SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AK2004 who wrote (509034)12/13/2003 10:47:58 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
A proper study wouldn't link NAMES to the IQ's, only party affiliation. My IQ is none of your business.



To: AK2004 who wrote (509034)12/13/2003 11:56:27 PM
From: Rick McDougall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
August/September 1997, pg. 97

Middle East History: It Happened in September

U.S. Grants Israel Strategic Partnership and Then Pays For It

By Donald Neff

It was 16 years ago, on Sept. 10, 1981, that the Reagan administration conferred an extraordinary privilege on Israel. It formally announced that the tiny nation of well under four million Jews and the mighty United States had a "strategic relationship."1 On Nov. 30, the United States made the compact official by signing a Memorandum of Understanding on Strategic Cooperation with Israel.2

The rationale for the unique relationship was that Israel would cooperate to counter threats in the Middle East "caused by the Soviet Union or Soviet-controlled forces from outside the region." Since Israel had shown a decade earlier that it could not stand up to Soviet air power in Egypt during the war of attrition, this was not exactly a major gain for the United States.3 But it had great benefits for Israel.

The agreement brought the Jewish state a large array of new claims to U.S. assets and technology and diplomatic prestige. The memorandum created a coordinating council and working groups on weaponry research, military cooperation, maintenance facilities and other areas of so-called "mutual interest," in effect giving Israel American expertise at the working level. In addition, the United States agreed to buy up to $200 million a year of Israeli military products, thus opening the lucrative U.S. arms market to Israel. The irony was that Israel had founded its industry on U.S. technology transferred to Israel as aid or purloined by Israeli spies.4

Not surprisingly, the pact angered Arabs, who charged the United States was directly helping Israeli "aggression and expansionism."5 The Arabs were particularly disturbed by the timing of the announcement. It came barely a month after Crown Prince Fahd bin Abdul Aziz put forward the first comprehensive peace plan ever offered by Saudi Arabia.6

The U.N. General Assembly also criticized the agreement, saying it would "encourage Israel to pursue its aggressive and expansionist policies and practices in the occupied territories" and would have "adverse effects on efforts for the establishment of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East and would threaten the security of the region."7

Despite the enormous prestige and profit the United States had conferred on Israel by adopting it as a strategic partner, Israel then turned around and caused tremendous embarrassment to Washington two weeks later by annexing Syria's Golan Heights.8 Israel's action on Dec. 14 directly defied U.S. policy and came at considerable cost to itself. In a rare show of anger at Israel, the Reagan administration joined in a unanimous U.N. Security Council resolution condemning the annexation and calling it "null and void."9 More dramatically, on Dec. 18 Washington unilaterally suspended the Memorandum of Understanding on Strategic Cooperation.

Israel had shown a decade earlier it could not stand up to Soviet air power.

With that action, there also were suspended a series of special privileges enjoyed by Israel. These included halting technical advice to Israeli concerns seeking to sell military equipment to the United States, barring Israel's use of U.S. aid to buy supplies from Israeli rather than American firms, and rescinding permission for third countries to use U.S. aid to buy military equipment from Israeli firms.10

Washington also had strong words for Israel. A State Department spokesman said: "We do not recognize Israel's action, which we consider to be without international legal effect. Their action is inconsistent with both the letter and the spirit of U.N. Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338."11

Prime Minister Menachem Begin reacted to the U.S. actions with outrage and arrogance. He summoned U.S. Ambassador to Israel Samuel W. Lewis to his Jerusalem home and declared:

"You have no moral right to preach to us about civilian casualties. We have read the history of World War II and we know what happened to civilians when you took action against an enemy. We have also read the history of the Vietnam War and your phrase 'bodycount'....Are we a vassal state? A banana republic? Are we 14-year-old boys, that if they don't behave they have their knuckles smacked?...The people of Israel has lived for 3,700 years without a memorandum of understanding with America and it will continue to live without it for another 3,700 years."12

The ironies of the scene were many, not the least of which was that Begin himself was a notorious schemer more than willing to break agreements and that Lewis was one of America's most pro-Israel ambassadors.13

As a result of such harsh words and emotions, the strategic relationship remained suspended as long as Begin was in power. He finally resigned on Sept. 15, 1983, and on Oct. 10 he was succeeded by Yitzhak Shamir. Nineteen days later Washington resurrected the memorandum of understanding with the signing by President Reagan of top-secret National Security Decision Directive 111. It called for strategic cooperation with Israel against Soviet moves in the region. The policy was opposed by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger and the CIA, but it had the strong backing of Secretary of State George Shultz, one of America's most pro-Israel secretaries ever.14

