SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (512076)12/17/2003 10:25:55 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 769670
 
U.S. Diplomats, Families Urged to Leave Saudi Arabia

Wednesday, December 17, 2003

WASHINGTON — Nonessential American diplomats and the families of all U.S. officials in Saudi Arabia (search) should leave, the State Department (search) said Wednesday, stepping up its warnings about risks in the country.



Private U.S. citizens also should consider departing, the department said. Americans making plans to go to Saudi Arabia were advised to defer any such travel in light of "the potential for further terrorist activities."

The departure of U.S. officials and family members was voluntary, with the U.S. government covering the expenses.

"We remain fully confident that Saudi authorities are doing everything they can to protect their citizens and foreign nationals in the kingdom against terrorist attacks," department spokesman Lou Fintor said. He said the department's decision was "based on the reality that the terrorist threat in Saudi Arabia remains at a critical level."

Security was tight in the Saudi capital, Riyadh (search), with a heavy police presence in the city and armored personnel carries and heavily armed soldiers outside Western housing compounds and at key intersections. Police and soldiers manned roadblocks and checkpoints, and there was beefed-up security outside the diplomatic quarter, where a number of Western embassies are located.

Americans who travel to the kingdom or remain there despite the warning were told to register with the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh or the consulates in Jiddah and Dhahran.

"The U.S. government continues to receive indications of terrorist threats aimed at American and Western interests," the department said. Americans in Saudi Arabia were advised to remain vigilant, "particularly in public places associated with the Western community."

No single specific threat or piece of intelligence led to the department's action, said a U.S. counterterrorism official, speaking on condition of anonymity. Instead, the decision was based on a review of the entire terrorism picture in the kingdom.

There are some 200 to 300 nonessential U.S. officials and family members in Saudi Arabia, and about 30,000 U.S. citizens in all.

Travel by American officials and their families in Riyadh already is restricted to 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.

Last month, a housing compound in Riyadh was bombed, killing 17 people and wounding more than 100. Police arrested a Saudi citizen believed to have helped smuggle in from Yemen the weapons used in the attack, the Saudi daily Okaz reported Wednesday.

American and Saudi officials blamed that attack and homicide bombings at three other housing projects in May on Saudi exile Usama bin Laden's Al Qaeda (search) terrorist network. Thirty-five people, including nine attackers were killed.

The State Department responded by ordering nonessential U.S. officials and family members to depart.

The diplomatic quarter east of Riyadh has been guarded heavily by Saudi armed forces since the homicide attacks.

Saudi officials say most of the weapons used in militant operations in Saudi Arabia -- including the May homicide attacks -- were smuggled from Yemen.



To: calgal who wrote (512076)12/17/2003 10:26:03 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 769670
 
Hussein Arrest Yields Details on Resistance
Detention of Insurgents Rise, U.S. Commander Says
By Bradley Graham
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 18, 2003; Page A37

KIRKUK, Iraq, Dec. 17 -- The top commander of U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf region said Wednesday that the capture of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein had given U.S. authorities valuable insight into the structure and operations of the resistance.



"I don't want to characterize it as a great intelligence windfall," said Army Gen. John Abizaid, the head of U.S. Central Command. "But it's clear that we have gained a greater understanding of how things work as a result of capturing him and looking over his environment and understanding the whole picture."

Information gained from the capture, coupled with intelligence gathered during an intensified effort over the past two months, has contributed to "a good haul" of more suspected insurgents, Abizaid said. He described those detained as "several mid-level Baathist leaders of cells in areas that we haven't had the opportunity to really get a good grip on previously."

As a sign of stepped-up military activity resulting from the new intelligence, troops from the 4th Infantry Division conducted a second day of raids in the town of Samarra, 70 miles north of Baghdad, which has been an area of fierce resistance. Maj. Gen. Ray Odierno identified nine Iraqis taken into custody Wednesday as "mid-level" operatives -- "financiers, organizers, arms suppliers."

In the northern city of Mosul, Maj. Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of the 101st Airborne Division, reported Wednesday that documents found with Hussein confirmed that the former president had had contact with several suspected Iraqi insurgents long sought by U.S. forces in northwestern Iraq.

Abizaid, Odierno and Petraeus spoke to reporters traveling with Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who is touring the region. The generals emphasized that much work still needs to be done to defeat the Iraqi resistance but also gave the strong impression that they believed a corner had been turned after months of trying to penetrate the networks of insurgents.

For much of the summer and early fall, as guerrilla attacks mounted, U.S. commanders frequently acknowledged a lack of understanding about the enemy they faced. They complained about a shortage of intelligence analysts and linguists to sort through the information they said had begun to pour in from informants.

Things began to change about two months ago. That's when, according to Abizaid, the "intelligence system" launched "a full-court press" focused on tying together leads and forming a sharper picture of the resistance structure.

More analysts and linguists were provided, some of them diverted from the hunt for Hussein's suspected stocks of unconventional weapons. More emphasis was placed on finding Hussein's family and tribal members and on identifying mid-level operatives in the resistance.

