Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuvo Research Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wilyolvet who wrote (13194)	12/12/2003 8:15:06 PM
From: axial	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14101

Based on information addressed to me - not other people - I have no confidence that there's any honest purpose served by a discussion with you. It will only serve to legitimize the interests you have represented, and who echo your views in public forums. They too have perpetuated the anti-RK hatchet job on public boards - especially since you were all cut out of an attempt to scoop some Oxo Chemie, after Dimethaid investors had poured tens of millions of dollars into the company. This fact was unknown to investors, until recently - and never disclosed. The "cover story" is that you would have mitigated the damage that RK was doing by depriving Oxo Chemie of funds. Others have taken that up with joy, linking RK to crimes against humanity, by impeding the progress of WF10. This spectacular inversion of the truth has fooled nobody. The facts support the conclusion that the undisclosed intention was to gain a piece of the action - and that subsequent attacks on RK are retribution for her protection of our investment in Oxo Chemie. We can only judge these would-be saviours of humanity and Oxo Chemie by their posts. They inspire no confidence that Dimethaid, Oxo Chemie, or the welfare of mankind would have been improved by their presence as major players. Quite the opposite. The proponents of savage and factually incorrect attacks on RK's leadership now want to "discuss" matters? I think not. I suggest you and your newly-revealed postmates stick to what you do best: manufacturing indignation about nonexistent realities, for public consumption. Thank you. Jim