Aid and Access

In return for its cooperation, Israel was given more aid and intimate access to American national security officials and technology. The United States and Israel established a Joint Military Political Group (JMPG) for strategic cooperation. Funding was provided for Israel's Lavi fighter, joint military exercises were scheduled, stockpiling of U.S. military equipment in Israel was authorized, more extensive sharing of intelligence was agreed to, use of Israeli ports to service ships of the U.S. Sixth Fleet was approved, and a unique free trade zone which would give Israel duty-free access to U.S. markets was established.

It was a long and tortuous path from the original strategic partnership and its final confirmation. Among the twists and turns: In 1982, Israel, armed with U.S. weapons, committed another outrage by invading Lebanon, causing untold death and destruction. Other horrors followed the massacre at Sabra and Shatila and the bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut with the loss of 63 lives, including one of the CIA's top officials. Israel's refusal to withdraw caused the dispatch of U.S. Marines to Lebanon, where less than a week before the strategic partnership was finalized 241 servicemen were killed by an explosives-laden truck that penetrated the Marine barracks at Beirut airport, one of the worst losses in the corps' history.17

Although Reagan vowed that the Marines would remain, they were withdrawn early the next year. But that did not stop attacks against Americans. On Sept. 20, 1984, further evidence of American vulnerability was provided by the bombing of the American Embassy's new location in East Beirut, with the loss of 24 employees, most of them not Americans. That same year saw the start of long-term kidnappings of Americans by Iranian-funded Lebanese Muslim groups. Anti-Americanism became so bad that in 1985 Washington imposed a travel ban on Americans going to Lebanon, declaring it was too dangerous. By the end of 1988, the American presence in Lebanon was essentially finished except for a handful of embassy personnel, who kept a very low profile.18

While the strategic partnership could not be directly blamed for causing one of America's biggest setbacks in the Middle East U.S. expulsion from Lebanon after having had a major presence there since 1866 it certainly did nothing to prevent it. If anything, the open association with Israel as a "partner" further encouraged Israel's enemies to become America's enemies. The only benefactor of the strategic relationship was Israel. It gained the stature of being a partner of America as well as the profits of additional aid and cooperation that allowed it to continue its occupation of Arab lands in defiance of the rest of the world.



To: AK2004 who wrote (509034)12/13/2003 11:59:21 PM
From: Rick McDougall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT IS THE LARGEST RECIPIENT OF US AID IN THE WORLD.

Palestine Fact Sheets

Whether a student, community activist, politician or an average citizen, these fact sheets will provide you with concise information on the different issues related to the current Intifada and Palestine. Feel free to print and distribute them as long as they are accredited to the Palestine Monitor.

United States Aid to Israel: Funding the Occupation

Israel is a funded state. Despite its own relatively healthy economy, it continues to receive aid from the US, in disproportion to both the country’s population and needs.

The financial aid alone that Israel receives from the US allows it to purchase tanks, helicopter gunships, F-16 war planes, machine guns and bullets – all of which it uses to commit human rights violations against the Palestinian people on a daily basis. When it is not possible for the Israeli government to use the funds directly on military expenditure, their use elsewhere frees up other Israeli government funds to pay for military salaries, services and facilities.

Military power is required for Israel to maintain its occupation of the Palestinian territories, implemented through a system of expanding settlements, checkpoints and closure. It is therefore no exaggeration to say that the US is funding and supplying the Israeli government’s occupation of the Palestinian territories, as without financial subsidies from the US, the Israeli government would have found it considerably more difficult to sustain its military occupation of the Palestinian territories for the past thirty-four years.

Snapshot of the state of Israel

Israel’s population is 6 million people, including:

› 182,000 illegal settlers in the West Bank
› 20,000 illegal settlers in the occupied Golan Heights
› 7,000 illegal settlers in the Gaza Strip
› 176,000 illegal settlers in East Jerusalem1

Israel ranks as the 16th wealthiest country in the world, and Israelis enjoy a per capita income higher than Ireland, Spain, or oil-rich Saudi Arabia.2

Israel’s GNP is higher than the combined GNP of Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and the Occupied Palestinian Territories.3

Since 28 September 2000, Israeli police, soldiers and settlers have killed more than 2,050 Palestinians -- the vast majority of them civilians -- in contravention of international law.

