Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (15448)	12/13/2003 9:32:53 AM
From: Wyätt Gwyön	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

I've read the peak oil argument and it's fundamentally flawed in it's conclusions. that is a meaningless statement unless you back it up with reasoning. it's bad writing style to simply say "it's fundamentally flawed in it's [sic] conclusions", without stating WHY. if you had written this in a newspaper article draft, a decent editor would have torn it to shreds. if you want to have a proper debate, you must debate properly. since there are countless career petroleum geologists behind the peak oil argument, i trust you are highly qualified to assess the "fundamental flaws" of their argument. Oil production matches consumption congratulations for noticing the obvious. the issue is the price at which they match. btw, relying on BP for oil statistics to back up your complacency argument is like relying on the White House Press Secretary to tell the whole story about George Bush. this is my last comment on our little discussion here. feel free to have the last word, but remember: no cat ever came down when a dog barked up the wrong tree. barking louder will only make you hoarse.