)

URL:http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/wm380.cfm



To: LindyBill who wrote (19506)12/11/2003 8:50:02 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793552
 
Marines Intend to Avoid Get-Tough Tactics in Iraq
By MICHAEL R. GORDON
December 11, 2003
DISPATCHES


CAMP PENDLETON, California, Dec. 10 -- No force has a tougher reputation than the United States Marines. But the marines who are headed to Iraq this spring say they intend to avoid the get-tough tactics that have been used in recent weeks by Army units.

Marine commanders say they not plan to surround villages with barbed wire, demolish buildings used by insurgents or detain relatives of suspected guerrillas. The Marines do not plan to fire artillery at suspected guerrilla mortar positions, an Army tactic that risks harming civilians. Nor do the Marines want to risk civilian casualties by calling in bombing strikes on the insurgents, as has happened most recently in Afghanistan.

"I do not envision using that tactic," said Lt. Gen. James T. Conway, the commanding general of the First Marine Expeditionary Force, who led the Marine force that fought its way to Baghdad and will command the more than 20,000 marines who will return to Iraq in March. "It would have to be a rare incident that transcends anything that we have seen in the country to make that happen."

The upsurge in guerrilla attacks on American troops in Iraq has prompted Army units in the Sunni Triangle in central Iraq to adopt a hard-nosed approach -- and spawned a behind-the-scenes debate within the American military about the best way to quash the insurgents.

While some Army commanders insist the hard-nosed tactics have been successful in reducing enemy attacks, other military officers believe they are alienating Iraqis and thus depriving American commanders of the public support and human intelligence needed to ferret out threats.

In an interview at his headquarters at Camp Pendleton, General Conway was careful not to criticize the Army. Still, he indicated that he plans to pursue a very different strategy.

"I don't want to condemn what people are doing," General Conway said. "I think they are doing what they think they have to do. I'll simply say that I think until we can win the population over and they can give us those indigenous intelligence reports that we're prolonging the process."

The Marines, General Conway says, will try to design their raids to be "laser precise," targeted on the enemy with a maximum effort made to avoid endangering or humiliating Iraqi civilians.

After American forces invaded Iraq last spring, United States marines fought some of the fiercest battles of the war at Nasiriya and at a mosque in eastern Baghdad. After Saddam Hussein was driven from power, the Marines assumed the responsibility for stabilizing south-central Iraq, where most of the inhabitants are Shiite Muslims who were persecuted under Mr. Hussein and were glad to see him gone. In contrast to the Army's experience, no marine was killed in action after mid-April.

The Marines insist their success also reflected their energetic efforts to work with the local population, an effort guided by their "small wars" manual, which derives from their 20th century interventions in Central America.

There were several parallels between the Marine experience in southern Iraq and how the Army's 101st Airborne has approached northern Iraq -- and many differences from the aggressive tactics of the Army's Fourth Infantry Division and other Army units in the Sunni Triangle.

On their return to Iraq now, the Marines will be dealing with a much more challenging area which includes restive towns like Falluja, west of Baghdad.

In that region, American military units have come and gone so often that they have had little time to understand their surroundings. Falluja was initially occupied by the 82nd Airborne Division, which was soon replaced by the Third Armored Cavalry Regiment, which was in turn replaced by the Second Brigade of the Army's Third Infantry Division. In early summer, the Third Infantry Division had some success in helping to establish the local police. But it returned to the United States, handing the town back to the Third Armored Cavalry, which was soon replaced by the 82nd Airborne.

In Iraqi society, which emphasizes personal relationships, the constant rotations have made a difficult job that much harder. So have some tactics: in April, soldiers from the 82nd Airborne based themselves in Falluja and were fired on during an anti-American demonstration. The troops fired back. Iraqis say 17 people were killed and more than 70 wounded, many of them civilians who never fired on the American troops. The 82nd Airborne has disputed that account.

Starting next March, nine battalions of Marines will be deployed. In addition to infantry, the Marine force will include light armored reconnaissance units, engineers and Cobra attack helicopters. The Marines will also take command of a brigade from the Army's First Infantry Division, which is also deploying in the spring.

Success, Marine commanders say, will ultimately depend winning the trust of a wary Iraqi population. The measure of progress, General Conway says, will not be the number of American raids or enemy dead. It will be tips about potential threats that are provided to the Marines by ordinary Iraqis.

"The program we used in the south was a maturing Iraqi police, supported by an Army M.P.

company in each of the cities, supported by a Marine quick reaction force," he said, defining this as a Marine infantry battalion. "That worked very well for us. That is the model we intend to use."

Toward this end, the marines are planning to work with the Iraqi police and also train and equip an Iraqi military force to take on the insurgents. "We intend to create an Iraqi Marine battalion, maybe a brigade," General Conway said.

Marine commanders have stressed the need to be sensitive to local traditions. Marines here have been told to remove their sunglasses and look Iraqis in the eye when they speak with them. A select group of marines also been selected for intensive Arabic language training. The marines will use Iraqi, not American names, to delineate the zones assigned to specific Marine units and will try to align them with Iraqi administrative districts. To limit the disruption to the local populations, the Marines also plan to set up their bases outside of Iraqi cities.

But the marines at Camp Pendleton are also prepared to fight, if necessary.

"We carry an embedded offensive capability in every convoy," said Maj. Gen. James N. Mattis, the commander of the First Marine Division. "To us you don't drive on through, you stop, you hunt them down and you nail them."

"We will try to go and restore a degree of civility," said General Mattis. "If they choose to fight they are going to regret it, but we also believe that part of the physicians' oath that says first do no harm. If to kill a terrorist we have got to kill eight innocent people you don't kill them."

General Conway added: "We will be as vicious with the resistance as we have to be. It is not that we intend to go in and coddle everyone. Our Marines just have to be able to be aggressive and hostile one moment and the next moment be able to play soccer with the kids."

General Conway says, for instance, that if the marines fire artillery shells, they will be special illumination rounds to light up terrain, not destroy targets. On Nov. 25, Army units near Tikrit responded to fire from an enemy mortar only to discover that the mortar rounds came from a site near a residential area; the Army later announced it had begun an investigation into reports that civilians were injured by the Army's artillery fire.

"Right now, in some of the sectors they are firing artillery missions against radar hits," General Conway said. "That will not be our method of operation."
nytimes.com



To: LindyBill who wrote (19506)12/12/2003 3:37:34 PM
From: MSI  Respond to of 793552
 
That's pretty ho-hum, since a large number thinks there's legalized graft going on in the billions, already. The only question is whether jellyfish Dems have the will to push it.

So far, they don't. Only Dean or Gore have the moxie, imo, or maybe Nader, but no one's listening to him.

Meanwhile a recent Money mag poll shows skepticism across the board among what they term the 'investor class' -- I can't find the link but it just came over the reuters wire.