Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (43136)	12/12/2003 2:43:12 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Respond to of 74559

Hi pezz, I now understand what you meant when you said ( with regards to LUM ) you were peeing in your pants. Some help, and some savings for your pockets as well... depend.com KJC Full Disclosure: I have no positions in Kimberly-Clark. Generally speaking now, since I have no stocks that are up 165% in one day, I have no need for the products either... Unless the markets could probably drop by 165% in one day, in which case I'd need the entire product line... <g>

To: pezz who wrote (43136)	12/12/2003 4:30:56 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Hello Pezz, Report: ISEC, whatever they do or pretend to do, is good stuff ;0) I woke up tonight, without prompting, and: (a) purchased a tranche of Fording Canadian Coal Trust uk.finance.yahoo.com at CAD 39.69/shr and lower; (b) shorted a dollop of Peabody Energy uk.finance.yahoo.com March Put strike 40 at USD 2.60/shr. I did not buy the shares because I want to see if I can simply extract distributions without the company declaring dividends, and realize value without strong commitment. These zigs/zags will not cause me to wet my pants, but do allow me to turn soon to be worthless cash into matters of value. Chugs, Jay