Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (2804)	12/15/2003 3:51:58 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Respond to of 90947

I was all for making sure Saddam was a limited threat. Just like Kerry was all for making Saddam a limited threat in 1991 by asking him nicely to pretty please give Kuwait back but not allowing the use of force? I think the visual message Saddam's picture sends to others who aspire to being dictators is worthwhile.

To: American Spirit who wrote (2804)	12/15/2003 4:10:18 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Gephardt gets it. Why doesn't John F@#$%^& Kerry? "I supported this effort in Iraq without regard for the political consequences because it was the right thing to do. I still feel that way now, and today is a major step toward stabilizing Iraq and building a new democracy." REP. DICK GEPHARDT (D-Mo.) on the capture of Saddam Hussein