Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (2617)	12/12/2003 5:50:08 PM
From: MrLucky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Bush said the Pentagon put the issue "right out there on the table for everybody to see and they're doing good work. We're going to make sure that as we spend money in Iraq, that it's spent well, it's spent wisely. "Their investigation will lay the facts out for everybody to see," Bush said. "The Bushie way", taken from your beloved CNN who always reports the news perfectly correct. Read it and weep.

To: American Spirit who wrote (2617)	12/13/2003 5:15:06 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 90947

Bush Tells Halliburton to Pay Back Overcharges Friday, December 12, 2003 WASHINGTON — <font size=4>President Bush, trying to calm a political storm, said Friday that Vice President Dick Cheney's former company should repay the government if it overcharged for gasoline delivered in Iraq under a controversial prewar contract. "If there's an overcharge, like we think there is, we expect that money be repaid," the president told reporters when asked about the Halliburton contract controversy. <font size=3> Pentagon auditors say the company charged up to $61 million too much for delivering gasoline to Iraqi citizens under a no-bid contract to rebuild Iraq's dilapidated oil industry. Halliburton denies overcharging. Meanwhile, an Army spokesman disclosed that companies from France, Germany, Russia and Canada won't be eligible to replace Halliburton as the recipient of the oil reconstruction contract. The Army Corps of Engineers is reviewing bids and hopes to decide this month who will get the oil reconstruction deals worth up to $800 million in northern Iraq and $1.2 billion in the south. The decision means an additional $2 billion in contracts in Iraq — not disclosed before — would be forbidden to countries that opposed the war, along with the $18.6 billion in Iraq work the Bush administration declared off limits earlier this week. The countries that have been left out see the rules as payback, but Bush says limiting contracts to countries that sent troops and money to Iraq makes sense and will encourage more nations to join the U.S.-led coalition. Democrats have joined the fray, saying Bush is needlessly alienating allies and rewarding political supporters. Cheney headed Halliburton from 1995 until he became Bush's running mate in 2000, and other executives from the company gave generously to the Bush campaign. "George W. Bush is preventing entire nations from bidding on contracts in Iraq so his campaign contributors can continue to overcharge the American taxpayers," Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean said while campaigning in Iowa Friday. The political impact is still unclear. As long ago as last May, in a CBS-New York Times poll, about half the respondents said they thought the Bush administration gave contracts to companies because they had close GOP ties. <font size=4> Pentagon officials say they gave Halliburton the prewar oil reconstruction contract because it was essential to start rebuilding quickly after the U.S.-led invasion. Halliburton already had a competitively bid contract to provide short-notice logistical help for the Army. <font size=3> Separately under that contract, Halliburton has been paid about $3 billion for supporting the military with cafeterias, mail delivery and other services. The oil contract, which started as a relatively small order for fighting oil well fires, has grown into the largest reconstruction contract in Iraq. Halliburton has gotten more than $2.2 billion so far on that contract — $989 million from U.S. taxpayers, $1.3 billion from the United Nations' oil for food program and $90 million from seized Iraqi assets. Together, the 11 other Iraq reconstruction projects awarded to other companies have paid out $1.7 billion. The largest, to construction giant Bechtel for rebuilding infrastructure such as highways and bridges, has delivered more than $1 billion so far. The largest part of Halliburton's oil reconstruction contract is providing gasoline and other fuel to Iraqis while the country's oil industry is rebuilt. A Pentagon audit found Halliburton was charging $1.09 more per gallon for gasoline it trucked into Iraq from Kuwait than for the same fuel it imported from Turkey. <font size=4> Pentagon officials said Thursday Halliburton's Kuwaiti subcontractor apparently charged too much for the gasoline. Halliburton's president, Dave Lesar, said the Kuwaiti firm was the only one that met the contract's requirements. Lesar said Halliburton earned "a few cents on the dollar" for delivering the fuel. Under the contract, Halliburton gets a guaranteed profit calculated as part of the company's costs. In other words, the higher the costs, the more money Halliburton gets. Halliburton is guaranteed a profit equal to at least two percent of its costs. Depending on performance, Halliburton can earn a profit of up to 7 percent of costs. If the subcontractor did overcharge by $61 million, Halliburton would be guaranteed $1.2 million in profit from that amount. If Halliburton earned the entire 7 percent, its profit on the overcharge would be about $4.3 million. The Army Corps of Engineers currently is reviewing bids for the $2 billion in contracts that will replace Halliburton's no-bid award. At least 69 companies — including Halliburton — were sent solicitations, according to a Corps Web site. <font size=3> Those companies included ones based in Canada, India, Great Britain, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman and Saudi Arabia. Bids from Canadian and Indian companies would be barred under the Bush administration's restrictions. foxnews.com

To: American Spirit who wrote (2617)	12/13/2003 5:16:47 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 90947

<font size=4>......And, in an apparently unrelated story, Haliburton has allegedly been overcharging for gasoline transported from Kuwait to Iraq. We'd like to use these as a platform for launching EconoPundit's new theorem, which is also so obvious it fits the old, <font size=5> "the last thing a fish would discover is water" model. <font size=4> EconoPundit Theorem #14q: COMPARED WITH THEIR REPUBLICAN COUNTERPARTS SUPPORTERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ARE EXTREMELY EMOTIONAL ABOUT VIRTUALLY EVERYTHING. There's upcoming confirmation in two ways. First, EconoPundit predicts Democrats will get so worked up about gas overcharging -- some claiming it's the central issue of the decade -- they'll go into deep depressive retreat when they realize such allegations and subsequent adjustments are all perfectly normal in war zone situations. <font size=3> Second, when Baker and Bush compromise on the war contracts, Republican supporters (many of whom are kinda worked up right now) will pretty much shrug everything off as normal. No depressive tailspin here. <font size=4> The difference is easy to explain. To Republicans, politics and markets always work to mediate between differing definitions of "perfection." To them, compromise between individuals and interest groups is part of the normal way of things. But to Democrats -- those heroic descendants of Jean Jacques Rousseau -- perfection is right out there, real, always to be fought for with (remember JFK?) vigor! Compromise? That's for Republicans -- you know, the ones who don't have real values! <font size=3> econopundit.com