SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (7702)12/17/2003 6:17:11 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 10965
 
BY JAMES TARANTO
Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:34 p.m. EST

Albright Accuses Bush of Success
Some of the Democratic presidential candidates have been taunting President Bush over the failure thus far to capture Osama bin Laden--as if that task would be any easier if someone like Wesley Clark were in the White House. But this weekend's capture of Saddam Hussein has one Dem singing a new tune. Madeleine Albright, who served as Bill Clinton's secretary of state, is accusing the Bush administration of having captured bin Laden.

According to journalist Morton Kondracke, Albright was in the green room at Fox News Channel yesterday when "She said, 'Do you suppose that the Bush administration has Osama bin Laden hidden away somewhere and will bring him out before the election?' " Although Albright now says the remark was a "joke," Kondracke says that at the time, "she was not smiling," and other witnesses back him up: "Two makeup artists who prep the guests before their appearances also reported that Albright did not ask her question in a joking manner," Fox reports.

Whether serious or jocose, Albright's comments seem to be sheer speculation, and we know of no evidence to suggest that bin Laden is in custody. But the idea that he is actually is plausible. As Mark Bowden explained recently in The Atlantic Monthly, there are reasons other than domestic politics to keep such matters secret:

It is likely that some captured terrorists' names and arrests have not yet been revealed; people may be held for months before their "arrests" are staged. Once a top-level suspect is publicly known to be in custody, his intelligence value falls. His organization scatters, altering its plans, disguises, cover stories, codes, tactics, and communication methods. The maximum opportunity for intelligence gathering comes in the first hours after an arrest, before others in a group can possibly know that their walls have been breached. Keeping an arrest quiet for days or weeks prolongs this opportunity.

Albright served in an administration that was similarly accused of politically opportunistic timing; Bill Clinton's decisions to bomb Afghanistan, Sudan and Iraq in 1998 coincided with key moments in his impeachment ordeal. Whatever his motives, Clinton would have been entitled to a full measure of political credit had he succeeded in killing bin Laden or ousting Saddam. If bin Laden is indeed in U.S. custody, no one but the angriest of the Angry Left will begrudge President Bush kudos for a job well done.

Free Iraq Confronts U.N.
Hoshyar Zebari, foreign minister of liberated Iraq, gave the U.N. Security Council a much-needed dose of reality yesterday. "The U.N. as an organization failed to help rescue the Iraqi people from a murderous tyranny of 35 years," he said. "The U.N. must not fail the Iraqi people again." Agence France-Presse reports he also "called for a swift UN return to the country," which prompted Secretary-General Kofi Annan to sniff that it is "no time to pin blame and point fingers." Annan added that "I think the U.N. has done as much as it can for Iraq."

It's fair to note that before 2002 the U.S. failed Iraq as much as the U.N. did. Although liberating Iraq has in theory been U.S. policy since 1998, in practice Washington mostly went along with the status quo of international sanctions, bombing and containment--until President Bush shifted course last year. He invited the U.N. to join the U.S., France balked, and as a result the U.N.'s policy toward Iraq is today in shambles. After being hit by a terrorist attack, the U.N. cut and ran, whereas the U.S., which has suffered far more casualties, is in for the long haul.

Remember this the next time someone urges that America should make way for the U.N., as the New York Times does today in an editorial arguing that Saddam Hussein be tried in a tribunal "under United Nations authority." The U.N. has no moral authority, especially where Iraq is concerned.

"The U.N. has done as much as it can for Iraq," says Kofi Annan. Fine--let's leave it at that.

The World's Smallest Violin
One man is a tragedy, the saying goes, while a million deaths are a statistic. OK, it's easier to summon compassion for a single person than for a massive number of victims, but this is ridiculous: "I felt pity to see this man destroyed," Cardinal Renato Martino said yesterday. Martino, who heads the Vatican's Justice and Peace department, was troubled by the pictures of a medic looking inside Saddam Hussein's mouth "as if he were a cow. They could have spared us these pictures."

"Seeing him like this, a man in his tragedy, despite all the heavy blame he bears, I had a sense of compassion for him," Martino added. The heart bleeds.

'One of Their Own'
On The American Spectator Online, humorist Steve Hornbeck offers an amusing take on Democratic reaction to Saddam's capture: "For their part, Dean supporters posting messages on the campaign website were in a deep funk. Saddam's unkempt appearance and the fact he was described as "very disoriented" gave most the feeling he was, in many ways, one of their own."

Yeah, it's a cheap shot, but admit it--you laughed.

What Would Saddam's Ego Do Without Experts?
"Experts: Saddam Holds On to Ego"--headline, USA Today, Dec. 17

This Just In--I
"Blix Sceptical on Iraqi WMD Claim"--headline, BBC Web site, Dec. 16

Bad Timing Alert
Here's another one worthy of von Hoffman, a column by John Aloysius Farrell of the Denver Post:

Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein may have gotten off to a good December.

Thanks to us.

