Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Biotech Stock Picking - 2003 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (317)	12/12/2003 11:06:12 AM
From: nigel bates	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 383

You missed out the bit about disqualifying all those domiciled in the US... ... and I'm sure there are a few more essential criteria (i'm just working on them now).

To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (317)	12/12/2003 11:43:44 AM
From: tuck	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 383

>>Michael just called (his computer is down... he asked me to pass on the news) and said that there has been an adjustment to the 2003 rules. The concept is to pick a portfolio where all of the stocks end up green, and where one company is munched during the year.<< To paraphrase the mantra of the realty business: ALLOCATION, ALLOCATION, ALLOCATION! >>I also made the suggestion that anyone with a portfolio of plus 200% or better should be disqualified, as they must be cheating.<< Folks who feel this way are invited to check my arithmetic in accounting for the OGSI munch and RIGL reverse split. Message 18930545 Message 19239225 Message 19154606 As for place of domicile . . . don't let my profile fool you, I'm just a wannabe: I really live in a cardboard hovel in Tijuana. Why do you think my charity is for homeless people? I need the money! Cheers, Tuck