SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (7657)12/16/2003 1:13:03 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 10965
 
Jewish Times: Controversy erupts over e-mails as Dean blames Rove for online attacks

jta.org

[[RGD: Is Bush's Brain, Karl Rove, dirty, scurrilous, immoral, unethical and slimy enough to pull this trick? Damn tootin' he is! Slime season has arrived! Watch you footing..... ]]

********
WASHINGTON, Dec. 15 (JTA) — Howard Dean is smarting from e-mails that distort his views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and he has suggested that President Bush’s right-hand man is behind the e-mail campaign.
Speaking Monday to the Pacific Council on International Policy, a leadership forum in Los Angeles, Dean said he believed Karl Rove, the White House’s senior political adviser, is behind an e-mail campaign that has flooded inboxes of American Jews across the country.

The White House referred calls about Rove’s alleged involvement in the e-mail campaign to the Bush/Cheney re-election campaign. Scott Stanzel, a campaign spokesman, said the campaign does not respond to comments by the Democratic contenders.

The message in the e-mails is that Dean wants an “even-handed” policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Many Jews consider that a way of saying that the United States should be less supportive of Israel.

“I’ve discovered that ‘even-handedly’ is a code word to certain people who think that is being unfair, and I don’t want to ever repeat that word again,” Dean said after his speech, in which he outlined his vision for foreign affairs and national security. “It is now making its way around the Internet in an unsigned piece of literature, undoubtedly from one of my worthy opponents, perhaps Karl Rove.”

The campaign later said Dean made the comments in a light-hearted exchange with a questioner, who wanted to know how he would deal more even-handedly with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Matthew Dorf, Dean’s liaison to the Jewish community, noted that the audience broke into laughter after Dean said it. However, Dorf reiterated Dean’s comment that the e-mails are politically motivated.

“It’s clearly the work of political opponents and not true friends of Israel,” he said.

The e-mails, which have been widely circulated in the past few weeks, highlight comments Dean made in September, when he said it was not in America’s interest to “take sides” in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“Howard Dean promised that if he is elected president, the United States will no longer support Israel the way it has in the past under both Democratic and Republican presidents,” one of the e-mails says. “In his own words, he will insist that the United States be ‘even handed.’ ”

The e-mail also makes reference to other Dean comments and says, “I urge you that if you have any love for America and Israel you should not and cannot vote for Howard Dean for the office of president.”

Dean has since spent a great deal of time and energy clarifying his views. He has said that he meant that Bush, by downgrading U.S. involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict early on in his administration, had abandoned the role of honest broker.

Dean also has emphasized his support for Israel. He said in his speech Monday that he believed the U.S. alliance with Israel “will always be and must remain unshakeable, and so will be my commitment, every day of my administration, to work with the parties for a solution that ends decades of blood and tears.”

Other Democratic candidates have chastised Dean for being insensitive, at the very least, for using a term like “taking sides.”

Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.), who has been heavily courting the American Jewish community for support, has been especially critical.

The Internet campaign against Dean has made waves in the American Jewish community, and it remains unclear how prominently the e-mails and Dean’s initial comments about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will affect Jewish support for the former Vermont governor.

On its Web site, the Anti-Defamation League called the e-mail campaign against Dean “malicious, misleading and factually inaccurate.”

“In response to concerns about his September speech, Gov. Dean has assured the Anti-Defamation League and other Jewish organizations of his support for the State of Israel and his belief in the importance of strong U.S.-Israeli relations,” the Web site reads. It includes a letter to Dean from the ADL’s national director, Abraham Foxman, and Dean’s reply.

The Dean campaign says it has been responding aggressively to the e-mail campaign. People who contact Dean about the e-mails receive an e-mail from Dorf providing information on Dean’s positions on Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The jab at Rove was not the first time Dean has put out unsubstantiated rumor and then insisted he was speaking facetiously.