We won't bore you with all the details, but basically Farrell's argument is that President Bush's decision to withhold primary contracts for Iraqi construction from countries that refused to join the coalition will alienate "allies" and thus make victory harder to achieve. This article ran in Sunday's paper, which means by the time most Denverians were reading it over their coffee, the TV was bringing news that Saddam's December had taken a turn for the worse. It would be two more days, however, before it was clear Farrell was also wrong about the creditors' willingness to restructure Iraq's debt.

You Don't Say
"US Remains Iraq Resistance Target"--headline, BBC Web site, Dec. 16

What Would We Do Without Afghan Officials?
"Osama bin Laden Remains Out of Grasp, Afghan Officials Say"--headline, Salt Lake Tribune, Dec. 16

What Would We Do Without Clark?
"Clark Describes Milosevic as Stubborn"--headline, Associated Press, Dec. 16

What Would Musharraf Do Without Experts?
"Musharraf Assassination Bid Carried Out by Experts"--headline, Radio Singapore Web site, Dec. 16

Economy Killers
Today the New York Times came close to publishing yet another false obituary. An article by Felicity Barringer, on a court ruling involving Yellowstone National Park, makes passing reference to America's "moribund national economy." Moribund means "near death," and this seems an odd way to refer to an economy that grew last quarter at an annual rate of more than 8%.

Barringer's slip-up is probably an example of bad writing rather than blatant bias. On the other hand, this Times headline from yesterday clearly falls into the latter category: "New Democratic Group Finances a Republican-like Attack on Dean."

2008 Elections Canceled?
Hillary Clinton denounced the Bush administration in a Miami speech last night, the Associated Press reports. "I cannot even imagine four years of a second term of this administration, with no accountability and no election at the end," New York's junior said.

Wait--what's this about "no election"? Does Hillary think the 2008 election is going to be canceled? Or does she just want the other Dems to believe that so she'll have the field all to herself?

Less Better Blues
"We are about to see the first generation of American leadership to leave our nation less better off than it was before."--Sen. Hillary Clinton, quoted in the New York Sun, Dec. 17

Boy, He Really Does Like to Pray
"Bush to Undergo MRI on Knees"--headline, CNN.com, Dec. 17

Zero-Tolerance Watch
Clay-Chalkville High School in Pinson, Ala., has suspended 15-year-old Ysatis Jones, a sophomore, for a "major drug offense," the Birmingham News reports. The offense? She took ibuprofin for menstrual cramps. "It is harsh. I will admit that," Nez Calhoun, a Jefferson County School District spokeswoman, tells the paper. "If we don't have consequences for aberrations of the rule, then we never will get a handle on drugs in the school."

News You Can Use
"The Train Can Ease Your Airport Holiday Woes"--headline, CNN.com, Dec. 17

Stop the Presses
"Some Teams Win, Some Lose"--headline, USA Today, Dec. 15

What Would Deadly Caregivers Do Without Experts?
"Deadly Caregivers Enjoy the Power, Experts Say"--headline, Morning Call (Allentown, Pa.), Dec. 17

This Just In--II
"Keeping Fit Has Long-Term Benefits"--headline, BBC Web site, Dec. 17

So Bus Them to Lake Wobegon
"Many Urban Students Score Below Average"--headline, Associated Press, Dec. 17

Not Too Brite--CXXVIII
"A British woman described by police as "every man's nightmare" was jailed for life Monday for murdering her second husband on his birthday--probably by poisoning his curry," Reuters reports from London.

Oddly Enough!

The Birds, the Bees and the Elephants
"Group Said to Try to Inseminate Elephants" reads the headline on an Associated Press dispatch from Bangkok. If we remember our high-school biology, one bull elephant could do the job of the whole group.

Maybe the Thais should take lessons from Joycelyn Elders, the former surgeon general, who has made a life's work of clearing up misconceptions about sexuality and health. "Many HMOs feel that women are just like men," the Argus of Fremont, Calif., quotes her as saying. "We know that's not true."

The lesson would seem to be: Never go on a blind date with an HMO administrator.

Fear of Flying
We've often observed that today's political left has largely abandoned its faith in social progress and become almost entirely a reactionary movement. George Monbiot, a columnist for the London Guardian, provides a nice example in a piece on the 100th anniversary of the Wright Brothers' first flight, which is today.

The anniversary "should be a day of international mourning," moans Monbiot. "December 17 2003 is the centenary of the world's most effective killing machine." Monbiot calls flying machines a weapon of mass destruction; after all, have been used to drop bombs, including nuclear ones (though as the late Bob Bartley pointed out, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved a lot of Japanese lives). More recently, al Qaeda used planes in their attacks on Sept. 11. Monbiot's conclusion:

Just as Alexander the Great worshipped his horse, George Bush, the new conqueror of Persia [sic], will [today] worship the aeroplane. Our societies are built upon these technologies of war: the current world order fell from the hatches of the aeroplane. At 10.35am, North Carolina time, George Bush and the other enthusiasts for domination will bow down before it. The rest of us should observe 12 seconds of silence, in commemoration of the deeds wrought by those magnificent men in their killing machines.

But wait. Monbiot glosses too quickly over Alexander and his horse, though he does note earlier in the piece that "in the past we raised our eyes to the men on horseback. Today we raise our eyes to the heavens." Plainly the trouble began with the invention of horses. Horses go "neigh," it's time to say "nay" right back to them.