A BREAKDOWN OF UNITED STATES AID TO ISRAEL

Financial Aid

The Israeli government is the largest recipient of US financial aid in the world, receiving over one-third of total US aid to foreign countries4, even though Israel’s population comprises just .001% of the world’s population and has one the world’s higher per capita incomes.

Since 1949 the US has given Israel a total of $84,854,827,200. The interest costs born by US taxpayers on behalf of Israel are $49,937,000,000 – making the total amount of aid given to Israel since 1949 $134,791,507,200 (more than $134 billion).5

The total cost of this financial aid to US tax payers per Israeli is $23,240.

Since 1992, the US has offered Israel an additional $2 billion in loan guarantees every year.6

Nearly all past loans to Israel have been forgiven – leading Israel to claim that they have never defaulted on repayment of a US loan – with most loans made on the understanding that they would be forgiven before Israel was required to repay them.

In 1997 alone, the total of US grants and loan guarantees to Israel was $5.5 billion, i.e., $15,068,493 per day.

Military Aid

The United States provides direct and indirect military aid to Israel – totalling more than it gives to all the countries of sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean put together, whose combined total population is 1,054,000,000.

According to a US Department of Defence Joint Report to Congress in March 2001, “It is in the United States’ national interest to promote the existence of a stable, democratic and militarily strong Israel, at peace with its neighbours […]”.7 According to a US State Department statement in November 2002, the US government is committed to “maintaining and enhancing Israel’s security and qualitative edge over any combination of adversaries” and “the important advantages the US-Israeli strategic relationship has and will continue to provide us.”8

Foreign Military Financing (FMF) is grants to foreign governments financing the purchase of American-made weapons, services and training. Israel receives 50% of the FMF budget request. The large sums paid by the US to Egypt and Jordan are in recognition of the two countries signing peace accords with Israel in 1979 and 1994 respectively.

FMF Budget Request FY 2001: Total budget request: $3.54 billion
Budget request for Israel: $1.98 billion
Budget request for Egypt: $1.3 billion
Budget request for Jordan $75 million

The Economic Support Fund (ESF) promotes economic and political stability in areas strategically important to the US. It is not intended for military usage, but allows the recipient government to free up other money, therefore providing indirect military aid. Israel receives the largest single grant of the Near East budget, which alone is 79% of the total ESF request.

ESF Budget Request, FY 2001:
Total budget request:
$2.313 billion


Budget request for Near East:
$1.828 billion, including:


Israel
$840 million


Egypt
$150 million


WB/GS
$100 million


Furthermore:

18 of the 92 pending arms sales transfers in the year 2000 were to Israel;

Israel has the world’s largest fleet of F-16s outside the US, currently possessing 200 jets -- with a further 102 on order with American manufacturer Lockheed Martin;

In June 2001 Israel again requested $800 million in supplementary US aid. This was originally pledged to cover the cost of the Israeli withdrawal from south Lebanon – in other words, Israel was being paid for complying with international law. As Israel re-requests this package, administration officials have considered linking it to the implementation of the Mitchell Report, again effectively paying Israel to comply with international standards;9

Charitable Aid

Private donations to American charities initially constituted one quarter of Israel’s budget. Today, it is estimated that these tax-deductible donations exceed $1.5 billion per year. The ability of Americans to make what amounts to tax deductible contributions to a foreign government does not exist for any other country.

US aid to Israel: A violation of US law

US law prohibits the President from providing military aid to any country that “engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognised human rights”.10 Under the 1967 US Arms Export Control Act, it is illegal to use US weapons to carry out extra-judicial killings. This act stipulates that weapons be sold to “friendly countries solely for internal security and legitimate defence.”

Since September 2000, the Israeli army has used attack helicopters, tanks and F-16 missiles to target Palestinian civilians, homes, forces, buildings and in demonstrations. In its Human Rights Report, the US State Department declared that Israeli army actions were an “excessive use of force”, noting that the Israeli forces used live ammunition, even when they were not in imminent danger, and that the Israeli military “shelled PA institutions and Palestinian civilian areas in response to individual Palestinian attacks on Israeli civilians or settlers”.

The Israeli government’s policies in the occupied Palestinian territories have been condemned by human rights organisations worldwide. The Israeli army’s “excessive use of force” towards Palestinian civilians and its policy of “state assassinations” violate international human rights law. In supplying military aid to such a state, the US is violating its own laws.