Earlier this month, Dean suggested that the Bush administration had advance notice from Saudi Arabia of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Conspiracy charges against Rove play well to Dean’s base in the Democratic Party, which regards Rove as unscrupulous.

Matthew Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, said the charge against Rove was ridiculous and that he was sure the e-mail was not coming from Republicans.

“If it makes Howard Dean feel better to blame others for holding him accountable to his own on-the-record statement and views, then so be it,” Brooks said. “However, to blame the Bush campaign, and specifically Karl Rove, is both untrue and unfair.” [[RGD: The bastards never stop lying! :) ]]



To: American Spirit who wrote (7657)12/16/2003 1:17:43 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
After Losing Momentum, Kerry Is Shifting Tactics to Gain 'Bounce' in Iowa

nytimes.com

December 16, 2003

THE MASSACHUSETTS SENATOR

By DAVID M. HALBFINGER

DES MOINES, Dec. 15 — It has come to this, for Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts: to win the Jan. 27 Democratic primary in New Hampshire, where he was once seen as the heavy favorite, his aides now believe he will first have to win or come close in Iowa, defying expectations and gaining the kind of favorable publicity his campaign has sorely wanted for months.

After weeks of tough headlines and even worse poll numbers, Mr. Kerry, to the relief of some aides, is finally acting and sounding like an underdog, and less like someone who felt he was being robbed of what was rightfully his.

Indeed, Mr. Kerry has been fighting "for every vote" — as he often puts it — during a four-day swing through southeastern and central Iowa. On Saturday night in Davenport, he talked briefly before taking questions for an hour and 45 minutes, quite possibly a personal record. Several times he apologized to his audience for "fouling up" their dinner or movie dates and thanked them for braving the ice and snow.

It was a rare performance for Mr. Kerry, who usually bows to the handlers who try to hustle him off after 30 minutes or an hour of questions at most. And he appeared to have won at least a few new votes. "I just like his straightforwardness," said Tom Kelly, 61, a steelworker who said he had never been to a political event before. Mr. Kelly said he would buck his union, which is backing Representative Richard A. Gephardt, by caucusing for Mr. Kerry. "He's got the right answers as far as I'm concerned."

Before Mr. Kerry was done, Pat Schilling, 48, declared herself a Republican no more. "I decided that to stand on the sidelines, do nothing, and allow Bush to have another four years was unacceptable," she said, after telling Mr. Kerry she would be caucusing for him, too. "I think he has integrity, and experience. And I think he cares about the average American."

Whether enough voters will agree is unclear, but Mr. Kerry has done much to persuade people to give him a closer look. In the last five weeks he has shaken up his staff, shortened and sharpened his stump speech, replaced his slogan — dropping the "courage to do what's right" for a "real deal" for America — and started trumpeting what he would do in his first 100 days if elected president.

But his advisers are also cautious about how quickly Mr. Kerry can gain ground on Howard Dean, saying they hope only to close the gap in New Hampshire to within striking distance by early January. A win there, Mr. Kerry's advisers now are conceding, will depend largely on whether he can gain the elusive "bounce" in news media attention and poll standings that could come from a strong showing in Iowa.

To that end, Mr. Kerry has sent to Des Moines Michael Whouley, a veteran Democratic field operative who first worked for Mr. Kerry on his 1982 race for lieutenant governor and who was Bill Clinton's national field director in 1992 and Al Gore's in 2000. Mr. Whouley, in turn, has had several staff members from states with later primaries transferred to Iowa to help, campaign officials said.

Mr. Whouley's knack for identifying supporters, turning them out to vote — and thinking on his feet — is the stuff of legend in New Hampshire: on primary day in 2000, after 4 p.m. surveys of voters leaving polls showed Mr. Gore down 4 points to Bill Bradley, Mr. Whouley sent workers onto the street to knock on doors and helped eke out a victory.

Mr. Whouley said he and other longtime Kerry advisers from Boston who had returned to the senator's side recently had done so because "every one of us feels he can still do it."

