SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JJL (Hijacked) who wrote (509921)12/15/2003 1:28:47 AM
From: 10K a day  Respond to of 769667
 
it wasn't a war...it was an 'occupation'...as in employment.



To: JJL (Hijacked) who wrote (509921)12/15/2003 1:30:30 AM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
re: First you have a violation of a treaty, yet no WMDs were ever found

That is completely irrelevant - the burden of proof or providing information was Saddam and if he violated the treaty regarding WMD then he violated the treaty.



To: JJL (Hijacked) who wrote (509921)12/15/2003 1:31:05 AM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
I've been asking that same question for months on this board. The wingnuts don't understand anything but hail das Fuherer.

Orca



To: JJL (Hijacked) who wrote (509921)12/15/2003 1:47:44 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
The WMD's are (and were, on the eve of war) established fact. The disposition of them of the only question.

The left continues to lie about WMD's "not being there", assisted by their dying "establishment" media lap dog.

Is it any wonder 80% of the American people are just waiting for the day in 2004 to move them OUT?...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News