"The capture of Saddam is indicative of knowing more about the enemy," Abizaid said.

Abizaid likened the piecing together of information about the resistance to a war against organized crime, in which the key is developing the big picture.

"You have to look at the entire network, you have to understand the complete organization, and how it works, how it mutates, and over time you begin to get at it," Abizaid said. "That's exactly what you're starting to see now."

Although U.S. authorities have attributed some of the violence in Iraq to non-Iraqi Islamic militants, Abizaid said most of the resistance is homegrown. It consists, he said, of elements from Hussein's former government who use "the covert structure that existed within the Baath Party, within the Iraqi intelligence service, within the Special Security Organization."

Defeating them, the general said, requires the same basic strategy used to counter any insurgency -- isolating them from money, ammunition, leadership and public support. Abizaid said a recent series of attempted bank robberies in Iraq may indicate that the insurgents are running low on cash.

"I don't want to jump to conclusions, but I believe that money is starting to dry up in the resistance because we are starting to understand not only where money is coming from internally but externally," Abizaid said.

Asked about the size of the insurgency, Abizaid stuck by the estimate he gave last month of about 5,000 resistance fighters. He said the capture of Hussein had dealt the insurgency "a huge psychological blow" that would "pay great benefits over time." But he predicted "still a lot of violence ahead in Iraq."

Abizaid noted that the level of violence has tended to ebb and flow. "There's a notion, I think, that a lot of people have that this is linear," he said. "But it's really not linear. It's more like a sine wave."

Odierno predicted that attacks would become "more horrific," involving more suicide bombers and vehicles laden with explosives, "because everything else hasn't worked" and the insurgents "don't have much else left."


© 2003 The Washington Post Company



To: calgal who wrote (512076)12/17/2003 11:17:04 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Edwards, Gephardt Take Turns Criticizing Dean
By Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, December 13, 2003; Page A10

Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.), trying to distinguish himself as a more optimistic and centrist alternative to Democratic front-runner Howard Dean, yesterday broadly criticized the former Vermont governor's strategy for winning the White House.

Edwards, who lags far behind Dean in Iowa and New Hampshire, hit Dean for wanting to "duck the values debate," which has particular resonance in the South, and for pursuing an "angry" and "divisive" campaign of limited appeal nationwide. Although Edwards never mentioned Dean by name, he was the target, an Edwards adviser said.

"If all we are is divisive and angry and if all we do is attack President Bush and each other, then we will not win the White House in 2004," Edwards said, according to a text of the speech he delivered in San Francisco. "And we won't deserve to."

While Edwards was whacking Dean from the right, Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) hit him from the left. He accused Dean of "gross hypocrisy" for offering corporations -- including Enron -- generous tax benefits to set up shop in Vermont while he was governor. Dean routinely criticizes Bush for offering tax breaks that benefited the Houston-based energy giant, which set up a subsidiary in Vermont before scandal rocked and eventually ruined the company.

According to a report in yesterday's Boston Globe, Dean gave tax breaks to companies to set up insurance businesses in his state. The insurance firms, known as "captives," are established to insure their parent companies. In addition to offering tax incentives, Dean helped defeat an effort by President Bill Clinton to eliminate federal tax breaks for these insurance companies, the article said.

Dean "has been hiding the fact he turned Vermont into a tax shelter," said Gephardt. Dean governed, Gephardt said, "under the Bush model" by pushing such tax breaks while his state was cutting programs for children and the elderly.

Dean spokesman Jay Carson said Dean is "not going to make any apologies for working to strengthen the economy of Vermont." It is not uncommon for governors to offer companies tax incentives to bring business to their state, a practice Gephardt criticized as un-Democratic.

Yesterday's attack continued Gephardt's campaign to paint Dean as a weak defender of "Democratic values," whether it is Medicare, because Dean advocated slowing the growth of the program in the 1990s, or tax breaks for captives.

The twin attacks from Edwards and Gephardt could have the unintended consequence of making Dean look like a centrist. The more Dean gets criticized from the left and the right, the easier it gets for Dean to shed his image as an antiwar, anti-tax-cut Northeast liberal, his supporters say. Still, there is little evidence the intensifying attacks are altering the race or eroding Dean's support.

In his speech, Edwards slammed Dean's strategy for victory in the South. To win in Dixie, where Al Gore went winless in 2000, Dean has advocated forcing the debate beyond "guns, God and gays."

"Some in my party want to duck the values debate," said Edwards. "They want to say to America: 'We're not interested in your values; we want to change the subject to anything else.' That's wrong. You can't tell voters what to believe or what to vote on. Where I come from, voters are looking for answers, not attitude."

Edwards, who is banking on winning South Carolina and several other southern states to capture the nomination, has tried to run a positive and issue-oriented campaign, but he has detoured a few times to take issue with Dean on race and regional matters.

Carson, Dean's spokesman, said: "This is more desperate attacks from the Washington politicians."

© 2003 The Washington Post Company