"Who's in the hunt in Iowa?" he said. "Dean, Gephardt, and Kerry. Who's in the hunt in New Hampshire? Dean and Kerry. In both places Kerry is very well thought of. He still has to close the deal, but there's plenty of time for him to do that."

To do it — and in no small measure, to break out of the fallen front-runner narrative that has dominated coverage of his campaign — Mr. Kerry has begun speaking past the news media. On Sunday, for example, he held a live televised forum with undecided Iowa Democrats. The half-hour program was broadcast on seven stations across the state at a cost of about $28,000, the campaign said, and could be replicated in New Hampshire. But its impact was doubtless limited by coverage of the capture of Saddam Hussein.

Still, the news of Mr. Hussein's capture seemed to buoy Mr. Kerry, as if it might at last prompt Democrats to reconsider Dr. Dean as their front-runner.

Appearing at a senior citizens center here on Monday to talk about Medicare, Mr. Kerry instead veered off into a 14-minute oration on how he had been right about Iraq all along, and how Americans "deserve more than hearing answers that are recited in a foreign policy speech written by someone else." At the same moment, Mr. Kerry knew full well, Dr. Dean was delivering a major foreign policy speech in Los Angeles.

Mr. Kerry has also been outlining his agenda for his first 100 days as president, to impress voters that he is best prepared to "hit the ground running" if elected.

"What can the next president do in the first 100 days?" his latest commercial in Iowa and New Hampshire begins. "John Kerry will put a stop to George Bush's radical agenda. He'll declare an end to Bush's go-it-alone foreign policy. Roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy to invest in health care and education. Expand antiracketeering laws to go after corporate corruption. And Kerry will make energy independence a national priority so no American will have to fight for Mideast oil."

The ads dovetail with the much-slimmed-down stump speech. In it, Mr. Kerry riffs on President Bush's notorious "mission accomplished" boast by saying the only missions accomplished under this administration have been those of corporate fat cats and Washington special interests — though he was forced to alter the text after Saddam Hussein's capture on Sunday.

Still, Mr. Kerry continues to lapse into the mode of a senator accustomed to delivering stemwinders until forced to yield the floor. Beginning a speech on civil liberties at Iowa State University recently, he spent nearly 10 minutes ignoring his text to list all the other issues that he was "tempted" to talk about but that were off the subject. And when he is tired, his stump can easily double in length to 20 minutes or more.

Mr. Kerry's aides acknowledge he will need to be at his sharpest all the time to persuade voters that he is adept and fiery enough as a candidate to beat Mr. Bush.

Buttonholing supermarket shoppers in Portsmouth, N.H., a week ago, Mr. Kerry finished his 15-second tête-à-tête with Paul Flanagan, 29, a counterman at a delicatessen in Dover, N.H., by saying he wanted to win the man's vote. Mr. Flanagan blurted, "I think you just did."

Mr. Flanagan said he was taken by Mr. Kerry's sincerity and seriousness. "People want that outspoken, harsh, this-is-my-way thing, and Dean's getting to that core voter," Mr. Flanagan mused. "We're looking for that guy who's able to say we're tired and not going to take it any more. But Dean's too stiff, too inflexible. He can't win.

"I don't think Kerry's doing as well," he added. "But he could win, if he's willing to get more of that fire going."



To: American Spirit who wrote (7657)12/16/2003 7:59:46 AM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Watch for Dean-Clinton in '04

So what was Al Gore really up to in his endorsement of Howard Dean?

By BETSY HART
December 15, 2003

Get ready for Hillary in the 2004 presidential sweepstakes.

No, I don't mean Senator Clinton will be running at the top of the ticket next year. I mean she'll be running for vice-president.

Before anyone counters that Hillary's enormous ego would never allow for a "number two," remember that she has two things even bigger than her ego — ambition and desire for power.

