Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elsewhere who wrote (19838)	12/14/2003 2:10:57 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793711

From the desk of Jane Galt: How much intelligence is Saddaam good for? The news is now talking about what sorts of inromation they're hoping to get out of Saddaam, starting with the location of the WMD. People are talking about the difficulty of interrogating him, given how high-profile he is. But it seems to me that there's a problem which is potentially even bigger: does Saddaam have any useful information? In his new book, Bob Rubin discusses the problem of the CEO -- that even a CEO who is receptive to disagreement or disagreeable information will find people agreeing with them, or "softening" bad news, because they are awestruck or merely ambitious. Brutal tyrants have this problem in spades: people don't tell you things you don't want to hear, because you tend to shoot them. This phenomenon explains a lot of Hitler's behaviour during World War II -- as I recall, by the end of the war, Hitler spent much of his time ordering phantom divisions, long since destroyed, around Europe. This may well also be the explanation for a lot of Saddaam's behavior leading up to the war. As a coworker pointed out, there's an enormous "What the F***?" factor to his actions. It's simply lunatic that he could have thought he would defeat us, and if he didn't have WMD, why not let the inspectors in? The most interesting explanation I've heard is that he thought he did have WMD -- that subordinates, fearful of his wrath, had been giving him regular reports about a phantom weapons program he didn't want the UN to discover. It's certainly fascinating to consider that all those games the Iraqis played with the weapons inspectors pre-1998 might have been aimed less at fooling the UN than at preventing their boss from discovering that they hadn't succeeded in fabricating anthrax after all. janegalt.net

To: Elsewhere who wrote (19838)	12/14/2003 2:13:15 PM
From: gamesmistress	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793711

German Defence Minister Peter Struck and Senator Ted Kennedy are currently vying for the "Wish I'd Waited 24 Hours Before I Said That" award. :-)