Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter O'Brien who wrote (508973)	12/13/2003 6:56:09 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

nope. You can't prove that FDR spent more money than Bush in a 3 year period on primarily pork is what it seems like to me. So let me help you with your argument. Growth of socialism, % of total outlays spent on human resources sentryoveramerica.com GWB and FDR--Sad Differences This may disappoint many uneducated Republicans, but Ronald Reagan and FDR were very similar. Both slashed social spending and both increased military spending. And, they both dedicated the resources of the United States to win a war. Reagan's cut in social spending and his "peace through strength" military increases, played a major role in winning the Cold War. George Bush has increased domestic socialism by a sickening degree and has become the biggest global welfare spender—ever. Our loss of lives in Iraq, and our failure to find bin Laden and Hussein, is directly correlated with Bush's global welfare spending spree and his failure to increase money spent on our military. Unlike FDR, Bush talks like the war on terror is his main priority, but his social spending agenda and his failure to fund our military and use it to protect our borders differs greatly from FDR. sentryoveramerica.com