Here's how it's going to work: It now looks like former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean will scoop up the Democratic presidential nomination. The surprise endorsement by former Vice President Al Gore gave Dean the patina of establishment backing, while leaving Dean what he is — leftist, yes, but more than that the "angry" candidate. Dean is furious that George Bush won the 2000 election — he thinks it was stolen — and he's appealing to all the Bush-haters out there who feel the same way.

Including, apparently, Al Gore.

Ah, but when was the last time the "angry" candidate won the White House? It doesn't happen. Carter, Reagan, Clinton were all pretty jolly fellows, whatever their politics. Nixon might have been a bit grumpy at times, but he wasn't "angry." This is problem "one" for Dean. Here's problem "two." Hillary Clinton wants him to lose.

Because if Dean wins, she can't run in 2008 (since he would run for reelection). She'd be shut out of the presidential sweepstakes until 2012, and who knows what the political landscape will be then?

I'm not reading Hillary's mind. She's spelled it out. Virtually very elected Democrat in the country is publicly saying, whether he believes it or not, "I'm excited because we have a great chance of retaking the White House in 2004, every day things are moving more our way, blah blah blah." Here's what Senator Clinton told George Stephanopoulos last Sunday on ABC's "This Week," ". . .Look, I'm going to support the (Democrat presidential) nominee. And I think we've got at least a 50/50, if not slightly better, chance of winning."

Fifty/fifty? Whoopee. Talk about death by a thousand cuts.

Get ready for Hillary and Bill Clinton to suck the air out of the room and do everything in their power to keep Dean out of the White House in 2004. Unless. ...she's on the ticket.

Anyway, just this week Hillary said she wouldn't "speculate" on whether she would accept a vice-presidential nod. That seals it.

For all I know, Dean may not be able to stand Hillary, but who cares?

He wants to win. And long gone are the days when a ticket had to be "balanced" geographically. (Remember, both Bill Clinton and Al Gore were from the south.) What does matter is that while Hillary Clinton won't get rid of Dean's "anger" problem, she'll distract people from it. She'll bring in excitement, glamour and loads of bucks.

And talk about motivating your base.

There are fewer and fewer "undecided" voters in national elections anymore. More than ever the issue isn't winning over new voters, it's getting your voters to vote. Democrats know how much Republicans can't stand the thought of Hillary back in the White House — that's reason enough for the Democrats to get to the polls.

Such reasoning will be irresistible to Dean.

And what about Hillary? For starters, she doesn't have to give up her Senate seat to run. (She's not up for reelection in New York until 2006.) Of course if "Dean-Clinton" prevails, she's back in the White House. It may kill her to be in the "number two" slot there, though it would be the most powerful "number two" slot ever held, but it guarantees her the Democratic presidential nomination in 2012, and in the meantime she's only a heartbeat away from the presidency itself.

Yes, this does pose the "waiting 'til 2012" problem, but because it seals her chance to run then, in this case the wait is well worth it.

More likely though, the Dean-Clinton ticket would still lose.

(George Bush remains a major problem for both of them.) But don't worry about Hillary getting blamed for the loss. That would never happen. The same knives which so exquisitely cut to pieces the women her husband had affairs with, groped (or worse), would be employed to destroy the Dean campaign operatives so that Hillary is left smelling like a rose.

And then what? Hillary becomes the national party leader for four years, and she's handed the Democratic Presidential nomination in 2008.

"Dean-Clinton 2004." It's going to be an interesting race after all.

naplesnews.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (7657)12/16/2003 9:29:36 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 10965
 
DEAN MACHINE NEWS: N.J. GOV. McGreevey to back Dean in early gamble

nj.com

McGreevey to back Dean in early gamble

Governor seeks to influence presidential race 6 months before state primary, adviser says

Tuesday, December 16, 2003

BY JEFF WHELAN Star-Ledger Staff

Gov. James E. McGreevey plans to endorse Howard Dean for president this week, becoming the first governor in the nation to do so, according to four Democrats familiar with the decision.

