Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George Coyne who wrote (511435)	12/17/2003 9:16:43 AM
From: Cola Can	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

you are stating the truth as you see it, based on many false premises You had the platform to state the truth "as you see it." But you didn't. Why not? I have stated reasons why I think Bush should resign or be impeached, based on Iraq's invasion. 1. No WMD - none 2. No Al Quaida - not there So what was the threat to America? 3. Billions of dollars spent 4. American lives Is this to be ignored? Something is wrong here. The American people should be demanding answers, but all I see is replies as yours that state I am only presenting opinions, while you don't defend Bush's invasion. Is Bush's only defense for invading Iraq is "Saddam gone?" The UN should have taken care of that. But here is something else you may disagree with. The UN is very anti-American. Would the UN have been so slow with Saddam if it were not so anti-American? Will it help the USA if it continues to attack countries based on reasons that don't exist? How is this making America safe? How is this creating jobs? Cuba has been a threat for almost 40 years. Why didn't Bush attack it? Cuba is at our back door. I heard Bush present the reasons for invading Iraq. I supported the war, but it is clear now, that those 'reasons' do not exist and Bush needs to be held accountable.