(Elizabeth Crowley helps compile Best of the Web Today. Thanks to Carol Ising, Michael Hertzberg, Tipton Cole, Fred Abbe, Jared Silverman, David Bookless, Steve Ginnings, Matthew Curran, Andy Hefty, Raghu Desikan, Barak Moore, Andreas Udby, Maria Fish, Alan Smith, David Stern, Tim Graham, Michael Segal, Edward Himmelfarb, Alan Ridgeway, Justin Taylor, Michael Nunnelley, John Archer, Jerome Marcus, Janice Lyons, Pamela Smith, Ed Lasky, Erik Moy, Joe Deltoro, Mike Glasgow, Peter Cummings, Morton Landowne, Dan Friedman, Maura Seger, Aaron Spetner, Jeff Marti, C.E. Dobkin, Gary Petersen, William Pries, John Williamson, Brent Silver, Brian Pleshek, Mark Schulze, Cecil Ross, Nick Eckert, Ruhama Shattan, Jim Peterson, Ken Ralff, Pat Haveron, Heidi Huettner, C.K. Lee, Dennis Sevakis, Jim Kirkwood, Paul Keleher, Lee Harris, Yehuda Hilewitz, Shane Nichols, Peter Eipers, Elliot Ganz, Daniel Goldstein, Brendan Schulman, Dave Johns, Brian Ballard, Kevin Dietrich, Robert LeChevalier, Steve Jackson, Ron Butler, Aviva Ross, Mike Marinacci, Doug Levene and Jeremy Winer. If you have a tip, write us at opinionjournal@wsj.com, and please include the URL.)



To: calgal who wrote (7702)12/17/2003 6:23:04 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Linda Chavez





Is Dr. Dean well?

newsandopinion.com | Howard Dean is increasingly looking like he's come unhinged. While the Democratic front-runner shows no sign of slowing his long march toward his party's nomination, he has begun saying things that are not only irresponsible, they sound downright wacky.

First there was Dean's accusation that the president might have been warned about the September 11, 2001, attacks. On the Diane Rehm show on National Public Radio, Dean said, "The most interesting theory that I have heard so far, which is nothing more than a theory, I can't think — it can't be proved, is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis. Now who knows what the real situation is."

Dean tried to back away from the nutty accusation a week later when interviewed by Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday." "Why would you say that," Wallace asked him, "Do you believe that?" To which Dean replied, "No, I don't believe that. I can't imagine the president of the United States doing that. But we don't know, and it'd be a nice thing to know."

A nice thing to know? I suppose it would be nice to know that the president is not really an alien from outer space sent to rule the world. But most of us who are sane creatures assume that is the case — certainly no one has to prove it to us.

But Dean can't help himself from saying weird things. On Monday, in what was billed as his first major foreign policy address, Dean said that "The capture of Saddam has not made America safer."

No doubt Dean would be happier if Saddam were still on the loose, since he, and indeed many in the Democratic Party, had pointed to the inability to capture either Saddam or Osama bin Laden as one of President Bush's major failures in the war on terrorism. But to say that Americans are no safer with Saddam behind bars is just plain strange.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman accused Dean of "climbing into his own spider hole of denial." Lieberman sounded offended, as an American: "Saddam Hussein is a homicidal maniac, brutal dictator, supporter of terrorism and enemy of the United States, and there should be no doubt that America and the world are safer with him captured."

Howard Dean is an angry man, and he lashes out with such venom and hatred that he sometimes can't control his words — or those of his most ardent followers. At a recent fundraiser, Dean stood off stage while comedian Judy Gold said of the president of the United States, "We have to get this piece of living, breathing s — - out of the office." Kate Lloyd, another comedian at the event, drew laughs when she referred to Michael Jackson's pending charges of child molestation. "Frankly, I'm far more frightened of Condoleezza Rice," she said, and then went on to refer to Vice President Dick Cheney's wife as Lon Chaney, an actor in horror movies. And trash-mouth comedian Janeane Garofalo, referred to the new Medicare prescription drug bill as the " 'you can go f — - yourself, Grandma' bill."



Dean chose to go onstage anyway, forfeiting an opportunity to pull a Bill Clinton "Sister Souljah" move. In 1992, candidate Bill Clinton chastised Jesse Jackson for inviting Sister Souljah to a Rainbow Coalition event because the rapper had suggested, in the wake of the 1992 Los Angeles riots, "If black people kill black people every day, why not have a week and kill white people."

The most Howard Dean would say when he came onstage after the comedians had spewed their filth was a vague reference to some of the language that was used — which was directed more at the "N" word liberally sprinkled throughout some of the routines. "I just don't have much tolerance for ethnic humor," Dean said. "We are all one community."

When a Washington Post reporter asked Dean about the role anger plays in his campaign, "Dean responds negatively — in fact, angrily, to the suggestion that his campaign is driven by anger." But that anger is making the candidate behave as if he were slightly unbalanced. George W. Bush may drive some Democrats crazy, but they better hope their likely nominee gets a grip on himself soon, or he'll make the whole party look mad next November.

URL:http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/chavez.html