By backing the former Vermont governor six months before New Jersey's last-in-the-nation primary, McGreevey hopes to act when it counts while the Democratic nomination is still up for grabs, a gamble Dean no doubt would remember should he emerge as the party's presidential candidate.

The alliance is unexpected. McGreevey has ties to a centrist Democratic group that has criticized Dean as being too liberal, and he has been a strong supporter of President Bush's decision to go to war with Iraq. Dean's fierce opposition to the war anchors his candidacy.

But one McGreevey adviser who requested anonymity said, "The endorsement is not built around foreign affairs. It's built around who we think can lead the party to victory, quite frankly."

The adviser also said of McGreevey, "He believes its very important to have an impact. This is a way for New Jersey to have some say in the process. It's a risk, but you can't make a difference unless you get in the game."

McGreevey hopes his endorsement will encourage other Democratic governors to follow suit, the adviser said. But McGreevey's biggest help could be as a fund-raiser. New Jersey historically has been one of the largest sources of campaign contributions in federal elections -- in 2000 and 2002, New Jersey ranked eighth -- and as governor, McGreevey has excelled at raising money.

One Democrat close to the Dean campaign, who also requested anonymity, said, "McGreevey brings a lot to the table. It will help us raise money and give us more credibility because a lot of people will take the governor's lead. It sends the signal -- we're not just some crazy candidate -- this is another chief executive backing Dean."

McGreevey and Dean will appear jointly later this week, and the governor will bring with him a "significant number" of Democratic elected officials and party leaders, two McGreevey advisers who requested anonymity said.

Many New Jersey Democrats -- including the state's two U.S. senators -- had put off making endorsements until now at the governor's request.

Micah Rasmussen, McGreevey's spokesman, declined to comment, as did Mike Beson, the New Jersey coordinator for the Dean campaign.

Only two other Democratic governors have made endorsements so far, and both backed favorite sons from their own states, according to the Democratic Governor's Association. Missouri Gov. Bob Holden has endorsed U.S. Rep. Richard Gephardt, and North Carolina Gov. Michael Easley has endorsed U.S. Sen. John Edwards.

In New Jersey, recent governors generally have waited until their party's nomination was all but locked up before making an endorsement.

Dean, the former Vermont governor, has been gaining momentum and won a major boost with former Vice President Al Gore's endorsement last week.

Dean has visited New Jersey several times and met with McGreevey at the governor's mansion in Princeton in September.

"The fact that Dean is the only governor in the race was appealing. He has run a state and dealt with budgets and education and transportation issues," said one McGreevey adviser.

The adviser said, "Dean has excited a large segment of the Democratic base in New Jersey unlike anyone else," noting that Dean's support extends to organized labor, African-Americans, Hispanics and women.

McGreevey had offered to meet with all of the Democratic presidential hopefuls. Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts and Gephardt took McGreevey up on the offer. Retired Gen. Wesley Clark had planned to meet with McGreevey but canceled.

McGreevey has called Lieberman an "old and dear friend." Lieberman served as chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council, a centrist Democratic think tank, in the 1990s when McGreevey led the organization's New Jersey chapter. The DLC has warned that Dean is too liberal to beat Bush.

McGreevey also was a strong supporter of Bush's decision to go to war with Iraq. When he delivered the response to the president's weekly radio address in May, McGreevey harshly criticized the president on domestic policy but said he "has shown tremendous leadership in the war on terrorism and the conflict in Iraq."

But despite differences on the war, Dean worked to court McGreevey with politics. He was the only presidential candidate to attend the state party's annual convention in Atlantic City this year. And at McGreevey's request, Dean also used his e-mail network in New Jersey to mobilize Democratic voters to go to the polls in this fall's low-turnout legislative elections which saw Democratic gains.



To: American Spirit who wrote (7657)12/17/2003 8:57:06 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 10965
 
The Bushed Economy

Message 19599099